Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Jerry442

(1,265 posts)

11. Agreements between private parties aren't subject to...

Reply to alp227 (Original post)

Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:05 AM

Jun 2016

...the "guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" test. If you're, say, a security guard at a bank, and there is some suspicion that you were involved in an armed robbery, your job is toast, even if the evidence falls short of what would be needed for a conviction.

Sadly, this would still be true if you were just some hapless shmoe who was in the wrong place at the wrong time. It's hard to be perfect.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Expelled Basketball Player Sues Yale [View all] alp227 Jun 2016 OP

Was he criminally charged? bluestateguy Jun 2016 #1

No, Montague was not charged. alp227 Jun 2016 #2

The thing is Title IX essentially requires it because rape convictions are so rare Recursion Jun 2016 #3

The standard of evidence is lower skepticscott Jun 2016 #4

Exactly. It's not even comparable to jail; it's the non-completion of a private party contract Recursion Jun 2016 #5

There would also be a huge social stigma incurred daleo Jun 2016 #13

There's a push to make it more severe. Igel Jun 2016 #14

I agree. Criminal acts should be handled by the police and the justice system. Nitram Jun 2016 #7

If you can trust the justice system christx30 Jun 2016 #18

As a woman, a mother of a woman, and grandmother of a young woman, I have only secondwind Jun 2016 #6

Your statement leads to the inference that you are arguing from a position where you haven't even 24601 Jun 2016 #8

This person has not been convicted of any crime oberliner Jun 2016 #10

The Stanford rapist was convicted of a crime oberliner Jun 2016 #9

Yes. Igel Jun 2016 #15

That was the Stanford guy oberliner Jun 2016 #17

Agreements between private parties aren't subject to... Jerry442 Jun 2016 #11

This is true. Igel Jun 2016 #16

He should have applied to Baylor rather than Yale. Much better fit. LanternWaste Jun 2016 #12

As a former University Police Officer............. mrmpa Jun 2016 #19

Athletes > everyone else Thav Jun 2016 #20