Latest Breaking News

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)

50. Did you see that the interview happened today? (nt)

Reply to nest (Reply #1)

Sat Jul 2, 2016, 04:16 PM

Jul 2016

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

53 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FBI to Interview Hillary Clinton in the Coming Days About Email Scandal, Source Says [View all] CoffeeCat Jul 2016 OP

This is total BS nest Jul 2016 #1

An interview doesn't mean that she did something wrong CoffeeCat Jul 2016 #2

Did you see that the interview happened today? (nt) CoffeeCat Jul 2016 #50

I thought today was the day WhiteTara Jul 2016 #3

Yeah! Night Watchman Jul 2016 #9

The reports were over this weekend. I think people are assuming that it will be today NWCorona Jul 2016 #10

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jul 2016 #4

Same o Same o Cryptoad Jul 2016 #5

Good to see you Coffee Cat yourpaljoey Jul 2016 #6

Stupidest rightwing Republican crap ever! yallerdawg Jul 2016 #7

Actually we can't read them all. A lot have been redacted and some are NWCorona Jul 2016 #11

And some were erased but showed up on her chief of staff's emails awake Jul 2016 #14

Hillary's intent was to have her emails captured on .gov accounts. yallerdawg Jul 2016 #17

Actually it does matter. Hence the affidavit she signed under threat of perjury. NWCorona Jul 2016 #20

Problem is not all of her emails went to .gov karynnj Jul 2016 #47

Her intent was to have them all captured for public record. yallerdawg Jul 2016 #48

What bizarre statement? karynnj Jul 2016 #51

Then you haven't been paying attention. yallerdawg Jul 2016 #52

Oh - come on! yallerdawg Jul 2016 #15

Have you ever held a security clearance and handled classified documents? NWCorona Jul 2016 #19

That's completely false... raindaddy Jul 2016 #24

The FBI has no business reading her personal emails. yallerdawg Jul 2016 #25

You are wrong on this. NWCorona Jul 2016 #29

Hillary Clinton Was Allowed to Delete Personal Emails From Server: Justice Department yallerdawg Jul 2016 #31

Yes she was allowed under the rules but that doesn't change my point NWCorona Jul 2016 #33

Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #34

All speculation and innuendo. yallerdawg Jul 2016 #36

There would't be any speculation if Hillary would've simply followed Dept. policy and used a raindaddy Jul 2016 #41

On and on and on... yallerdawg Jul 2016 #42

I tend to be suspicious of supporters who think their candidate is in infallible and walks on water. raindaddy Jul 2016 #43

And I'm real skeptical of Democrats... yallerdawg Jul 2016 #44

Didn't know Obama's State Dept.& his personally appointed FBI head were RW agencies raindaddy Jul 2016 #45

The Benghazi Committee and Judicial Watch... yallerdawg Jul 2016 #46

Comey has all the dirt on the Clinton Foundation OnyxCollie Jul 2016 #53

I'm sure Hillary wants to get this problem resolved ASAP. nt jalan48 Jul 2016 #8

Getting it over and done with would be best for everyone. bklyncowgirl Jul 2016 #28

First of all, I object to the use of the word "scandal" by the media, mountain grammy Jul 2016 #12

Agreed. "Scandal" is a silly word. I wish the media would drop it. senz Jul 2016 #40

The only question is: what will the NEXT attack be on Hillary stopbush Jul 2016 #13

Unlike most fake news issues this one was self inflicted awake Jul 2016 #16

I have this theory that sometime in the future, we are going to stopbush Jul 2016 #22

interview supposed to be Saturday RussBLib Jul 2016 #18

RW news source.... DonViejo Jul 2016 #26

Every article out about Hillary�s upcoming interview is based upon this RW link as far as I can tell NWCorona Jul 2016 #30

I agree but.... DonViejo Jul 2016 #32

I was for Bernie but this is just ridiculous LiberalLovinLug Jul 2016 #21

part of that problem is the Dems RussBLib Jul 2016 #23

agree 100% LiberalLovinLug Jul 2016 #27

Rec.ing this for the 'before the convention' bit chknltl Jul 2016 #35

Yeah, "according to a source" who works for the Republican National Committee, of course! L. Coyote Jul 2016 #37

This is obviously important news. Thank you for posting it, CoffeeCat. senz Jul 2016 #38

Thank you Senz, CoffeeCat Jul 2016 #49

apparently the meeting is over; lasted over 3 hours RussBLib Jul 2016 #39