Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Assange Has Requested Political Asylum & Is Under Protection of Ecuardorian Embassy in London [View all]Hissyspit
(45,790 posts)60. "For several reasons, Assange has long feared that the US would be able to coerce Sweden into..."
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/12015-focus-julian-assanges-right-to-asylum
"For several reasons, Assange has long feared that the US would be able to coerce Sweden into handing him over far more easily than if he were in Britain. For one, smaller countries such as Sweden are generally more susceptible to American pressure and bullying.
For another, that country has a disturbing history of lawlessly handing over suspects to the US. A 2006 UN ruling found Sweden in violation of the global ban on torture for helping the CIA render two suspected terrorists to Egypt, where they were brutally tortured (both individuals, asylum-seekers in Sweden, were ultimately found to be innocent of any connection to terrorism and received a monetary settlement from the Swedish government).
Perhaps most disturbingly of all, Swedish law permits extreme levels of secrecy in judicial proceedings and oppressive pre-trial conditions, enabling any Swedish-US transactions concerning Assange to be conducted beyond public scrutiny. Ironically, even the US State Department condemned Sweden's "restrictive conditions for prisoners held in pretrial custody", including severe restrictions on their communications with the outside world.
Assange's fear of ending up in the clutches of the US is plainly rational and well-grounded. One need only look at the treatment over the last decade of foreign nationals accused of harming American national security to know that's true; such individuals are still routinely imprisoned for lengthy periods without any charges or due process. Or consider the treatment of Bradley Manning, accused of leaking to WikiLeaks: a formal UN investigation found that his pre-trial conditions of severe solitary confinement were "cruel, inhuman and degrading", and he now faces capital charges of aiding al-Qaida. The Obama administration's unprecedented obsession with persecuting whistleblowers and preventing transparency what even generally supportive, liberal magazines call "Obama's war on whistleblowers" makes those concerns all the more valid."
"For several reasons, Assange has long feared that the US would be able to coerce Sweden into handing him over far more easily than if he were in Britain. For one, smaller countries such as Sweden are generally more susceptible to American pressure and bullying.
For another, that country has a disturbing history of lawlessly handing over suspects to the US. A 2006 UN ruling found Sweden in violation of the global ban on torture for helping the CIA render two suspected terrorists to Egypt, where they were brutally tortured (both individuals, asylum-seekers in Sweden, were ultimately found to be innocent of any connection to terrorism and received a monetary settlement from the Swedish government).
Perhaps most disturbingly of all, Swedish law permits extreme levels of secrecy in judicial proceedings and oppressive pre-trial conditions, enabling any Swedish-US transactions concerning Assange to be conducted beyond public scrutiny. Ironically, even the US State Department condemned Sweden's "restrictive conditions for prisoners held in pretrial custody", including severe restrictions on their communications with the outside world.
Assange's fear of ending up in the clutches of the US is plainly rational and well-grounded. One need only look at the treatment over the last decade of foreign nationals accused of harming American national security to know that's true; such individuals are still routinely imprisoned for lengthy periods without any charges or due process. Or consider the treatment of Bradley Manning, accused of leaking to WikiLeaks: a formal UN investigation found that his pre-trial conditions of severe solitary confinement were "cruel, inhuman and degrading", and he now faces capital charges of aiding al-Qaida. The Obama administration's unprecedented obsession with persecuting whistleblowers and preventing transparency what even generally supportive, liberal magazines call "Obama's war on whistleblowers" makes those concerns all the more valid."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Assange Has Requested Political Asylum & Is Under Protection of Ecuardorian Embassy in London [View all]
Hissyspit
Jun 2012
OP
UK wont give him to the US, he has no charges against him, certainly not in the US
larkrake
Jun 2012
#12
"For several reasons, Assange has long feared that the US would be able to coerce Sweden into..."
Hissyspit
Jun 2012
#60
I agree, if anything the Sweden thing is just delaying extradition to the US if that is
Bacchus4.0
Jun 2012
#65
i support assange and hope he can eventually get back to providing an outlet for whistleblowers. nt
xiamiam
Jun 2012
#52
whole so-called 'case' against Assange is very troublesome, rife w/ CIA ties, & a dodgy prosecutor
stockholmer
Jun 2012
#21
He waited for 5 wks in Sweden and authorities never got it together to meet w/ him for questioning.
snot
Jun 2012
#80
"(Sweden has) a disturbing history of lawlessly handing over suspects to the US."
Hissyspit
Jun 2012
#61
I thought he ran for office in Australia. Wouldn't that preclude his being arrested?
freshwest
Jun 2012
#44
I thought he ran for office in Australia. Wouldn't that preclude his being arrested?
clang1
Jun 2012
#45
It is so different from our legal system where bail means charges; talking can be done on the phone.
freshwest
Jun 2012
#55
He announced earlier that he would be a Senate candidate in the next federal election,
Matilda
Jun 2012
#73
Thanks Matilda. I'd only read a blurb about him running, didn't know it wasn't until next year.
freshwest
Jun 2012
#74
dipsydoodle, you understand the system in the UK best. Bail - for what? Dropped charges?
freshwest
Jun 2012
#56
Thanks, dipsydoodle. The system is so different from ours. So many countries..
freshwest
Jun 2012
#58
More precisely, Assange's lawyers chose to describe a letter from Attorney-General Nicola Roxon
struggle4progress
Jun 2012
#67
Australia regularly involves itself when any Australian citizen is in trouble overseas...
Violet_Crumble
Jun 2012
#77