Latest Breaking News

former9thward

(33,424 posts)

36. Assange received leaked info from Manning (presumably).

Mon Jun 25, 2012, 06:01 PM

Jun 2012

Assange knew that Manning had no right to give him the leaked info. Novak was interviewing the number 2 official in the State Department. He asked an off hand question about the trip to Africa and Armitage gave up Plame in an off hand remark. Novak would not have known he was not supposed to use that info. About half of CIA employees are analysts and they are not covert. Novak would have no way of knowing Plame was covert at the time.

So legally two different cases. Whether the U.S. wants to extradite Assange who knows?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Assange wants guarantees he will not be sent to the US [View all] struggle4progress Jun 2012 OP

Sweden 'can't offer Assange guarantees' struggle4progress Jun 2012 #1

Why does he suppose he is in a position to make demands? treestar Jun 2012 #2

Why shouldn't he try? KansDem Jun 2012 #4

Show trial? In Sweden? treestar Jun 2012 #7

This was about the US intervening to extradite him to the US KansDem Jun 2012 #10

What guarantee that the UK won't? treestar Jun 2012 #17

Bullshit. The US isn't trying to extradite him and never has. TheWraith Jun 2012 #27

It's another one of those things that is hard to understand. JDPriestly Jun 2012 #15

that is really not very nice treestar Jun 2012 #19

And sometimes people who know a lot but want to distract JDPriestly Jun 2012 #29

Here's some knowledge then treestar Jun 2012 #33

What is the obvious answer to your question is, is to ask why this is? And there will be the answer. clang1 Jun 2012 #23

Novak was not pursued because he was the reporter not the leaker. former9thward Jun 2012 #30

Didn't Assange received leaked information... KansDem Jun 2012 #32

Assange received leaked info from Manning (presumably). former9thward Jun 2012 #36

Excuse me????? ljm2002 Jun 2012 #41

Both Novak and Assange can not be prosecuted in the US jeff47 Jun 2012 #34

a clown? really? Voice for Peace Jun 2012 #5

Claiming asylum in a third world nation from three first world nations treestar Jun 2012 #6

Thanks for bringing that last part up. It's seldom discussed except as 'national security' and... freshwest Jun 2012 #9

typical, baseless smear reorg Jun 2012 #25

Pffft Because he can and he must that's why. clang1 Jun 2012 #11

Do you really believe all that about the US? treestar Jun 2012 #20

Post removed Post removed Jun 2012 #22

I am going to say this because it needs to be said, otherwise I would not clang1 Jun 2012 #26

treestar -- Because there may be a country that is willing to offer him asylum JDPriestly Jun 2012 #12

re: national insanity clang1 Jun 2012 #16

I described the split in our national personality. JDPriestly Jun 2012 #18

Because you still do not understand. Maybe you do. There is insanity, but it is not clang1 Jun 2012 #21

The US is not seeking extradition of Assange. jeff47 Jun 2012 #35

Maybe you missed the fact that they convened a grand jury to bring charges? go west young man Jun 2012 #38

Again, waiting for Sweden makes no sense jeff47 Jun 2012 #40

I saw Crosby Stills and Nash warrprayer Jun 2012 #3

If our government sulphurdunn Jun 2012 #8

Probably would use drugs on him etc. clang1 Jun 2012 #13

Meanwhile, of course, we must do absolutely nothing to defend ourselves JDPriestly Jun 2012 #14

Yep. The US has become one of 'those' countries laundry_queen Jun 2012 #24

You're aware that the practice of torture has been ended in the US and US custody, yes? TheWraith Jun 2012 #28

Forgive me if I remain skeptical. sulphurdunn Jun 2012 #31

Well put. go west young man Jun 2012 #39

If the U.S. Wants Assange & Sweden Has Him, he'll Be Renditioned to the U.S. solarman350 Jun 2012 #37