Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dixiegrrrrl

(60,157 posts)
10. Here's how it works:
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 10:15 PM
Jun 2016

You drop a Democracy drone into a group of people.
Usually a group gathered for a wedding or a funeral, 'cause it is a more "target enriched environment".

Then you send some other people to go count what ever body parts are left.
Any and all parts count as a militant, or an insurgent, or a rebel, belonging to the "bad" side which is Al-Quada, or the Taliban, or
anti-government troops, or ISIS, etc.
then the Pentagon writes a line or 2 about the attack, using one or more of the first parts and one of the group names.

and there you have it. We have to be at war cause there are evidently bad guys, as proven by all the drones we had to fire.

And no, I am not making this up. News groups like the Intercept have written about the military admitting they count all pieces of pulp after a strike as "the enemy", no matter what age, what sex, etc.

Just like troops in Viet Nam used ears for a body count report.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If only we'd had "boots on the ground"... Aristus Jun 2016 #1
So the war won't be ending anytime soon then? n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #2
Yay, Team Bushie! Blandocyte Jun 2016 #3
I thought ISIS started in a different place. seabeckind Jun 2016 #5
The article is about the Taliban though not ISIS. nt cstanleytech Jun 2016 #14
Yes. My reply included ISIS Blandocyte Jun 2016 #24
Run this by me again... seabeckind Jun 2016 #4
If we left tomorrow, within a few months christx30 Jun 2016 #7
Here's how it works: dixiegrrrrl Jun 2016 #10
I still say we give them a nuke. Archae Jun 2016 #6
USA! USA! USA! Pastiche423 Jun 2016 #8
USA/NATO can win the "war", but ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #9
The part you can't grasp is that they ARE fighting for their own lives. seabeckind Jun 2016 #12
I understand what you are saying. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #15
You keep confusing opposition with apathy. seabeckind Jun 2016 #16
I would love to see it as you do. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #17
What is the precise definition of "winning" in the particular context of Afghanistan? LanternWaste Jun 2016 #18
Winning: ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #20
We should leave Afghan to the Afghanis. Didn't we learn anything from history? glennward Jun 2016 #11
Oh WE learned quite well. seabeckind Jun 2016 #13
Time to make peace jzodda Jun 2016 #19
The Taliban don't want peace. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #21
A tactics change gets the Taliban more ground with less fighting. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #22
We could have avoided the whole war... Octafish Jun 2016 #23
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The Taliban now hold more...»Reply #10