Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Breaking: Democrats Halt The Senate, Launch Filibuster For Gun Control [View all]NoMoreRepugs
(11,887 posts)25. let's hope someone in the Dem hierarchy is smart enough to make the
same observation and that it becomes a TV ad somewhere down the line
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Breaking: Democrats Halt The Senate, Launch Filibuster For Gun Control [View all]
underahedgerow
Jun 2016
OP
Or they're talking within the context of economic rather than social issues. nt
MisterFred
Jun 2016
#43
The public needs to hear - loudly - that Republicans are blocking all gun laws.
Chemisse
Jun 2016
#14
anyone have handy a link to the wording of the proposal increasing background checks?
HereSince1628
Jun 2016
#24
And we can restrict which types of guns, ammo and magazines w/o violating the Constitution. nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#55
Why not have the guns stay as a possession of the gun club/shooting range then?
Humanist_Activist
Jun 2016
#62
I could understand it 200 years ago, when there were no Police forces or indeed American Military.
OnDoutside
Jun 2016
#73
Its well known that if you are breaking into a house, you will be shot first
Travis_0004
Jun 2016
#80
Any evidence of you claim that high rates of gun ownership reduce crime?
Humanist_Activist
Jun 2016
#81
Should or need are not ascribed to rights. You aren't required to demonstrate the need to speak
24601
Jun 2016
#71
Bit of a difference between speaking freely and blowing someone's head off because you were angry
OnDoutside
Jun 2016
#72
Absolutely agree that speaking & killing are different. But it's a small percentage of gunowners,
24601
Jun 2016
#74
Well I wouldn't want them seal team trained, but certainly trained to respect the weapon they own.
OnDoutside
Jun 2016
#75
Some people love authoritarian government when their party is in charge. I wonder if they'd be
Just reading posts
Jun 2016
#53
YOU CAN TAKE PART AND MAKE THIS AN EVEN STRONGER STATEMENT! Here's HOW!!!!!
ISeeA BrightFuture
Jun 2016
#33
The word "halt" makes it appear the Senate was actually doing anything prior to this.
LS_Editor
Jun 2016
#37
Trump is meeting with the NRA who blames Obama for inaction and playing politics with this issue
bucolic_frolic
Jun 2016
#41
Until we have Paul Ryan as House Minority Leader, it will die in the House
Feeling the Bern
Jun 2016
#60
His closing remarks were so powerful. That story needs to be shared more. nt
eastwestdem
Jun 2016
#70