Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Texas Abortion Limits Struck Down by U.S. Supreme Court [View all]mercuryblues
(16,257 posts)64. Texas and other states
have more laws that need to go.
When prayers are your only legal medical options for a failed pregnancy.
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/04/01/cruel-texas-republicans-force-women-deliver-dead-babies.html
The Mahaffey family were desperate for a child and had been praying incessantly for a baby. But when 20-week pregnant Taylor learned her fetus suffered a severe complication with no possible chance of ever surviving, the young couple cried and then prayed for a humane end to their fetus suffering. In fact, doctors and the medical staff cried along with the Mahaffeys; in part because of the couples disappointment and grief, and partly because Texas Republicans passed a law mandating that the mother and fetus had to suffer because they enacted a religion-based fetal pain law.
<snip>
The doctors told the couple The only humane thing to do would be to pop the sack, and let the fetus come into the world and die. However, due to the religious law the doctors were forbidden to induce labor because in Texas it is considered an abortion, and in Texas, abortion is illegal. They sent the couple home to either wait for the fetus to die in utero, or for the mother to begin natural labor so they could deliver the dead baby.
The religious couple prayed constantly for a miracle that might end their babys suffering. The husband was rightly worried his wife would hemorrhage to death and despite the mother had started bleeding, because the fetus heart still beat doctors could not legally interfere. This is going on while the woman was just screaming at them to get the fetus out of her.
The young woman suffered like that for four days and after her waters broke doctors delivered a dead, partially formed baby. Now, this cruelty is not down to the medical professionals in Texas; they desperately wanted to help relieve the religious couples suffering, but religious Republicans said no.
The Mahaffey family were desperate for a child and had been praying incessantly for a baby. But when 20-week pregnant Taylor learned her fetus suffered a severe complication with no possible chance of ever surviving, the young couple cried and then prayed for a humane end to their fetus suffering. In fact, doctors and the medical staff cried along with the Mahaffeys; in part because of the couples disappointment and grief, and partly because Texas Republicans passed a law mandating that the mother and fetus had to suffer because they enacted a religion-based fetal pain law.
<snip>
The doctors told the couple The only humane thing to do would be to pop the sack, and let the fetus come into the world and die. However, due to the religious law the doctors were forbidden to induce labor because in Texas it is considered an abortion, and in Texas, abortion is illegal. They sent the couple home to either wait for the fetus to die in utero, or for the mother to begin natural labor so they could deliver the dead baby.
The religious couple prayed constantly for a miracle that might end their babys suffering. The husband was rightly worried his wife would hemorrhage to death and despite the mother had started bleeding, because the fetus heart still beat doctors could not legally interfere. This is going on while the woman was just screaming at them to get the fetus out of her.
The young woman suffered like that for four days and after her waters broke doctors delivered a dead, partially formed baby. Now, this cruelty is not down to the medical professionals in Texas; they desperately wanted to help relieve the religious couples suffering, but religious Republicans said no.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It has nothing to do with them being lazy they are simply wanting to stack the deck and the
cstanleytech
Jun 2016
#10
Ask Alabama's Chief Justice Roy Moore how well that is working for him to ignore the law.
dixiegrrrrl
Jun 2016
#40
Never doubt the determination of a woman in tennis shoes to stand up for rights.
suffragette
Jun 2016
#70
5-3 decision that will likely wipe out equally onerous laws in other states...Yippppeeeeeee!
Surya Gayatri
Jun 2016
#25
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
hamsterjill
Jun 2016
#28
I agree with you. Kennedy would've succumbed to Scalia's pressure to vote the other way.
no_hypocrisy
Jun 2016
#38
Good news. The women at the coffee shop I'm in here didn't know what Roe v Wade meant.
Eleanors38
Jun 2016
#57
Ginsburg will retire, Kennedy will retire, possibly Breyer too. . .and I heard rumblings that
Feeling the Bern
Jun 2016
#58
I can't imagine that Clarence Thomas will step down, at least not without a GOP president.
StevieM
Jun 2016
#62
So much for trying to use the law of the land to put women in their place.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jun 2016
#82
