Latest Breaking News

Night Watchman

(743 posts)

9. Yeah!

Reply to WhiteTara (Reply #3)

Sat Jul 2, 2016, 10:35 AM

Jul 2016

What the hell is going on here??? Shit or get off the pot, FBI!

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

53 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FBI to Interview Hillary Clinton in the Coming Days About Email Scandal, Source Says [View all] CoffeeCat Jul 2016 OP

This is total BS nest Jul 2016 #1

An interview doesn't mean that she did something wrong CoffeeCat Jul 2016 #2

Did you see that the interview happened today? (nt) CoffeeCat Jul 2016 #50

I thought today was the day WhiteTara Jul 2016 #3

Yeah! Night Watchman Jul 2016 #9

The reports were over this weekend. I think people are assuming that it will be today NWCorona Jul 2016 #10

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jul 2016 #4

Same o Same o Cryptoad Jul 2016 #5

Good to see you Coffee Cat yourpaljoey Jul 2016 #6

Stupidest rightwing Republican crap ever! yallerdawg Jul 2016 #7

Actually we can't read them all. A lot have been redacted and some are NWCorona Jul 2016 #11

And some were erased but showed up on her chief of staff's emails awake Jul 2016 #14

Hillary's intent was to have her emails captured on .gov accounts. yallerdawg Jul 2016 #17

Actually it does matter. Hence the affidavit she signed under threat of perjury. NWCorona Jul 2016 #20

Problem is not all of her emails went to .gov karynnj Jul 2016 #47

Her intent was to have them all captured for public record. yallerdawg Jul 2016 #48

What bizarre statement? karynnj Jul 2016 #51

Then you haven't been paying attention. yallerdawg Jul 2016 #52

Oh - come on! yallerdawg Jul 2016 #15

Have you ever held a security clearance and handled classified documents? NWCorona Jul 2016 #19

That's completely false... raindaddy Jul 2016 #24

The FBI has no business reading her personal emails. yallerdawg Jul 2016 #25

You are wrong on this. NWCorona Jul 2016 #29

Hillary Clinton Was Allowed to Delete Personal Emails From Server: Justice Department yallerdawg Jul 2016 #31

Yes she was allowed under the rules but that doesn't change my point NWCorona Jul 2016 #33

Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #34

All speculation and innuendo. yallerdawg Jul 2016 #36

There would't be any speculation if Hillary would've simply followed Dept. policy and used a raindaddy Jul 2016 #41

On and on and on... yallerdawg Jul 2016 #42

I tend to be suspicious of supporters who think their candidate is in infallible and walks on water. raindaddy Jul 2016 #43

And I'm real skeptical of Democrats... yallerdawg Jul 2016 #44

Didn't know Obama's State Dept.& his personally appointed FBI head were RW agencies raindaddy Jul 2016 #45

The Benghazi Committee and Judicial Watch... yallerdawg Jul 2016 #46

Comey has all the dirt on the Clinton Foundation OnyxCollie Jul 2016 #53

I'm sure Hillary wants to get this problem resolved ASAP. nt jalan48 Jul 2016 #8

Getting it over and done with would be best for everyone. bklyncowgirl Jul 2016 #28

First of all, I object to the use of the word "scandal" by the media, mountain grammy Jul 2016 #12

Agreed. "Scandal" is a silly word. I wish the media would drop it. senz Jul 2016 #40

The only question is: what will the NEXT attack be on Hillary stopbush Jul 2016 #13

Unlike most fake news issues this one was self inflicted awake Jul 2016 #16

I have this theory that sometime in the future, we are going to stopbush Jul 2016 #22

interview supposed to be Saturday RussBLib Jul 2016 #18

RW news source.... DonViejo Jul 2016 #26

Every article out about Hillary�s upcoming interview is based upon this RW link as far as I can tell NWCorona Jul 2016 #30

I agree but.... DonViejo Jul 2016 #32

I was for Bernie but this is just ridiculous LiberalLovinLug Jul 2016 #21

part of that problem is the Dems RussBLib Jul 2016 #23

agree 100% LiberalLovinLug Jul 2016 #27

Rec.ing this for the 'before the convention' bit chknltl Jul 2016 #35

Yeah, "according to a source" who works for the Republican National Committee, of course! L. Coyote Jul 2016 #37

This is obviously important news. Thank you for posting it, CoffeeCat. senz Jul 2016 #38

Thank you Senz, CoffeeCat Jul 2016 #49

apparently the meeting is over; lasted over 3 hours RussBLib Jul 2016 #39