Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Democrats want 'major role' for Sanders: Reuters/Ipsos poll [View all]ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)have been trying to say ALL ALONG! To those who "think" ALL the inconsistencies with voting in SO VERY MANY Primaries are a fabrication and simply unhappy "sore losers" might well take note.
THIS COUNTRY should take a long hard look at how we vote and WHY voting has become so complex and hard to understand that it's actually UN-DEMOCRATIC! I for one have doubted for a very long time that the final outcomes are accurate. Not only did exit polls show something different, I have worked as a poll watcher and have seen things that I questioned but could NEVER get a real answer for.
I do not care what anyone here wants to call me or how they want to attack me, far too much went on and WON'T be proven until AFTER this election. I saw a LOT here in Florida back in 2000 and spoke out about it then and it wasn't until much later that real PROOF was shown that Bush did not win!
That was 16 years ago and rigging went on then, just think for a moment how refined this ART of VOTING MANIPULATION has advanced in much the same way as technology in all walks of life has done.
You could probably take polls for 1000 people at a time many times over and the outcome will be the same. If our voting system isn't made more uniform and OPEN it will only get MUCH worse. In the beginning I realize that many people didn't know who Bernie was, but as time went along his following grew by leaps and bounds. I know that here in FL our Primary was very early and Bernie's name was just catching on and many voted absentee BEFORE the Primary date. I said little then, but as HIS movement grew there was far too much to ignore.
The goal of THIS Democratic Party was to make sure he was made to look like some sort of fool. I KNOW who I think the fools are!