Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: GMO foods don't need special label, American Medical Assn. says [View all]stockholmer
(3,751 posts)82. It IS illegal to label food as not containing GMO, you really dont know what you are talking about
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/09/18/fda-labeled-free-modification/
Extra labeling only confuses the consumer, biotech spokesman says
That the Food and Drug Administration is opposed to labeling foods that are genetically modified is no surprise anymore, but a report in the Washington Post indicates the FDA wont even allow food producers to label their foods as being free of genetic modification.
In reporting that the FDA will likely not require the labeling of genetically modified salmon if it approves the food product for consumption, the Posts Lyndsey Layton notes that the federal agency wont let conventional food makers trumpet the fact that their products dont contain genetically modified ingredients.
The agency warned the dairy industry in 1994 that it could not use Hormone Free labeling on milk from cows that are not given engineered hormones, because all milk contains some hormones.
It has sent a flurry of enforcement letters to food makers, including B&G Foods, which was told it could not use the phrase GMO-free on its Polaner All Fruit strawberry spread label because GMO refers to genetically modified organisms and strawberries are produce, not organisms. It told the maker of Spectrum Canola Oil that it could not use a label that included a red circle with a line through it and the words GMO, saying the symbol suggested that there was something wrong with genetically engineered food.
snip
--------------------------------------------------------
Genetically Modified Foods: More Reason to Avoid Them; Why They Threaten Organic Agriculture
http://www.anh-usa.org/genetically-modified-food-more-reason-to-avoid-them-and-why-they-threaten-organic-agriculture/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.non-gmoreport.com/articles/millenium/fdadisallowsgmo-freelabel.php
FDA's new regulations won't allow non-GMO, GMO-free label
New regulations propose strict guidelines for voluntary labeling of non-GMO productsIn mid-January, the US Food and Drug Administration announced new regulations requiring biotechnology companies to consult with the FDA at least 120 days before marketing new GM foods. Previously, such consultations were voluntary. Biotech companies must provide health safety data about the new GM foods to the FDA, and the agency said it would make this information available on the Internet.
While biotechnology and food industry representatives praised the new regulations, consumer and environmental groups criticized them, saying they didn't go far enough, particularly in terms of labeling GM foods. The FDA rejected consumer demands for labeling.
Notable for companies wanting to advertise products as non-genetically modified is the fact that the FDA says it will not allow labels like "GM-free," "GMO-Free" or "biotech-free." The agency says guaranteeing a product to be free of GM material is virtually impossible. Instead the labels will have to say the food was not produced through bioengineering. The FDA said it may take legal action against companies that violate these guidelines.
Recently, a U.S.-European biotechnology committee had recommended that the U.S. strengthen regulations on GM foods, including labeling. The Consumers Federation of America had also issued a report criticizing the current U.S. regulations. Editorials calling for labeling GM foods have appeared in major U.S. newspapers, including The Los Angeles Times, Boston Globe, Christian Science Monitor, and Des Moines Register in the past year.
Comment on the FDA's new regulations
The FDA's new regulations are open to public comment. The FDA will take comments on the premarket review until April 3, 2001 and the labeling guidelines until March 19. To comment on the new regulations, visit http://www.fda.gov. Scroll down the page to the section titled, "Let us hear from you," then click on the heading "Tell us your views on FDA's proposed regulations." The regulations are found in the following FDA dockets:
Docket No. 00N-1396, CFSAN 74. "Premarket Notice Concerning Bioengineered Foods."
Docket No. 00D-1598, CFSAN 123. "Draft Guidance for Industry: Voluntary Labeling Indicating Whether Foods Have or Have Not Been Developed Using Bioengineering; Availability."
Extra labeling only confuses the consumer, biotech spokesman says
That the Food and Drug Administration is opposed to labeling foods that are genetically modified is no surprise anymore, but a report in the Washington Post indicates the FDA wont even allow food producers to label their foods as being free of genetic modification.
In reporting that the FDA will likely not require the labeling of genetically modified salmon if it approves the food product for consumption, the Posts Lyndsey Layton notes that the federal agency wont let conventional food makers trumpet the fact that their products dont contain genetically modified ingredients.
The agency warned the dairy industry in 1994 that it could not use Hormone Free labeling on milk from cows that are not given engineered hormones, because all milk contains some hormones.
It has sent a flurry of enforcement letters to food makers, including B&G Foods, which was told it could not use the phrase GMO-free on its Polaner All Fruit strawberry spread label because GMO refers to genetically modified organisms and strawberries are produce, not organisms. It told the maker of Spectrum Canola Oil that it could not use a label that included a red circle with a line through it and the words GMO, saying the symbol suggested that there was something wrong with genetically engineered food.
snip
--------------------------------------------------------
Genetically Modified Foods: More Reason to Avoid Them; Why They Threaten Organic Agriculture
http://www.anh-usa.org/genetically-modified-food-more-reason-to-avoid-them-and-why-they-threaten-organic-agriculture/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.non-gmoreport.com/articles/millenium/fdadisallowsgmo-freelabel.php
FDA's new regulations won't allow non-GMO, GMO-free label
New regulations propose strict guidelines for voluntary labeling of non-GMO productsIn mid-January, the US Food and Drug Administration announced new regulations requiring biotechnology companies to consult with the FDA at least 120 days before marketing new GM foods. Previously, such consultations were voluntary. Biotech companies must provide health safety data about the new GM foods to the FDA, and the agency said it would make this information available on the Internet.
While biotechnology and food industry representatives praised the new regulations, consumer and environmental groups criticized them, saying they didn't go far enough, particularly in terms of labeling GM foods. The FDA rejected consumer demands for labeling.
Notable for companies wanting to advertise products as non-genetically modified is the fact that the FDA says it will not allow labels like "GM-free," "GMO-Free" or "biotech-free." The agency says guaranteeing a product to be free of GM material is virtually impossible. Instead the labels will have to say the food was not produced through bioengineering. The FDA said it may take legal action against companies that violate these guidelines.
Recently, a U.S.-European biotechnology committee had recommended that the U.S. strengthen regulations on GM foods, including labeling. The Consumers Federation of America had also issued a report criticizing the current U.S. regulations. Editorials calling for labeling GM foods have appeared in major U.S. newspapers, including The Los Angeles Times, Boston Globe, Christian Science Monitor, and Des Moines Register in the past year.
Comment on the FDA's new regulations
The FDA's new regulations are open to public comment. The FDA will take comments on the premarket review until April 3, 2001 and the labeling guidelines until March 19. To comment on the new regulations, visit http://www.fda.gov. Scroll down the page to the section titled, "Let us hear from you," then click on the heading "Tell us your views on FDA's proposed regulations." The regulations are found in the following FDA dockets:
Docket No. 00N-1396, CFSAN 74. "Premarket Notice Concerning Bioengineered Foods."
Docket No. 00D-1598, CFSAN 123. "Draft Guidance for Industry: Voluntary Labeling Indicating Whether Foods Have or Have Not Been Developed Using Bioengineering; Availability."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
196 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If big ag is so proud of their GMO creations why don't they label them as such and market them?
ag_dude
Jun 2012
#14
as many countries have. A chance in hell we can ban it here in US? Labeling is a compromise
Voice for Peace
Jul 2014
#169
The Indiana State Medical Association and the Illinois State Medical Society urge labeling (2012).
proverbialwisdom
Jun 2012
#47
See genetically engineered bovine growth hormone fiasco, rBGH (breast/prostate cancer rates go up).
proverbialwisdom
Jun 2012
#51
The American Academy Of Environmental Medicine Calls For Moratorium On GM Foods (2009).
proverbialwisdom
Jun 2012
#54
One of Upton Sinclair's antagonists in The Jungle argued that very thing...
LanternWaste
Jun 2012
#37
It IS illegal to label food as not containing GMO, you really dont know what you are talking about
stockholmer
Jun 2012
#82
"Who said you should be required to buy food that you don't want to buy?"
A Simple Game
Jun 2012
#68
A Comparison of the Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health
PostCapitalist
Jun 2012
#74
Monsanto GMO's linked to organ failure + GMO causes sterility in lab animals in 3 generations + more
stockholmer
Jun 2012
#81
I don't think that consumer choice requires a scientific justification...
LanternWaste
Aug 2012
#153
Actually there is a good reason not to label because nearly all processed foods do contain GMO
yellowcanine
Jun 2012
#125
Yeah, everybody's so healthy that we should just accept the status quo.
proverbialwisdom
Jun 2012
#127
seriously rat poison (you probably know already, it made the rats very sick.)
Voice for Peace
Aug 2012
#158
I don't get your question, & believe you may be trying to bait me so I'll decline to engage, thanks.
Voice for Peace
Jul 2014
#184
I would rather have physicians making recommendations about food safety than politicians.
yellowcanine
Jun 2012
#126
No what they are saying is that the GM process does not inherently make food less safe.
yellowcanine
Jun 2012
#129
Almost all processed foods contain GMO. So labeling is pretty much useless.
yellowcanine
Jun 2012
#133
Labeling is done in at least 49 countries worldwide and alternatives to GMOsourced food exist there.
proverbialwisdom
Jun 2012
#134
"Labeling is done in 49 countries" is not a valid argument. Look up "is/ought fallacy"
yellowcanine
Jun 2012
#145
Regardless, I would still like to know if the food I'm eating has been genetically altered.
Arkansas Granny
Jun 2012
#7
What's wrong with just being able to glance at any food package and tell if it has GMO ingredients?
Fumesucker
Jun 2012
#13
The issue is that the consumer has a right to know what they are purchasing.
Arkansas Granny
Jun 2012
#26
I don't recall that I have ever seen a label that says a food is NOT GMO.
Arkansas Granny
Jun 2012
#43
Yes I have. On some food items we are starting to see "No GMO's" "No BGH"..
PostCapitalist
Jun 2012
#75
Yep. Too bad the air quality of DU goes down with every outburst of trollish flatulence.
freshwest
Jun 2012
#88
The repetition is a dead give away, and the smell. You just can't escape... Le Sigh...
freshwest
Jun 2012
#92
7/6/12 NEWS - The 'Monsanto Rider': Are Biotech Companies About to Gain Immunity from Federal Law?
proverbialwisdom
Jul 2012
#147
That's way too pessimistic. I think a huge brawl is happening within the AMA over this (post #47).
proverbialwisdom
Jun 2012
#76
Do you know how your Senator voted on the Sanders-Boxer amendment to permit states to require labels
proverbialwisdom
Jun 2012
#86
Processed food additives from soy, corn, canola, sugar beets, cottonseed are GMO unless organic.
proverbialwisdom
Jun 2012
#97
Food Rules by Michael Pollan provides a simple guide without mentioning the term GMO.
proverbialwisdom
Jun 2012
#103
Fair point, and thanks, but that poster was talking about produce, saying sticker provides a clue
DisgustipatedinCA
Jun 2012
#106
I simultaneously feel that we're both on the same side, and that you just want to be confrontational
DisgustipatedinCA
Jun 2012
#110
Defeatist malarky or, rather, wishful thinking by fake food biz considering abysmal health outcomes.
proverbialwisdom
Jun 2012
#116
I'm very disappointed to see the number of Democrats voting nay with the Republican on this.
RainbowSuperfund
Jun 2012
#122
It may not be a question of need in the minds of the AMA but it is a question of what the public
Citizen Worker
Jun 2012
#98
Deciphering supermarket code system of fruits/veggies to find out if GMO:
mother earth
Jun 2012
#119
Just say if the code starts with 8, then the item is GMO; if it starts with 9, it cannot be GMO.
proverbialwisdom
Jun 2012
#120
Yes, certainly simplify to whatever suits your needs, but there is much confusion in "organic" & the
mother earth
Jun 2012
#121
What are you talking about? "GMO organics" do not exist, nor should they, despite what GMO co. want.
proverbialwisdom
Jun 2012
#123
Marketing/labeling organics when they aren't...that's what I mean, hence the confusion for the
mother earth
Jun 2012
#140
17 June 2012, EarthOpenSource Report: "GMO Myths and Truths, An evidence-based examination..."
proverbialwisdom
Jun 2012
#124
Old MacDonald had a Farm, E-I-E-I-O. With a gmo here and a gmo there...
proverbialwisdom
Jun 2012
#135
Friends of the Earth News Release: Going GM-Free in Europe but not USA.
proverbialwisdom
Jun 2012
#136
They might want to reconsider after reading this article posted in another thread:
RainbowSuperfund
Jun 2012
#138
Mother Jones:"Food Industry Ditches Trans Fats, Kids' Cholesterol Levels Drop"
proverbialwisdom
Aug 2012
#149