Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sorry to hear that. GoneOffShore Jun 2016 #1
Concentrate on this OnDoutside Jun 2016 #63
And be her VP too IronLionZion Jun 2016 #2
Going to be interesting. In my view that would be a winning ticket still_one Jun 2016 #32
That would allow the Republican governor of Massachusetts to appoint a Republican to her seat. totodeinhere Jun 2016 #42
Harry Reid says he believes there's a mechanism to allow Warren to be VP... thesquanderer Jun 2016 #53
Well, there must be an election by law, but they Hortensis Jun 2016 #64
A Dem would be favored but remember the last time they had a special election to fill a totodeinhere Jun 2016 #66
24 of 34 US Senate seats up for grabs are Republican IronLionZion Jun 2016 #54
Right. Hortensis Jun 2016 #67
Joe Kennedy III can run in the special election. Easy win. ashtonelijah Jun 2016 #58
For the Kennedy clan, he is Generation Next - Joe Kennedy III Scientific Jun 2016 #60
I would love that ticket leftynyc Jun 2016 #62
All aboard the H-train !!!! Final destination: 1600 Pennsylvanis Avenue. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #3
Watch out for that bus Senator! doc03 Jun 2016 #4
The Hypocrite Badge has now been bestowed upon you Senator. retrowire Jun 2016 #5
Heaven forbid that a Democrat endorse the Democratic nominee for president. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #7
Kim Davis was a Democrat too. retrowire Jun 2016 #8
And Elizabeth Warren was a Republican TwilightZone Jun 2016 #10
And so was Hillary. nt retrowire Jun 2016 #13
40 years ago. stopbush Jun 2016 #16
When she was in high school. Elizabeth was till she was 40. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #17
And now you're comparing Elizabeth to Kim Davis. pnwmom Jun 2016 #15
Point out where I did that. retrowire Jun 2016 #18
Your post #8, in response to post #7, about Elizabeth's endorsement of Hillary .n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #23
That's not a comparison. Thanks for playing. :) nt retrowire Jun 2016 #25
Elizabeth Warren was the Dem in #7. pnwmom Jun 2016 #26
a comparison would be contrasting the two against one another retrowire Jun 2016 #39
No, comparing isn't the same as contrasting. And since you used the word "too" pnwmom Jun 2016 #40
semantics aside, you know my point. retrowire Jun 2016 #41
That's why we have a Big Tent! yallerdawg Jun 2016 #48
I've heard that. retrowire Jun 2016 #49
I knew many who claimed to love Elizabeth would inevitably feel betrayed. pnwmom Jun 2016 #9
Well it makes sense. retrowire Jun 2016 #11
Instead of spouting off, maybe you should LISTEN to what the woman you claim pnwmom Jun 2016 #19
I don't have TV. retrowire Jun 2016 #21
Just wait until Sanders endorses Hillary TwilightZone Jun 2016 #12
This, I will understand. retrowire Jun 2016 #14
Already making up excuses for having double-standards, eh? TwilightZone Jun 2016 #20
No, its just that Bernie said in his AB that the lesser of two evils is necessary sometimes. nt retrowire Jun 2016 #35
How can you say she's not making sense when you don't know what she is saying? pnwmom Jun 2016 #22
Hasn't Bernie been railing against moneyed politics for his entire career? oberliner Jun 2016 #33
his words about voting the lesser of two evils in his autobiography. nt retrowire Jun 2016 #36
There are no such words oberliner Jun 2016 #43
yep. when he voted for Bill, he considered it one of those moments retrowire Jun 2016 #45
What page? oberliner Jun 2016 #65
Warren endorsing Hillary absolutely makes sense. NYC Liberal Jun 2016 #55
Warren said in April 2014 that Hillary is "terrific" Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #29
i guess i didnt know Warren then retrowire Jun 2016 #37
Those two bankruptcy bills she talks about were NOT the same. NYC Liberal Jun 2016 #56
nope. unlike some she realizes what's at stake still_one Jun 2016 #30
I do too. nt retrowire Jun 2016 #38
I don't think it's hypocritical to endorse Clinton when the alternative is Trump. totodeinhere Jun 2016 #44
well its hypocritical to endorse a candidate that you normally oppose position wise. retrowire Jun 2016 #46
Just wait til Bernie endorses Hillary. Then you're really gonna lose it. ashtonelijah Jun 2016 #59
nope. already said im cool with that. lol nt retrowire Jun 2016 #61
Elizabeth is giving a full-throated, passionate endorsement of Hillary: pnwmom Jun 2016 #6
Thank you, our party is stronger when we stand together. wisteria Jun 2016 #24
Yes!! moth33 Jun 2016 #27
Great still_one Jun 2016 #28
WooHoo!! missingthebigdog Jun 2016 #31
Third-Way Manny predicted this some time ago! Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #34
Sounds like a rude-pundit wannabe - all that's missing is the F word mdbl Jun 2016 #57
It makes sense pressbox69 Jun 2016 #47
I'd rather see her as Secretary of Treasury.... Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2016 #50
Disappointing ALittleBirdie Jun 2016 #51
Donald Trump just replied, tweeting, "Women shouldn't be allowed to vote..." L. Coyote Jun 2016 #52
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Elizabeth Warren Endorses...»Reply #52