Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Hayduke Bomgarte

(1,965 posts)

20. Again

Reply to Angel Martin (Reply #19)

Fri Jun 10, 2016, 04:38 PM

Jun 2016

Reading comprehension is your friend. You really must try it sometime.

If that is too difficult, refer to my remarks in reply #14, in which I clearly clarified what you ask about. Oh never mind. It would require reading comprehension.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ruling on concealed weapons keeps applications on hold [View all] onehandle Jun 2016 OP

How come Feinstein and Boxer Angel Martin Jun 2016 #1

How come Wayne LaPierre would kick a gun nut in the balls if it made him more money? onehandle Jun 2016 #2

Probably because they were able to actually show "good cause" and in their case the good cause is cstanleytech Jun 2016 #5

Because the wingnuts constantly threaten them scscholar Jun 2016 #30

Sheriff doesn't want to get on her bad side... TipTok Jun 2016 #36

Bingo ! Angel Martin Jun 2016 #39

4 to 4 and the lower court ruling stands. n/t paleotn Jun 2016 #3

Yeah, this could be about to get rather interesting. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #10

Stands TeddyR Jun 2016 #17

Am I the only one that thinks this is silly? phazed0 Jun 2016 #4

Open carry is for suckers, IMO. 7962 Jun 2016 #7

+1 I agree. phazed0 Jun 2016 #8

exactly ! Angel Martin Jun 2016 #13

IMHO the problem with open carry is that it's time is gone. NWCorona Jun 2016 #22

Personally, if forced to choose Hayduke Bomgarte Jun 2016 #9

It just is that open carry seems to cause conflict... phazed0 Jun 2016 #11

so what about Boxer and Feinstein ? n/t Angel Martin Jun 2016 #14

I dunno, what about 'em? Hayduke Bomgarte Jun 2016 #18

"I realize I've implied armed citizens are nuts" Angel Martin Jun 2016 #19

Again Hayduke Bomgarte Jun 2016 #20

Your blanket accusation that all are "nuts" is ridiculous. 7962 Jun 2016 #23

As I said in subsequent post to replies to Hayduke Bomgarte Jun 2016 #24

This message was self-deleted by its author 7962 Jun 2016 #25

You..... paleotn Jun 2016 #31

Depending on your state... TipTok Jun 2016 #37

... but likely Constitutional askeptic Jun 2016 #12

Background checks... all for it. phazed0 Jun 2016 #15

police for protection DustyJoe Jun 2016 #32

Limiting permits to celebrities and the politically connected is perfectly reasonable hack89 Jun 2016 #6

LOL ! nt Angel Martin Jun 2016 #16

"May issue:" one of those remnants of Jim (large, raucous black bird) Laws. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #21

Depends on what restrictions the "may" include. 7962 Jun 2016 #26

The restrictions of may issue sarisataka Jun 2016 #28

Trouble is, the "may issue" standards vary from sheriff to sheriff -- another JC characteistic. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #40

May issue = corrupt issue. pablo_marmol Jun 2016 #29

Some good news!!!! guillaumeb Jun 2016 #27

Gun culture defenders in this thread... onehandle Jun 2016 #33

Are you trying to say we should ignore the Constitution? askeptic Jun 2016 #35

Your life should always be reason enough for a CC permit. ileus Jun 2016 #34

Controller types are absolutely comfortable with you losing your life... TipTok Jun 2016 #38

Being gay should now be an adequate reason for a CC in California. roamer65 Jun 2016 #41