Latest Breaking News

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)

16. Thanks. I was out for some time, so couldn't keep checking.

Reply to uppityperson (Reply #14)

Tue Jun 28, 2016, 12:18 PM

Jun 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

54 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court Turns Down Contraceptive Case [View all] Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 OP

They're rolling! merrily Jun 2016 #1

Seems to me the women justices are much more assertive now that Scalia is gone. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #3

There really is a point where bucolic_frolic Jun 2016 #2

The line is being engraved in stone. Enough of imposing your Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #5

be nice if they followed their own leader rurallib Jun 2016 #12

If your religion awoke_in_2003 Jun 2016 #22

Precisely. klook Jun 2016 #26

Exactly, what is more important your religious beliefs or your job? fasttense Jul 2016 #50

Finally women being heard!!! Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #4

Ginsberg, Sotomayor and Kagan are the leaders on this, of course. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #7

Yes! mountain grammy Jun 2016 #11

OK, somebody pinch me. I know what I'm going to be listening to today. TrogL Jun 2016 #6

"One theory is with Scalia gone, Roberts is drifting left." Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #8

Kennedy is the one who keeps siding with the women lately passiveporcupine Jul 2016 #45

Nope, everybody was going on about "Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi" TrogL Jun 2016 #23

A dare we hope that when C.T. Finally retires that... Pluvious Jun 2016 #24

Ginsburg may be the first to retire. passiveporcupine Jul 2016 #46

another bit of good news. the woman-hating gestational slavers must be screaming in niyad Jun 2016 #9

Wow, four good decisions, one weird one. ChairmanAgnostic Jun 2016 #10

RWer Christian taliban vlyons Jun 2016 #13

Here are a couple links, it's across the internets now. Good. uppityperson Jun 2016 #14

Thanks. I was out for some time, so couldn't keep checking. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #16

An interesting note: it takes *4* SCOTUS justices to agree to hear a new case... Princess Turandot Jun 2016 #15

In other words, Repuke inaction on SCOTUS is biting them on the ass...they don't have the certiorari msanthrope Jun 2016 #17

I'm getting the distinct impression, that since the untimely departure of Scalia the Mouth, Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #18

That's sure what it looks like wryter2000 Jun 2016 #29

Read "bullying" him, yeah. That big mouth was daunting for many. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #31

I praise The Mighty Zeus every day for Pluvious Jun 2016 #25

Such great news. Stupendous. Thank you, Surya Gayatri. n/t Judi Lynn Jun 2016 #19

The SCOTUS is finally knocking this religious freedom bullshit down. NutmegYankee Jun 2016 #20

K&R smirkymonkey Jun 2016 #21

Clarence Thomas is pissed. He planned on trying out the products in front of his staff. underpants Jun 2016 #27

I'm almost giddy wryter2000 Jun 2016 #28

That monumental conundrum had occurred to me, as well. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #30

It's because their agenda is anti-sex wryter2000 Jun 2016 #32

As someone once said, RWers hate to think of anybody enjoying themselves, Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #33

Actually, they want men to enjoy themselves. They want women.... Moonwalk Jun 2016 #34

Basically, women's original sin is being born female... Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #38

Basically, men have to rely on women if they want sons to carry on their empires... Moonwalk Jun 2016 #43

I don't think they are anit-sex. passiveporcupine Jul 2016 #47

Our Wisconsin legislature has been dealing with these crazy alec bill since walker was midnight Jun 2016 #35

Brilliant! "..bill that would require men watch a graphic video about the side effects of Viagra..." Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #39

I'm glad you appreciated a bit of equity…. midnight Jun 2016 #44

Zippity-doo-dah, 3 women on the Court, my oh my what a wonderful start... Hekate Jun 2016 #36

Three and counting...Hillary will appoint at least one or two more. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #40

If a private pharmacy that carried no Federally scheduled compounds claimed this... Socal31 Jun 2016 #37

Like I heard elsewhere: If you don't want to dispense drugs Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #41

Pharmicies don't push drugs, passiveporcupine Jul 2016 #48

Yeah, it's an "ominous sign", alright. It's a sign that the Court won't legitimize bullshit bigotry catbyte Jun 2016 #42

This message was self-deleted by its author shadowandblossom Jul 2016 #49

Thank you riversedge Jul 2016 #51

REC riversedge Jul 2016 #52

Now they need to revisit Greece vs Galloway Danmel Jul 2016 #53

It's about time this "conscience" baloney is stopped in its tracks bucolic_frolic Jul 2016 #54