Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Calista241

(5,633 posts)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:56 PM Jun 2016

Freddie Gray trial: expert witness crumbles in van driver's prosecution [View all]

Source: The Guardian

Prosecutors seeking murder charges over Freddie Gray’s death rested their case against Caesar Goodson on Wednesday with an expert witness who crumbled under cross-examination. His testimony was the latest of several blows in the trial that experts say is prosecutors’ best shot at getting a conviction for Gray’s death.

Witness Stanford O’Neill Franklin, a former police commander, was called to support the prosecution’s theory that Gray suffered what is known as a “rough ride”, a practice in which a driver jolts and takes sharp turns, jostling a prisoner who is handcuffed and shackled without a seatbelt.

But when asked by defense attorney Matthew Fraling whether he saw any evidence of Goodson’s erratic driving, he couldn’t say.

Asked if, in reviewing footage of the van’s stops, he saw evidence of unexpected starts, stops, or turns, Franklin answered: “I did not.”

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/16/freddie-gray-trial-caesar-goodson-rough-ride-prosecution



This trial is a farce. Either they are throwing it intentionally, or they have no evidence and are conducting a show trial.
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hmm I am leaning towards show trial which irks me because they are wasting alot of money, time cstanleytech Jun 2016 #1
I have a problem claiming there is no evidence of malfeasance.... Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2016 #2
Careful Blandocyte Jun 2016 #3
In a criminal trial you have to go beyond reasonable doubt anigbrowl Jun 2016 #9
So, if the guy was genuinely this incompetent Kelvin Mace Jun 2016 #4
Ex police officer is star witness for the defense... Taitertots Jun 2016 #5
They can't have a rough ride being their theory of the case Calista241 Jun 2016 #6
I agree. That's why it's inexcusable to call an "expert"... Taitertots Jun 2016 #7
Wait for the verdict. Igel Jun 2016 #8
That's the trouble I have understanding Mosby and her motivations... TipTok Jun 2016 #10
Gray got seriously injured by the police actions. joshcryer Jun 2016 #11
She overcharged ... TipTok Jun 2016 #12
No, she is young, she just didn't go in the right direction. joshcryer Jun 2016 #13
You can't speak to her true motivations any more than I can... TipTok Jun 2016 #14
I disagree, inexperience is a legitimate excuse. joshcryer Jun 2016 #15
It does make them wrong... TipTok Jun 2016 #16
I can't disagree. joshcryer Jun 2016 #18
You can't put people on trial just because. Calista241 Jun 2016 #19
You can as this trial shows... TipTok Jun 2016 #20
The angry mob demanded prosecutions and they got them Freddie Stubbs Jun 2016 #17
This whole thing is ridiculous. Something needs to be done to our justice system. nt eastwestdem Jun 2016 #21
What would you suggest? philosslayer Jun 2016 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Freddie Gray trial: exper...