Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

chillfactor

(7,694 posts)

11. same here...

Reply to forest444 (Reply #1)

Fri Jul 15, 2016, 03:07 PM

Jul 2016

if we have any chance of regaining control of the senate, we need every senate seat we already have...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Warren-Clinton meeting today [View all] mblock Jul 2016 OP

As exhilarating as a Clinton-Warren ticket would be, forest444 Jul 2016 #1

Agreed. n/t progressoid Jul 2016 #7

+1 n/t jaysunb Jul 2016 #10

same here... chillfactor Jul 2016 #11

Hers would likely be lost only a very short time. karynnj Jul 2016 #19

This can't be stated enough Saviolo Jul 2016 #15

Hear, hear. forest444 Jul 2016 #27

Um, frankly..."Bitchy" nt msanthrope Jul 2016 #16

Yup. She just doesn't bring enough to the table. Too risky. No new geography. Not ready for Prez. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #17

I beg to differ. forest444 Jul 2016 #24

I honestly dont believe she will pick Warren but rather I think this meeting might be cstanleytech Jul 2016 #21

And/or to be courteous to tell Warren to her face spooky3 Jul 2016 #28

+1 geardaddy Jul 2016 #25

Not me, I would just be elated WatchWhatISay Jul 2016 #37

I'd feel the same way. forest444 Jul 2016 #40

Yes, this. N/t Beartracks Jul 2016 #38

Thanks! forest444 Jul 2016 #39

Really????????? Like really?????? Happyhippychick Jul 2016 #2

Fingers crossed Hillary make a better VP pick... FailureToCommunicate Jul 2016 #3

Progressives have given Democratic Leaders bucolic_frolic Jul 2016 #4

"Secret meeting" Apparently not. yellowcanine Jul 2016 #5

Thank you! mblock Jul 2016 #6

Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeease Maven Jul 2016 #8

She's not picking Warren folks underpants Jul 2016 #9

Right on. I love her too, but she is better in other capacities. NOT a good VP choice. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #18

Why wouldn't it make sense? Cali_Democrat Jul 2016 #26

We'd lose a Democratic seat in the Senate, for one... tinrobot Jul 2016 #29

It's nice to dream! mblock Jul 2016 #12

Sorry, but this isn't a school playground where we pick the "funnest" VP. This isn't a teenage game. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #20

Professional courtesy. RandySF Jul 2016 #13

yep took the words right our of my mouth! Backwoodsrider Jul 2016 #33

it's a secret... getagrip_already Jul 2016 #14

No one said anything about funniest mblock Jul 2016 #22

Word is... She met with Castro as well. mblock Jul 2016 #23

I've changed my mind from "Not Warren" to "Yes Warren." NBachers Jul 2016 #30

"It's not you, it's me" left-of-center2012 Jul 2016 #31

likely professional courtesy meeting Backwoodsrider Jul 2016 #32

I'm crossing my fingers that she won't be picked. BlueStater Jul 2016 #34

Others were there today as well mblock Jul 2016 #35

2 women on ticket is bad for Reagan Dems. nt ErikJ Jul 2016 #36

I think she would make a great cabinet member or head of the NLRB. nt King_Klonopin Jul 2016 #41

So, uhh, super-secret meeting, right? Super double secret meeting? truthisfreedom Jul 2016 #42