Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: CLINTON FAILED TO HAND OVER KEY EMAIL TO STATE DEPARTMENT [View all]SusanLarson
(284 posts)35. Oh really?
It may be from Fox News but even they can't manufacture quotes from the FBI director.
"Hillary Clinton for months has downplayed the FBI investigation into her private email server and practices as a mere security inquiry.
But when asked Wednesday by Fox News about Clinton's characterization of the bureau's probe, FBI Director James Comey said he doesnt know what "security inquiry" means -- adding, Were conducting an investigation. Thats what we do.
The FBI director reiterated that hes not familiar with the term security inquiry when told that is the phrase Clinton has used."
Here's another one from Vice Media..
In a separate, public declaration filed by Hardy in March, he said any documents the FBI retrieved from Clinton's email server, which would be responsive to VICE News' FOIA request, "are potential evidence in the FBI's investigation, or may provide leads to or context for potential evidence" and are exempt from disclosure under FOIA because they would be deemed law enforcement records.
"As this is an active and ongoing investigation, the FBI is continuing to assess the evidentiary value of any materials retrieved for the investigation from any such server equipment/related devices," the filing said. "Disclosure of evidence, potential evidence, or information that has not yet been assessed for evidentiary value while the investigation is active and ongoing could reasonably be expected to undermine the pending investigation by prematurely revealing its scope and focus."
In a footnote to the new declaration filed Monday night, Hardy said, "Due to the sensitive nature of the investigation, the number of FBI personnel and involved in and having knowledge of the pending investigation is limited."
What about directly from Barack Obama's White House?
Barack Obama's spokesman described the FBI's probe into Hillary Clinton's classified email scandal as a 'criminal investigation' on Thursday, less than an hour after the president endorsed his embattled former secretary of state to succeed him.
Josh Earnest told reporters during a White House press briefing that Obama was committed to keeping his hands off the investigation, trusting career investigators and prosecutors to follow evidence wherever it leads.
'That's what their responsibility is,' Earnest said. 'And that's why the president, when discussing this issue in each stage, has reiterated his commitment to this principle that any criminal investigation should be conducted independent of any sort of political interference.'
Then you have the fact that they don't give immunity to people, unless there is a planned prosecution, now it may not be directed at Clinton but it is news, and it is legimate.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
172 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"her use of a private homebrew email server, the State Department confirmed Thursday...."
L. Coyote
Jun 2016
#76
What does Benghazi have to do with whether Hillary turned over all her emails?
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2016
#135
Those who keep focusing on Hillary's past are doomed to a future of President Con-artist tRump.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2016
#159
"no one else in the government, has ever said there's even an investigation. " <-- that's bs
99th_Monkey
Jun 2016
#40
That's true, but, whether there's an investigation or not, we've hitched our wagon to Hillary... not gonna change horses mid-stream. So why bother with this crap now?
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2016
#136
Agreed: this post is a violation of the DU rules: its a primary thing: and it
lewebley3
Jun 2016
#25
No, posting it isnt a violation in and of itself since you can be sure some will probably try to use
cstanleytech
Jun 2016
#53
Of course the investigation is purely an attempt to attack her but that doesn't mean
cstanleytech
Jun 2016
#157
Did you get the letter too from these people.... I'm supposed to "shut my mouth".
Pauldg47
Jun 2016
#31
She had the right to delete personal emails, has been allowed to others and it should
Thinkingabout
Jun 2016
#107
I disagree, emails could have consisted of discussing personal matters between Hillary and
Thinkingabout
Jun 2016
#132
If it were President Bush, we'd all be flipping the fuck out right now.
AtheistCrusader
Jun 2016
#18
Many of the same people also are all for killing off Due Process, and unlawful searches.
Ikonoklast
Jun 2016
#106
It might hurt but will it be enough to derail her vs Trump who has his own baggage?
cstanleytech
Jun 2016
#36
It never ends, does it. What is the point of posting this on DEMOCRATIC Underground?
George II
Jun 2016
#21
I was under the impression that posting right wing generated crap wasn't allowed here anymore. n/t
NNadir
Jun 2016
#26
When she becomes President. Not if. This is another pile of you know what. Why is this here?
Laser102
Jun 2016
#85
The AP is right wing? The AP that preemptively declared the nomination for Hillary???
JonLeibowitz
Jun 2016
#83
Oh I thought your comment that it was 'red' was snark about it being RW. apologies.
JonLeibowitz
Jun 2016
#87
BECAUSE THIS IS SO FUCKING IMPORTANT! NO IT'S NOT! I DON'T KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT!
randome
Jun 2016
#88
Hillary Clinton couldn't touch the level of evil set by Dick Cheney in a million years.
tenderfoot
Jun 2016
#99
What exactly is the horrible state secret in this obviously encrypted message?
passiveporcupine
Jun 2016
#100
I got called out above for referencing Benghazi. Someone doesn't see the sarcasm.
CurtEastPoint
Jun 2016
#148
It could be argued that it just got lost due to the sheer volume of emails
cstanleytech
Jun 2016
#143
You might want to reread it because based on that quote I dont see a hope in hell of a perjury
cstanleytech
Jun 2016
#144
Exactly, so unless they have Carnac the Magnificent on call to read her mind they
cstanleytech
Jun 2016
#161