Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Emails in Clinton Probe Dealt With Planned Drone Strikes [View all]
videohead5
(2,945 posts)114. The Emails Did not Originate From Hillary
Washington—Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) today released the following statement on Secretary Hillary Clinton’s emails:
“The latest allegations that Secretary Clinton’s emails include classified information lack the same key information as previous reports.
“First, the 22 emails the State Department has labeled classified are part of seven separate back-and-forth email chains, and none of those email chains originated with Secretary Clinton.
“It has never made sense to me that Secretary Clinton can be held responsible for email exchanges that originated with someone else.
“And second, none of the emails sent to Secretary Clinton have the mandatory markings that are required when classified information is transmitted.
“The only reason to hold Secretary Clinton responsible for emails that didn’t originate with her is for political points, and that’s what we’ve seen over the past several months.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
215 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How is this Right Wing......Are you trying to say that any evidnce that Hillary is corrupt is a
DemMomma4Sanders
Jun 2016
#4
It absolutely shows corruption, not on a scale of the clinton foundations foreign donations from
DemMomma4Sanders
Jun 2016
#15
they didnt need a deal, we had a base therebefore Obama pulled out of Iraq and Saudis
swhisper1
Jun 2016
#194
I prefer to filter out the "facts" that don't suit me at the moment, its less stressful....n/t
Mohammed_Lee
Jun 2016
#10
Former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe is on the News Corp Board of Directors.
OnyxCollie
Jun 2016
#119
Classified info floats all over everyday. 1.4 million of us have TOP security clearance out of
ancianita
Jun 2016
#171
the fact that this was reported right after Obama endorsed Hillary is strange
tomm2thumbs
Jun 2016
#5
The Wall Street Journal is owned by the same man who owns FOX, Ruppert Murdoch.
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#6
Dark ? DU is a community that supports Democratic causes. Hillary is our nominee and, therefore,
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#33
You only wish to bash our nominee because your candidate did not win. You are fooling only
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#39
Trump is not the one pushing this stuff on DU. Did I really have to point the obvious out ?
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#61
Oh jeesh....counterproductive. Are you saying i should be happy to see her buddy buddying up with
DemMomma4Sanders
Jun 2016
#22
The nomination has been decided. It's not about you. It's about our nominee. Time to grow up.
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#23
There's that "me, me, me" again. DU is a "community" that supports Democratic causes.
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#29
No, he did not win the nomination. The Democratic voters chose Hillary to represent our cause.
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#41
Oh so now its not a community, it takes its dictate from the DNC no matter how its membership feels?
DemMomma4Sanders
Jun 2016
#42
You'll have to find someone else to carry on this nonproductive back and forth.
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#43
I'm good. Actually great...because one thing everyone learned from this cycle
DemMomma4Sanders
Jun 2016
#45
Why would i get over my "bitterness" until I'm treated more fairly by politicians who eat my tax
DemMomma4Sanders
Jun 2016
#47
No, it's been decided. That's why the President, Senator Warren and Governor O'malley officially
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#36
if she was the nominee, there would be no superdelegates, no convention, no reason for any of it
tomm2thumbs
Jun 2016
#73
The Democrats I know outnumber the Deocrats that you know. And that's why Hillary is our nominee
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#68
So it should be easy to refute what the article said. Wait, no let's attack the source.
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#16
What you are doing is called making a Strawman then tearing it down. No one accused or said Hillary
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#20
No shit!.. Yes, I added a quote from the article that the OP neglected to include.
beastie boy
Jun 2016
#208
Yahoo.com is reprinting the WSJ article and giving WSJ full credit for it.
beastie boy
Jun 2016
#210
So they were unclassified as per a secret arrangement with the State Department and the CIA
Laser102
Jun 2016
#18
"sent via the “low side’’—government slang for a computer system for unclassified matters"
geek tragedy
Jun 2016
#25
That's an important point. She didn't just receive classified info on an unsecure server, she also
leveymg
Jun 2016
#130
Responsible for "vaguely stated" emails which "did not mention "CIA," "drones" or details about
beastie boy
Jun 2016
#100
The operative words in your post are "Some of those emails were not top secret when she got them but
2cannan
Jun 2016
#121
This is what Factcheck.org said the State Dept. report said about classified emails on Clinton's
2cannan
Jun 2016
#147
There are 3 systems: DOS NIPR email, Secure SIPR (to Secret), and Interagency JWICS (to TS/SAP)
leveymg
Jun 2016
#136
No. Saying that after-hours, she knowingly used only a nonsecure private system to send messages to
leveymg
Jun 2016
#193
No. She refused to touch a keyboard. She never directly accessessed the Secure SIPR.
leveymg
Jun 2016
#132
"These would be the ones provided/briefed B5" "Can they be secure faxed?" "Portions are classified"
leveymg
Jun 2016
#205
You didn't provide a link to your claim. I googled and only link was Fox news and a few RW Bloggers.
Fla Dem
Jun 2016
#175
Except that the Secretary of State receives the PDB Monday - Saturday and at least 50% of that comes
24601
Jun 2016
#103
You know, I thought I had read that before! Thank you Gothmog. It wasn't a senior moment. LOL
Laser102
Jun 2016
#67
You have to read the statutes to understand that intent is not a requirement for 18 USC 793(f).
leveymg
Jun 2016
#126
Yep. Transmiting "some emails" "which did not mention the "CIA," "drones" or details about
beastie boy
Jun 2016
#109
She was aware that her Blackberry and server were uncertified for classified info.
leveymg
Jun 2016
#137
These emails expose the USG decision-making process involved in targeted killings using drones
leveymg
Jun 2016
#128
If the emails contained discussions among US officials about targeted kills, they're classified.
leveymg
Jun 2016
#148
Once again, the emails in question DO NOT contain discussion about targeted kills.
beastie boy
Jun 2016
#151
Yes, we already know this. These have been discussed before. They are the emails that were also
OKNancy
Jun 2016
#117