Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rilgin

(787 posts)
218. You might want to look again what you wrote.
Sun Jul 3, 2016, 05:55 PM
Jul 2016

Last edited Mon Jul 4, 2016, 12:35 AM - Edit history (1)

It is precisely the FBI, Justice Department and other law enforcement agencies to determine if a citizen does something wrong in a criminal sense. Everyone investigated says they did nothing wrong. You seem to want that to be determinate rather than the evidence.

You might try to switch to the other posts which merely try to predict that the FBI will ultimately say she did not do something wrong rather than say She said she didn't do anything wrong and her word is final.

Now where did I put my Happy Dance Shoes? Cryptoad Jul 2016 #1
Yep... Grassy Knoll Jul 2016 #83
I think that's Courtney Cox dancing with The Boss! (n/t) PJMcK Jul 2016 #101
Yes.... Grassy Knoll Jul 2016 #104
That's a cool gif, but ... Tortmaster Jul 2016 #112
. Grassy Knoll Jul 2016 #117
Now that is THE CARLTON!!! MADem Jul 2016 #154
This, but how could someone face charges in a security review? scscholar Jul 2016 #102
Those were the words used by the Clinton campaign. former9thward Jul 2016 #152
It was ALWAYS an investigation. "Security review" doesnt exist. 7962 Jul 2016 #165
Yay! shenmue Jul 2016 #133
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #2
Meaning?????????? leftofcool Jul 2016 #4
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #5
That's a pretty serious charge that you're levelling against AG Lynch lapucelle Jul 2016 #10
The biggest clue, which we've had right in front of our faces all along, is that so many RW pnwmom Jul 2016 #75
Longer than 20 years PJMcK Jul 2016 #92
+1. n/t pnwmom Jul 2016 #96
And, this goes for her haters on the left, too, sadly: Surya Gayatri Jul 2016 #160
Seriously, unrelated! mountain grammy Jul 2016 #15
Please elaborate PJMcK Jul 2016 #11
Cue the conspiracy theories Mz Pip Jul 2016 #12
Suck it Trump! leftofcool Jul 2016 #3
It is simply not the place of the government to determine if she did wrong. AngryAmish Jul 2016 #6
Agreed philosslayer Jul 2016 #52
This, and Nick Merrill confirmed today that it wasn't an investigation (ntxt) scscholar Jul 2016 #129
You might want to look again what you wrote. Rilgin Jul 2016 #218
Who do you think should determine if law and policy were violated? TipTok Jul 2016 #231
I don't understand what this big ado is all about. You've had some 228 replies Cal33 Jul 2016 #234
No biggie!🖨🖨🖨🖨🖨🖨 AngryAmish Jul 2016 #240
so.... chillfactor Jul 2016 #7
Hate to break it to you but the odds are that the nonsense from both the right wing and cstanleytech Jul 2016 #14
They will see this as proof Hillary has the FBI in her pocket and cameras in their cereal boxes. Squinch Jul 2016 #19
I'll just quote Bernie himself... backscatter712 Jul 2016 #119
Of course, you're right to some extent PJMcK Jul 2016 #120
Yes! NastyRiffraff Jul 2016 #190
I'll bet you money that the loons keep harping on this despite this outcome. Squinch Jul 2016 #16
Oh definitely PatSeg Jul 2016 #30
It's a given. They live in a rut. Trump will likely now say this proves how corrupt the RKP5637 Jul 2016 #88
What else do those sorry, pathetic, hate-filled wingnuts have? MADem Jul 2016 #198
I think in the wider world, beyond Democrats, it is backfiring too. It took decades to get here, Squinch Jul 2016 #199
I think you're right in that observation. nt MADem Jul 2016 #207
There will be more coco77 Jul 2016 #202
Bill Maher calls these "zombie lies," because they keep shuffling about even tblue37 Jul 2016 #222
Perfect analogy! Squinch Jul 2016 #223
CNN has been reporting on it like nothing else is going on today. Boomerproud Jul 2016 #8
What took you so long? (wink, n/t) PJMcK Jul 2016 #13
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #192
I wonder if the FBI has to let subjects know whether they're targets lapucelle Jul 2016 #9
Your second paragraph is the key point PJMcK Jul 2016 #17
Funny you should mention the "corporately-owned news organizations" because Wisc Progressive Jul 2016 #25
It is anti-Clinton, and has been for decades. That he signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996 still_one Jul 2016 #35
There is another possibility PJMcK Jul 2016 #39
FBI has stated very clearly all along Cryptoad Jul 2016 #31
Yeah, I'm with you, Cryptoad PJMcK Jul 2016 #45
This is confusing dragonfly301 Jul 2016 #22
Because they might have been investigating if he played any part. Hoyt Jul 2016 #33
Absolutely still_one Jul 2016 #40
Yup, of course that didnt stop some from jumping the gun to the conclusion cstanleytech Jul 2016 #63
Guccifer, a Romanian hacker, hacked into Sidney Blumenthal's AOL account, allegedly. amandabeech Jul 2016 #56
No one should rely on the allegations you repeat here as ANY kind of truth, pnwmom Jul 2016 #91
Suit yourself. n/t amandabeech Jul 2016 #100
Pagliano set up or helped set up Hillary's private e-mail server. amandabeech Jul 2016 #72
Pagliano wasn't granted total immunity creeksneakers2 Jul 2016 #139
Thank you for expressing this better than I did. n/t amandabeech Jul 2016 #180
Because he had a smart lawyer who wanted to make sure that nothing pnwmom Jul 2016 #89
CNN says they have "multiple law enforcement sources." n/t pnwmom Jul 2016 #86
CNN had no one but MFM008 Jul 2016 #156
If they're so dominated by R's, why would they falsely claim pnwmom Jul 2016 #159
I'm just saying what I saw MFM008 Jul 2016 #171
Why does the fact that they interviewed many R's tell you pnwmom Jul 2016 #172
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jul 2016 #18
Right on! (n/t) PJMcK Jul 2016 #46
I'm not seeing this story at any other links yet bucolic_frolic Jul 2016 #20
From CNN: yallerdawg Jul 2016 #21
I tuned in to that "other" network for a minute RussBLib Jul 2016 #23
I looked up at the TV at the gym and they had some "13 Hours of Horror in BENGHAZI" playing.... winstars Jul 2016 #98
I know it doesn't matter mercuryblues Jul 2016 #99
But now hasn't Bill Clinton put another damn conspiracy right in their hands doc03 Jul 2016 #24
They would just have found something else and or made up one. nt cstanleytech Jul 2016 #26
Bill Clinton is supposed to be a political genius why would he doc03 Jul 2016 #34
You could ask the same question over why he would risk his office to get a blowjob and cstanleytech Jul 2016 #42
Could be that the "connection" between bumping into Lynch in Phoenix and this long long... George II Jul 2016 #85
That sounds entirely possible. BlueMTexpat Jul 2016 #161
He's old and he enjoys the game of politics a lot. Chemisse Jul 2016 #111
I actually think the opposite. liberalmuse Jul 2016 #122
Bingo. Heaven forfend if the Clintons fail to put up enough flags stopbush Jul 2016 #38
We don't need to make things up Politicalboi Jul 2016 #194
My comment would not apply to you Politicalboi unless of course you are one of the cstanleytech Jul 2016 #196
It was not a "meeting" - it was a chance encounter due to delay at the airport. MADem Jul 2016 #66
He could have just called her on the phone if he wanted to do something doc03 Jul 2016 #107
Well, since the FBI said there's nothing to Clinton's emails, Loretta Lynch doesn't even have to MADem Jul 2016 #153
Has the FBI actually said there's nothing wrong? Why not release the 22 emails they're holding? floriduck Jul 2016 #191
Someone inside the investigation has given the wave-off to CNN and the NBC franchises. MADem Jul 2016 #195
Thanks for the reply. The sooner the decision is announced, the better for all. floriduck Jul 2016 #203
re: "The target, though, all along, has been the hacker. " thesquanderer Jul 2016 #233
You'll have to ask them. MADem Jul 2016 #246
re "Taking a deal means the guilty party spills the beans" thesquanderer Jul 2016 #248
Every plea deal I've seen involves bean - spilling. MADem Jul 2016 #249
Many crimes involve no beans to spill. That doesn't mean they don't get plea deals. thesquanderer Jul 2016 #251
Well, my mind isn't changed on this matter. MADem Jul 2016 #259
Even from your perspective, i.e. assuming that Guccifer must be spilling beans, thesquanderer Jul 2016 #260
Here's the answer: thesquanderer Jul 2016 #262
If true, I hope all those who "indicted" Clinton months ago apologize. Hoyt Jul 2016 #27
I wouldnt hold your breath waiting for that to happen. nt cstanleytech Jul 2016 #32
I am not a Smurf still_one Jul 2016 #44
Don't hold your breathe, Hoyt PJMcK Jul 2016 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author Hoyt Jul 2016 #64
The cult of the Indictment Fairy self-deported themselves geek tragedy Jul 2016 #59
I know of some who its going to crush though because they were holding out hope cstanleytech Jul 2016 #67
Good. I hope those rooting for Clinton to be indicted geek tragedy Jul 2016 #76
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jul 2016 #108
Sadly, that's true PJMcK Jul 2016 #79
And if their wish came true, all her delegates would go to Joe Biden. pnwmom Jul 2016 #82
HA Goodman is still claiming on Twitter today that Clinton will be indicted. lapucelle Jul 2016 #206
From MSNBC phone interview: yallerdawg Jul 2016 #28
"NBC News/WSJ poll shows ... modestybl Jul 2016 #113
True, tRump just says what he thinks no matter how vile or ignorant or unaware of himself uponit7771 Jul 2016 #150
Well well well Hekate Jul 2016 #29
"The FBI had already publicly told the New York times that she was not even a target Iliyah Jul 2016 #36
What's the right going to do now that they don't have christx30 Jul 2016 #37
What she was doing in the grassy knoll still_one Jul 2016 #49
I Object... Grassy Knoll Jul 2016 #58
objection sustained. You win still_one Jul 2016 #62
Wrong. She's the fiend who faked the moon landing. calimary Jul 2016 #84
you mean we didn't land on the moon? still_one Jul 2016 #90
The Right is so sad PJMcK Jul 2016 #50
That's quite a trifecta they've got going there, PJMcK! calimary Jul 2016 #131
We stand together, calimary. PJMcK Jul 2016 #136
Speaking of HAHA charlyvi Jul 2016 #197
I knew that months ago. Everybody knew that months ago. onehandle Jul 2016 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jul 2016 #93
Except those that watch the news bhikkhu Jul 2016 #106
That was pretty much accepted by most objective people months ago. Just like the Benghazi fiasco. George II Jul 2016 #43
Now that his last way forward appears over, will Sanders do the right thing? Hoyt Jul 2016 #47
You think? n/t doc03 Jul 2016 #53
Such as? Matt_R Jul 2016 #219
No mention of this on CNN.com,MSNBC.com or Fox News .com only says she was doc03 Jul 2016 #51
David Brook Geronimoe Jul 2016 #54
Why because you don't like the OP? still_one Jul 2016 #57
No because no relable sources Geronimoe Jul 2016 #65
No, this is a RW lie. The WH never said that. n/t pnwmom Jul 2016 #69
Yes they did Geronimoe Jul 2016 #70
Post the link to anyone at the WH saying this. leftofcool Jul 2016 #74
No, you didn't. You can't provide a link because it never happened. n/t pnwmom Jul 2016 #77
I wouldnt be willing to wager on that. cstanleytech Jul 2016 #73
No one can prove a negative. But if it was said the poster should be able pnwmom Jul 2016 #80
No, the WH did not say that and the FBI has said numerous times HRC was not the target. leftofcool Jul 2016 #71
Hillary is not going to be indicted. geek tragedy Jul 2016 #81
if u had read the OP it provided a link Cryptoad Jul 2016 #109
You having a sad? nt geek tragedy Jul 2016 #61
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jul 2016 #94
Not propaganda! KalicoKitty Jul 2016 #141
For sure arikara Jul 2016 #146
The only people who thought otherwise were Trumpbots, Paulbots and right wing conspiracy theorists, MADem Jul 2016 #55
There were (or are) still DUers awaiting the Indictment Fairy. Maybe they will simmer down NOW? Hekate Jul 2016 #97
They're not living up to their agreement if that is the case. MADem Jul 2016 #155
Surprise surprise DrDan Jul 2016 #60
Hi itsrobert Jul 2016 #68
. Jester Messiah Jul 2016 #78
Daily News Bin Geronimoe Jul 2016 #87
That is not true. Did you even go to the link? still_one Jul 2016 #95
A unregistered GoDady promoting Hillary Geronimoe Jul 2016 #116
LOL,..... Grassy Knoll Jul 2016 #126
no educated person could read that story NJCher Jul 2016 #134
*Ahem* NutmegYankee Jul 2016 #103
I found this from a previous post. floriduck Jul 2016 #193
Oh, OK.... Grassy Knoll Jul 2016 #105
No, it isn't. You're confusing it with another site. At any rate the source is NBC. CNN has it, MADem Jul 2016 #157
Well, thank goodness sangfroid Jul 2016 #110
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #114
You do realize the FBI doesn't indict don't you? As far as your implied conspirisy still_one Jul 2016 #123
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #179
You're still wrong. okasha Jul 2016 #204
Well, this is a relief. PatrickforO Jul 2016 #115
Alleluia! lovuian Jul 2016 #118
It is going to be sad for some I am sure when the republicans lose the Senate still_one Jul 2016 #125
I can't wait for the day the Republicans lovuian Jul 2016 #210
The key issue has been intent from day one and FBI found no evidence of intent Gothmog Jul 2016 #121
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #124
Gee, you are going to be disappointed when the FBI officially doesn't find any criminal still_one Jul 2016 #127
"Funny that faux news is spewing the same garbage..." Surya Gayatri Jul 2016 #162
It sure seems that way still_one Jul 2016 #178
BWAAAAAAAAHAAAAA!!!111!! Grassy Knoll Jul 2016 #132
Another Republican attack on the Clinton’s amounts to nothing liberal N proud Jul 2016 #128
Yes! KingFlorez Jul 2016 #130
There is no such conclusion on MSNBC. This is fiction not LBN. KeepItReal Jul 2016 #135
I checked CNN's site, MSNBC's site, even Politico: Couldn't Find It Night Watchman Jul 2016 #137
Not quite creeksneakers2 Jul 2016 #142
The MSNBC was based on a Chuck Todd interview, and CNN was a tweet from a still_one Jul 2016 #143
"sources tell CNN the expectation is Clinton will not face charges." KeepItReal Jul 2016 #144
exactly - sounds like hearsay transatlantica Jul 2016 #158
Yeah, not LBN. Todd's statement may be LBN, the rest is opinion/commentary/interpretation thesquanderer Jul 2016 #221
Agreed Night Watchman Jul 2016 #225
WOO HOO!!! YESSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! lunamagica Jul 2016 #138
Been saying that for months elmac Jul 2016 #140
Mahalo, Cryptotoad~ Cha Jul 2016 #145
The sooner we can put this totally behind her the better... jimlup Jul 2016 #147
"This information was obvious enough all along to anyone who followed the story accurately....." Tarheel_Dem Jul 2016 #148
This article is based upon rumor and misstatements.. k8conant Jul 2016 #149
Many broken hearts over this. JNelson6563 Jul 2016 #151
I hope that this means that any more BlueMTexpat Jul 2016 #163
"Clinton replied by saying that he had no knowledge of such matters " patricia92243 Jul 2016 #164
For everyone living in the real world this was very obvious the outcome. youceyec Jul 2016 #166
K&R! stonecutter357 Jul 2016 #167
Think about it Jarqui Jul 2016 #168
No, the Fox News fantasies of an indictment were never accurate. geek tragedy Jul 2016 #174
Back up your claim Jarqui Jul 2016 #186
Lol, please promise to post your take when the announcement is made geek tragedy Jul 2016 #188
Thought so. All air - absolutely nothing behind it.nt Jarqui Jul 2016 #229
No, it's just that we've had to make the argument so much geek tragedy Jul 2016 #230
Were you a part of the FBI investigating and/or writing up the report? Jarqui Jul 2016 #232
LMAO. People who pimp the Fox News talking points geek tragedy Jul 2016 #235
BS Jarqui Jul 2016 #245
. geek tragedy Jul 2016 #247
It is against the criminal law to have classified material on your home computer Jarqui Jul 2016 #250
All of the amateur, know-nothing Internet prosecutors geek tragedy Jul 2016 #252
I don't follow Drudge or care what they have to say. Trump's weighing in on it: Jarqui Jul 2016 #253
Do you promise to comment once the decision is announced? nt geek tragedy Jul 2016 #254
Absolutely. I'm not the one saying "she's going to be indicted" or Jarqui Jul 2016 #258
. geek tragedy Jul 2016 #261
The people who set up and service her computer, amandabeech Jul 2016 #255
Of course she WONT be indicted. Doesnt mean she did nothing wrong. 7962 Jul 2016 #213
She displayed poor judgment, which is not a crime. geek tragedy Jul 2016 #217
"Poor judgement" regarding security will likely cost you your job 7962 Jul 2016 #224
K&R! stonecutter357 Jul 2016 #169
CNN? MSNBC? SmittynMo Jul 2016 #170
It's on the front page on CNN and MSNBC XemaSab Jul 2016 #173
There must be a solid source for this. I cant really see everybody starting to celebrate if there Jemmons Jul 2016 #220
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #175
I see no other major media running with this, until I do, I will wait to hear Comey himself AntiBank Jul 2016 #176
LOL Evergreen Emerald Jul 2016 #182
glad to be of assistance AntiBank Jul 2016 #187
Hillary fasttense Jul 2016 #177
Another Nonsensegate CanonRay Jul 2016 #181
BENGHAZI!!!!11111 jpak Jul 2016 #183
Drink! Cryptoad Jul 2016 #189
Well of course not ismnotwasm Jul 2016 #184
nothing to see here citizen.... getagrip_already Jul 2016 #185
Good news! MynameisBlarney Jul 2016 #200
Bill will continue to be a problem.. coco77 Jul 2016 #201
He's not been a problem with me. upaloopa Jul 2016 #205
Maybe not for you.. coco77 Jul 2016 #208
I doubt it, hes kept mostly out of it since he left office and I have not seen anything cstanleytech Jul 2016 #211
They will bait him coco77 Jul 2016 #214
They can try but he generally has given them the middle finger on taking it in the past. nt cstanleytech Jul 2016 #215
I remember there was a case a few months ago when he barged into a Cal33 Jul 2016 #242
Yeah, he had a megaphone. amandabeech Jul 2016 #256
He's not a problem with me, either. lunamagica Jul 2016 #212
Stupid silly Repug idiots! Typical wolfie001 Jul 2016 #209
Many Dems have not bought into it coco77 Jul 2016 #216
I share the View of Many Posters Above Night Watchman Jul 2016 #226
CNN reported that they have sources.. DCBob Jul 2016 #239
Say Bye-Bye, Indictment Fairy! Vogon_Glory Jul 2016 #227
Todd's statement is not what the OP said it was. thesquanderer Jul 2016 #228
I think this was the main source.. which seems legit to me. DCBob Jul 2016 #238
And who are those sources? Are they from DOJ? FBI? Or from Hillary's campaign itself? thesquanderer Jul 2016 #241
"sources familiar with the investigation told CNN" DCBob Jul 2016 #244
re: "Hillary’s otherwise steady and controversy free campaign." This is a serious news source? thesquanderer Jul 2016 #236
Please read my reply #234 (about 1/4 of the way down from the top of this Cal33 Jul 2016 #237
Up next humbled_opinion Jul 2016 #243
Will they focus their resources on Jane Sanders now? tallahasseedem Jul 2016 #257
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»CNN and MSNBC confirm Hil...»Reply #218