Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)

24. Na'. It's a lack of paying attention on your part.

Reply to Scuba (Reply #22)

Wed Jun 15, 2016, 01:44 AM

Jun 2016

Last edited Wed Jun 15, 2016, 10:15 AM - Edit history (1)

Don't put that on Obama. That's on you. If you had paid attention at all the last couple years, especially when it's come to these cases, you'd know Obama supports net neutrality and it was his FCC that made this order.

Pay more attention and don't pawn off your ignorance on some bullshit excuse that you can't trust Obama.

lol

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Appeals Court Hands Obama Administration Major Win In Net Neutrality Case [View all] Grassy Knoll Jun 2016 OP

Court upholds �net neutrality' rules for Internet access bemildred Jun 2016 #1

The FCC got over 400,000 emails from people like us. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2016 #16

Epic kick Blue_Tires Jun 2016 #2

Trump winning will mean an end to it Ohioblue22 Jun 2016 #3

We must keep him from winning. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2016 #4

I'm saddened that I have to read the details to know if the headline is a good or bad thing. Scuba Jun 2016 #5

I was thinking the same thing. Sad indeed. n/t arcane1 Jun 2016 #10

Add me to that list, too. :( n/t Jim Lane Jun 2016 #18

lol.. disillusioned73 Jun 2016 #12

"AT&T immediately announced it would appeal the ruling, saying it's always expected the issue... Miles Archer Jun 2016 #13

Yeah, they will keep chipping away at it. passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #15

I'm curious... montana_hazeleyes Jun 2016 #21

A lack of trust, but I only speak for myself. Scuba Jun 2016 #22

Na'. It's a lack of paying attention on your part. Drunken Irishman Jun 2016 #24

You don't know much about me ... Scuba Jun 2016 #26

Clearly I do... Drunken Irishman Jun 2016 #27

I didn't force Obama to pick a telecomm industry insider to protect net neutrality. He did that. Scuba Jun 2016 #28

lol Drunken Irishman Jun 2016 #29

Yeah, me too. mountain grammy Jun 2016 #23

Tom Wheeler defeats the broadband industry: Net neutrality wins in court Sgent Jun 2016 #6

Good, hopefully it will also survive any SCOTUS challenge as well. NT cstanleytech Jun 2016 #7

That's what I was thinking too...nt 2naSalit Jun 2016 #9

right now at 4-4 it probably will rurallib Jun 2016 #11

Not to mention more Democratic controlled state governments since the Republican ones are corrupt. cstanleytech Jun 2016 #17

Thank wonders for small and what-should-be-obvious victories.. sheesh.. NT vkkv Jun 2016 #8

"legal under current law" Equinox Moon Jun 2016 #14

Exactly. Money buys influence. It is all too easy for those with Dark n Stormy Knight Jun 2016 #19

Great news but removing roadblocks to community wifi would be even better lostnfound Jun 2016 #20

GOOD! BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2016 #25