Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

That Guy 888

(1,214 posts)
9. I seem to remember someone posted a story about "parallel prosecutions" um... last year?
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 04:52 AM
Jun 2016

The story said that law enforcement already does this illegally. Something along the lines of: while wire tapping a second or third tier* terrorist contact, they hear about other unrelated criminal activity like drug smuggling, the agency involved then tips off state or local law enforcement about the details of the drug smuggling. The local law enforcement then plays it off as an anonymous tip or acting on a hunch. Legally I think it violates the Forth Amendment, since the drug smuggling wouldn't be covered by the terrorism warrant, unless the proceeds where funding terrorism, but I'm not a lawyer.



*Under bush's surveillance, I think they were called "tiers" or "points of contact" something like that. If you or I called a pizza place that had also been called by a suspected terrorist, we would have been placed under electronic scrutiny as well. Obama knocked it back to two: only people the hypothetical terrorist had direct contact with.


Hopefully this post makes sense, too tired to search for the "good read" story that was posted.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm so looking forward to this for the next 4-8 years... more of the same... phazed0 Jun 2016 #1
Aside from surveillance state, can't this be overcome by a VPN or proxy? askeptic Jun 2016 #18
Not easily.. or at all... phazed0 Jun 2016 #20
So then they just use public hotspots askeptic Jun 2016 #24
Lol, yeah, in reality it is farcical... phazed0 Jun 2016 #25
So Does Every Law Enforcement Agency billhicks76 Jun 2016 #2
Soon every case will be deemed "terrorism" / "spy case", or way too many. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #3
I seem to remember someone posted a story about "parallel prosecutions" um... last year? That Guy 888 Jun 2016 #9
I doubt it as it would be about impossible for the government to defend the law in court cstanleytech Jun 2016 #16
I though Obama was a "Constitutional Scholar" dickthegrouch Jun 2016 #4
Why not just wipe your ass on the entire constitution at one whole time rather than on amendment Feeling the Bern Jun 2016 #5
MORE haystacks? have they found any pins? pansypoo53219 Jun 2016 #6
Kick and Rec for awareness. PoliticalMalcontent Jun 2016 #7
And the Presumptive Democratic Nominee proposes no changes. OnyxCollie Jun 2016 #8
Terrorism? You mean like chanting, making leaflets and writing with chalk on the sidewalk ? Scuba Jun 2016 #10
Watch out for Double-Secret Hopscotch activation instructions in chalk. JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2016 #11
hows about they gets themselves a damn warrant instead? Warren Stupidity Jun 2016 #12
Because warrants are too hard to come by? IronLionZion Jun 2016 #13
part of the creeping facism Locrian Jun 2016 #14
"Terrorist" = Any person the government doesn't like. Odin2005 Jun 2016 #15
If there's evidence to support it being necessary then they can get a warrant. herding cats Jun 2016 #17
I'm sure this would never be abused. nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #19
Do people save their internet browser histories? valerief Jun 2016 #21
Guilty until electronically exonerated.... sofa king Jun 2016 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author proverbialwisdom Jun 2016 #23
Sorrry folks, but I cant get too upset over this. napi21 Jun 2016 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FBI Wants Access To Inter...»Reply #9