Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)Clinton IT specialist invokes the Fifth 100+ times [View all]
Source: The Hill
But he declined to answer questions, his lawyers said, in part due to the federal governments decision to grant him limited immunity as part of its ongoing criminal probe related to the server and the possibility that classified information was mishandled.
After a back-and-forth between the two legal teams, Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled this month that the details of that immunity deal could remain secret.
Unlike in criminal cases, judges in civil suits are allowed to draw inferences from a witnesss decision not to answer questions, potentially increasing the likelihood that Clinton herself is asked to testify as part of the Judicial Watch lawsuit. Clintons campaign would surely vigorously oppose any request for her to appear, and the event could dramatically shake up the presidential race.
Judicial Watch has filed multiple open records lawsuits related to Clintons exclusive use of a private email account and server while serving as the nations top diplomat. Depositions have been granted in two of those cases, and the decision in a third was this week put on hold pending the outcomes of those two other cases.
Two other former aides are scheduled to be interviewed before the end of the month: longtime deputy Huma Abedin and Undersecretary for Management Patrick Kennedy.
After a back-and-forth between the two legal teams, Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled this month that the details of that immunity deal could remain secret.
Unlike in criminal cases, judges in civil suits are allowed to draw inferences from a witnesss decision not to answer questions, potentially increasing the likelihood that Clinton herself is asked to testify as part of the Judicial Watch lawsuit. Clintons campaign would surely vigorously oppose any request for her to appear, and the event could dramatically shake up the presidential race.
Judicial Watch has filed multiple open records lawsuits related to Clintons exclusive use of a private email account and server while serving as the nations top diplomat. Depositions have been granted in two of those cases, and the decision in a third was this week put on hold pending the outcomes of those two other cases.
Two other former aides are scheduled to be interviewed before the end of the month: longtime deputy Huma Abedin and Undersecretary for Management Patrick Kennedy.
Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/284481-clinton-it-specialist-invokes-the-fifth-100-times
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Do you grok why his answering questions truthfully under oath would harm any investigation?
merrily
Jun 2016
#45
It could harm his position in the criminal case if he is a target (which we don't know either way)
JonLeibowitz
Jun 2016
#54
The right not to testify *if* so doing might tend to show you were guilty of a crime.
merrily
Jun 2016
#36
The fact is the IT person invoked the 5th over a hundred times-or don't you care about truth?
bobthedrummer
Jun 2016
#9
I agree it's a perception managed political show pre-trial worthy of historical comparisons.
bobthedrummer
Jun 2016
#18
As I am sure you know a judge has jurisdiction to rule on objections in the deposition.
former9thward
Jun 2016
#40
Indeed. And any lawyer who calls a judge during a depo better have a good reason
msanthrope
Jun 2016
#57
The fact is, screenwriter Adrian Scott also pleaded the fifth seventy-seven times in front of HUAC
LanternWaste
Jun 2016
#15
Is anyone suggesting he be forced to testify, even if so doing would incriminate him?
merrily
Jun 2016
#37
A person can "take the fifth" for any number of reasons, and we don't know....
George II
Jun 2016
#6
Judicial Watch is never going to let up. If this lawsuit goes away, they'll file
pnwmom
Jun 2016
#14
"Judicial Watch has filed multiple open records lawsuits" All this BS is part of the RW master plan.
winstars
Jun 2016
#16
I disagree. The judge has already said that Hillary's testimony might be needed depending
NWCorona
Jun 2016
#32
That doesnt mean to much since few judges are willing to paint themselves into the corner
cstanleytech
Jun 2016
#56