Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hack89

(39,181 posts)
105. More like art, especially here. nt
Wed Jul 13, 2016, 05:53 PM
Jul 2016

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good job to the citizen. Statistical Jul 2016 #1
Prisons are full of stupid people. nt hack89 Jul 2016 #4
Graveyards even fuller with stupid people. The shooter risked death & is likely going to prison. .nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #120
Hard to imagine him being charged. hack89 Jul 2016 #123
Easy to imagine him being charged. You keep acting like a law expert but you don't post Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #130
It's Texas, 406-Boz Jul 2016 #147
THIS. n/t uawchild Jul 2016 #149
It's Texas. The chances of him getting charged are roughly zero. TwilightZone Jul 2016 #157
probably didn't happen quite like the guy claimed, but makes good propaganda for open carry olddad56 Jul 2016 #77
Nothing indicates that the civilian was open carrying. Statistical Jul 2016 #81
Oh goody! More guns for everyone! AllyCat Jul 2016 #2
A nice ending for a change yeoman6987 Jul 2016 #23
And the gun nuts will point to it and say camelfan Jul 2016 #163
Well, that's one (nt) LuckyTheDog Jul 2016 #3
I agree, ... aggiesal Jul 2016 #29
Wonder if it's the same guy who was chased off by a 70 year old veteran csziggy Jul 2016 #5
NOT a cool-headed response. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #6
Thank you. That's the correct response. FailureToCommunicate Jul 2016 #9
My thought exactly lapfog_1 Jul 2016 #10
Thread Winner! COLGATE4 Jul 2016 #11
100% agreement. n/t SpankMe Jul 2016 #14
Excellent, common sense response to this attempt guillaumeb Jul 2016 #56
Now he is liable for shooting the guy, just imagine if the customers wife had shown up right then? Rex Jul 2016 #65
I agree rockfordfile Jul 2016 #76
Exactly. What's wrong with moonscape Jul 2016 #160
Oh great, are we now going back to the "Wild Wild West"? George II Jul 2016 #7
Hollywood's version any way.... ManiacJoe Jul 2016 #31
"Man who terrorizes and robs several with easily available AK-47 is luckily shot... villager Jul 2016 #8
Is "Cool headed response" a joke? nt greyl Jul 2016 #12
Or a lure. Can't decide which is a more apt description. nt hack89 Jul 2016 #13
Is lure describing your OP comment, or the shooter's tactic? nt greyl Jul 2016 #71
The OP. They love all this negative attention. Rex Jul 2016 #72
The comment hack89 Jul 2016 #100
Catch 22... sarisataka Jul 2016 #15
Indeed. If he were an off-duty cop Blandocyte Jul 2016 #20
That guy must really love waffle fries. Arkana Jul 2016 #16
They are to die for! nt hack89 Jul 2016 #17
Cool headed response? TheCowsCameHome Jul 2016 #18
ok. nt hack89 Jul 2016 #19
I think cool headed is avoiding conflict. The shooter sought a conflict. Still a good shoot, Skeeter Barnes Jul 2016 #21
Lulz of course you like this article. Rex Jul 2016 #22
I am enjoying the responses even more. hack89 Jul 2016 #25
Right this is what you wanted... Rex Jul 2016 #27
Your personal disapproval is not really too upsetting hack89 Jul 2016 #30
Yes your one and only issue is guns, we all know. Rex Jul 2016 #32
He won't be charged and you know it hack89 Jul 2016 #36
Wrong he was no longer in danger, I understand if you cannot comprehend what I am saying to you. Rex Jul 2016 #39
You can legally follow and confront criminals. hack89 Jul 2016 #45
So says the guy that shot him. Rex Jul 2016 #49
Not everyone believes violent criminals hack89 Jul 2016 #55
LOL Rex Jul 2016 #57
Lets bookmark this thread and see what happens. nt hack89 Jul 2016 #60
Yes let us do that. nt Rex Jul 2016 #62
The violent criminal is the one who fires the shots causing injury and near-death. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #91
No. Pointing an AK-47 at someone is definitely a criminal act hack89 Jul 2016 #103
Yeah, the AK-47 guy is criminal. The idjit who provoked the gunfight & shot is a violent criminal.nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #114
That poor guy with the AK-47! Everyone is picking on him. nt hack89 Jul 2016 #121
Repetition of your silly line in this thread doesn't make it stronger. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #155
Some do not see the forest for the trees. Rex Jul 2016 #107
Do you believe criminals sarisataka Jul 2016 #118
Yeah he stole some money and ran out of the building, then the customer shot him. Mistake #1. Rex Jul 2016 #129
I am seeing what is the baseline sarisataka Jul 2016 #137
People get sued all the time by their attackers. Rex Jul 2016 #140
Not at all sarisataka Jul 2016 #142
I agree with most of what you just said. Rex Jul 2016 #146
is synchronised knee jerking an Olympic sport? AntiBank Jul 2016 #94
More like art, especially here. nt hack89 Jul 2016 #105
I would think the customer could be charged for stalking Cooper ... Auggie Jul 2016 #24
Not if he thought his wife was in danger. hack89 Jul 2016 #26
He can think whatever he wants. He did not have to call to the guy. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #92
I live near Desoto. He'll be charged if the mood strikes the police/prosecutor. Ash_F Jul 2016 #93
Best reply yet imo. Rex Jul 2016 #111
I don't believe for a millisecond he is going to be charged in TX. LisaL Jul 2016 #144
Yep, he shot first so now he can face charges for attempted murder. Rex Jul 2016 #28
He won't be charged. hack89 Jul 2016 #33
Wrong he was in no danger and the perp already left the store, you really don't Rex Jul 2016 #35
Except following someone is not illegal hack89 Jul 2016 #40
He said she said. Rex Jul 2016 #43
In the real world outside of DU, armed robbers don't get the benefit of the doubt. hack89 Jul 2016 #50
Wrong, the court will decide who is at fault. Rex Jul 2016 #53
It won't even get before a grand jury. hack89 Jul 2016 #58
LOL. Keep dreaming. Rex Jul 2016 #61
You disagreeing with me deflates my sails? hack89 Jul 2016 #66
You sure do. Why do you invest such emotion in this forum? Rex Jul 2016 #68
He pursued an armed person fleeing a robbery after any personal threat had passed. bluedigger Jul 2016 #59
Show me the letter of the law. hack89 Jul 2016 #63
Shhhh...they are on their Batman high! Rex Jul 2016 #64
texas law on self defense melm00se Jul 2016 #124
How is being the aggressor in this situation self defense? Rex Jul 2016 #135
In TX, he has a right to use deadly force to defend property. LisaL Jul 2016 #127
Anybody's property, or his own. Plus, you can carry a confederate flag by law, but should you. Hoyt Jul 2016 #152
Following is not illegal. He could have left it at that. Provoking a violent gunfight is illegal. nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #95
Even if there are no criminal charges, the shooter left himself liable for civil charges. procon Jul 2016 #86
Self defense does not require you ManiacJoe Jul 2016 #34
The customer was no longer in danger and followed the perp outside and shot him. Rex Jul 2016 #37
The customer claims he feared for his arriving wife. Statistical Jul 2016 #42
He said she said. Rex Jul 2016 #46
He is only liable in your mind. Statistical Jul 2016 #52
Yeah we shall see. Rex Jul 2016 #54
Isn't a cop just an indirect deployment of a firearm. Statistical Jul 2016 #38
Again he was no longer in danger and escalated the situation. Rex Jul 2016 #41
Well your right conceal carry permit holders are far less likely to shoot an unarmed person. Statistical Jul 2016 #44
Provoking the guy was what will land him in hot water. Rex Jul 2016 #47
Maybe you missed the fact that this happened in TX. LisaL Jul 2016 #99
I live in Texas and maybe he will be and maybe not. Rex Jul 2016 #101
Cops have a MANDATE to follow & confront criminals. Wanna-be 'heroes' do NOT. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #96
He didn't need a mandate. LisaL Jul 2016 #119
Yes, only in the sense that nobody needs a mandate to commit a crime and shoot somebody. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #125
It was not illegal to follow and confront the robber. hack89 Jul 2016 #67
Show us the law that agrees with your assessment, you won't be able to find it. Rex Jul 2016 #70
Good grief ... can you believe the responses here? Auggie Jul 2016 #82
We do have a lot of wannabe cowboys here in Texas, they dream of being the hero Rex Jul 2016 #84
At least immoral, but gunners don't care about that. Hoyt Jul 2016 #154
I knew it was Texas. liberalmuse Jul 2016 #48
It is pretty crazy here, our governor is the worlds biggest fuck up and loves guns!! Rex Jul 2016 #51
Tragic Angel Martin Jul 2016 #69
Yes, Violent vigilantes provoking gunfights are more than just "too bad". They are really stupid. nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #97
Idiots with guns! procon Jul 2016 #73
After the Dallas shootings last week TeddyR Jul 2016 #74
See post #15 sarisataka Jul 2016 #79
So the customer shot a man fleeing the restaurant, every cowboy's dream. George Zimmerman Hoyt Jul 2016 #75
He wasn't fleeing when he was shot. He was pointing a rifle (a scary black rifle at that) Statistical Jul 2016 #80
That's what the cowboy said, as he was obviously trained. George Zimmerman did the same, Hoyt Jul 2016 #151
Urban cowboys and their guns. Rex Jul 2016 #85
Alternatively matt819 Jul 2016 #78
^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^. NT angrychair Jul 2016 #87
That was my first thought, "so why not call the wife and tell her to stay away." Rex Jul 2016 #88
Maybe he didn't have a cell phone. LisaL Jul 2016 #104
Right, he has a firearm but not a cell phone. Rex Jul 2016 #109
That's immaterial Auggie Jul 2016 #115
+1 Auggie Jul 2016 #89
After the robbery was over he pulled a gun, called to the robber, and executed him. Bet his dick was CBGLuthier Jul 2016 #83
How hard sarisataka Jul 2016 #90
In TX, he is allowed to use deadly force to defend property. LisaL Jul 2016 #102
He wasn't defending anything, the perp had already left the building. Rex Jul 2016 #108
You must have missed the part of the article that says perp robbed several customers. LisaL Jul 2016 #116
Right and they were no longer in any danger, sadly the customer had to walk outside Rex Jul 2016 #122
Liable for what? LisaL Jul 2016 #128
Shooting someone, do you think you just can run around and shoot someone when you feel like it? Rex Jul 2016 #131
Did he run around and shot someone when he felt like it? LisaL Jul 2016 #133
Uh yes he did...he walked outside and shot the guy that robbed the place. Are you taking about Rex Jul 2016 #134
Shooting the guy who robbed the place isn't the same as running around shooting people because he LisaL Jul 2016 #143
But he did feel like it, he made a choice to escalate the situation into a gun fight. The customer. Rex Jul 2016 #148
... Crepuscular Jul 2016 #161
He had left the restaurant treestar Jul 2016 #98
Yet. But if you can't trust an AK-47 wielding criminal, who can you trust? nt hack89 Jul 2016 #110
We are supposed to trust the guy who provoked a gunfight and shot someone near to death? No. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2016 #141
Guns make people stupid. Rex Jul 2016 #117
... Crepuscular Jul 2016 #162
Wouldn't it be ironic if the customer faced charges? TheCowsCameHome Jul 2016 #106
That poor innocent guy with the AK-47. Everyone is picking on him! nt hack89 Jul 2016 #112
Just another loser that thinks AK's are fun toys. TheCowsCameHome Jul 2016 #136
I agree sounds like a total loser. Rex Jul 2016 #138
In TX, this customer will face charges when pigs fly. LisaL Jul 2016 #113
Agreed. As I noted in another response, the concept of self-defense (and defense of property) is... TwilightZone Jul 2016 #158
Do any reporters know how to write logically? tblue37 Jul 2016 #126
Somebody on life support could recover. LisaL Jul 2016 #132
Yes, I know. My brother did. But the language is jarring coming as it tblue37 Jul 2016 #139
That will be one robber. Scattered, smothered, and covered. n/t jtuck004 Jul 2016 #145
Sounds like he "bushwhacked" him in the parking lot. Cryptoad Jul 2016 #150
because you like robbing Wafflehouses? Statistical Jul 2016 #153
Oh, Gawd Night Watchman Jul 2016 #156
Sounds like a perfect response to having a ak-47 pointed at you. GOLGO 13 Jul 2016 #159
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Man who tried to rob Waff...»Reply #105