Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Man who tried to rob Waffle House with an AK-47 is shot by customer [View all]hack89
(39,181 posts)105. More like art, especially here. nt
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
163 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Graveyards even fuller with stupid people. The shooter risked death & is likely going to prison. .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2016
#120
Easy to imagine him being charged. You keep acting like a law expert but you don't post
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2016
#130
probably didn't happen quite like the guy claimed, but makes good propaganda for open carry
olddad56
Jul 2016
#77
Now he is liable for shooting the guy, just imagine if the customers wife had shown up right then?
Rex
Jul 2016
#65
"Man who terrorizes and robs several with easily available AK-47 is luckily shot...
villager
Jul 2016
#8
I think cool headed is avoiding conflict. The shooter sought a conflict. Still a good shoot,
Skeeter Barnes
Jul 2016
#21
Wrong he was no longer in danger, I understand if you cannot comprehend what I am saying to you.
Rex
Jul 2016
#39
The violent criminal is the one who fires the shots causing injury and near-death.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2016
#91
Yeah, the AK-47 guy is criminal. The idjit who provoked the gunfight & shot is a violent criminal.nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2016
#114
Repetition of your silly line in this thread doesn't make it stronger. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2016
#155
Yeah he stole some money and ran out of the building, then the customer shot him. Mistake #1.
Rex
Jul 2016
#129
In the real world outside of DU, armed robbers don't get the benefit of the doubt.
hack89
Jul 2016
#50
He pursued an armed person fleeing a robbery after any personal threat had passed.
bluedigger
Jul 2016
#59
Anybody's property, or his own. Plus, you can carry a confederate flag by law, but should you.
Hoyt
Jul 2016
#152
Following is not illegal. He could have left it at that. Provoking a violent gunfight is illegal. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2016
#95
Even if there are no criminal charges, the shooter left himself liable for civil charges.
procon
Jul 2016
#86
Well your right conceal carry permit holders are far less likely to shoot an unarmed person.
Statistical
Jul 2016
#44
Cops have a MANDATE to follow & confront criminals. Wanna-be 'heroes' do NOT. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2016
#96
Yes, only in the sense that nobody needs a mandate to commit a crime and shoot somebody.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2016
#125
It is pretty crazy here, our governor is the worlds biggest fuck up and loves guns!!
Rex
Jul 2016
#51
Yes, Violent vigilantes provoking gunfights are more than just "too bad". They are really stupid. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2016
#97
So the customer shot a man fleeing the restaurant, every cowboy's dream. George Zimmerman
Hoyt
Jul 2016
#75
He wasn't fleeing when he was shot. He was pointing a rifle (a scary black rifle at that)
Statistical
Jul 2016
#80
That's what the cowboy said, as he was obviously trained. George Zimmerman did the same,
Hoyt
Jul 2016
#151
After the robbery was over he pulled a gun, called to the robber, and executed him. Bet his dick was
CBGLuthier
Jul 2016
#83
You must have missed the part of the article that says perp robbed several customers.
LisaL
Jul 2016
#116
Right and they were no longer in any danger, sadly the customer had to walk outside
Rex
Jul 2016
#122
Shooting someone, do you think you just can run around and shoot someone when you feel like it?
Rex
Jul 2016
#131
Uh yes he did...he walked outside and shot the guy that robbed the place. Are you taking about
Rex
Jul 2016
#134
Shooting the guy who robbed the place isn't the same as running around shooting people because he
LisaL
Jul 2016
#143
But he did feel like it, he made a choice to escalate the situation into a gun fight. The customer.
Rex
Jul 2016
#148
We are supposed to trust the guy who provoked a gunfight and shot someone near to death? No. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2016
#141
Agreed. As I noted in another response, the concept of self-defense (and defense of property) is...
TwilightZone
Jul 2016
#158