Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

clang1

(884 posts)
52. Even the russians are not 'embarrased' Medvedev: Wikileaks 'Positive,' 'Healthy'
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 06:16 PM
Jun 2012

Last edited Tue Jun 26, 2012, 11:58 AM - Edit history (9)

It is telling that you only worry about 'embarrasment'.......

Medvedev: Wikileaks 'Positive,' 'Healthy'

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/8012750-medvedev-wikileaks-positive-healthy

At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev tried to reassure world business leaders by insisting that Russia remains a good place for investment and that the country is dedicated to global engagement. He said that no country was immune to terrorism and that the recent airport terror could have taken place anywhere in the world. Medvedev also said that Russia is weary of being lectured about democracy.

Afterward, Medvedev was asked a question which likely caught him off guard. He was asked what his response would be if wikileaks released secret Russian documents damaging to the government. He said that wikileaks releases could have a positive impact on international relations. "At the end of the day, I believe this WikiLeaks story should make the spirit of international relations healthier even if, in itself, this was an illegal activity," he said. "The impact of the story for international relations is quite positive."

Medvedev said that the wikileaks releases of US diplomatic cables -- which branded Russia "a mafia state -- did not shock him. "From my perspective, from what I read concerning Russia from the materials which found their way to WikiLeaks, there has been nothing new to me in it," he said, smiling. "I got the sense that most assessments that found their way to WikiLeaks concerning Russia were taken from the general political sites on the Internet."


Intersting thing Medvedev said: general political sites on the Internet

I have not analyzed this but I have a feeling I wouldn't need to.....How much of the US information that was released, was similar information (to that available on the Web)? If it is similar information: Why is it classified here in America? It is ridiculous. More secrecy.

I am sure Medvedev thinks before he speaks. He said what he said for a reason if even what was meant was Russia hides it's dirty laundry better better than America does. Damn. Slam either way. Such is the world and some that are fools in it and Medvedev is not the fool either... Lol.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R'd. snot Jun 2012 #1
Mrs Assange is correct clang1 Jun 2012 #2
I think this whole thing is about getting Assange to the US to face charges! teddy51 Jun 2012 #3
Confirmation that US & Sweden have been discussing extradition to the US since at least snot Jun 2012 #20
Yep. Assange stepped on the head of a snake clang1 Jun 2012 #50
Then go to Sweden and face it treestar Jun 2012 #4
You point fingers in the wrong places clang1 Jun 2012 #5
Then explain why Sweden ( a country with a progressive system if there ever was one) treestar Jun 2012 #8
Let someone else answer you, you present nothing new and seem to be asleep even. n/t clang1 Jun 2012 #11
Treestar premise is: RobertEarl Jun 2012 #53
And how do you know Julian is in no danger? Is that sort of like Bradley Manning is in no danger? teddy51 Jun 2012 #12
Because the SCOTUS says he can't be charged. jeff47 Jun 2012 #15
Except that I wouldn't trust either SCOTUS or the US Government to keep there word. teddy51 Jun 2012 #18
Now if that isn't anti-US derangement syndrome, I don't know what is treestar Jun 2012 #23
Flag on the play. Adapted right wing meme. 10 yards. LeftyMom Jun 2012 #31
So it's also used for any one treestar Jun 2012 #36
It's still cribbing a stupid idea from Charles freakin' Krauthammer. LeftyMom Jun 2012 #39
Yep. Quite a piece of work there, eh? and in more ways than one. n/t clang1 Jun 2012 #44
Let me explain to you what US derangement syndrome is clang1 Jun 2012 #46
There was no word granted jeff47 Jun 2012 #43
Yet our own Defense Secretary weighed in... ljm2002 Jun 2012 #62
Very good point. They expose themselves just as greedy salivating people usually do clang1 Jun 2012 #63
So your evidence is the Defense Secretary doesn't like the guy. jeff47 Jun 2012 #65
Assange was nabbed in the UK... ljm2002 Jun 2012 #66
All too many people are just plain drones that do not appear to think n/t clang1 Jun 2012 #69
Again, waiting for Sweden to act makes completely no sense. jeff47 Jun 2012 #70
There is no need to show "past difficulties"... ljm2002 Jun 2012 #72
So slap them blinders on? jeff47 Jun 2012 #73
You are wrong about "my entire argument"... ljm2002 Jun 2012 #74
you didn't look if you "have found 0 cases" reorg Jun 2012 #75
Pffft clang1 Jun 2012 #68
Apparently you don't believe eyewitnesses provide evidence. jeff47 Jun 2012 #71
Because in the US you get a trial treestar Jun 2012 #22
Not a fair trial perhaps, but a kangaroo court trial (just ask his lawyers). teddy51 Jun 2012 #27
We do not have "kangaroo courts" treestar Jun 2012 #29
How terribly, cruelly naive. Better hope nobody you care about --> daaron Jun 2012 #33
Good grief! treestar Jun 2012 #37
Makes no sense clang1 Jun 2012 #49
no, 95% of all cases are resolved through plea bargaining reorg Jun 2012 #41
Nonsense: The Supreme Court is our best example of a kangaroo court. Vidar Jun 2012 #60
BOLD FACED LIES clang1 Jun 2012 #48
The US is terrible and corrupt, that has been witnessed over and over again. Why should teddy51 Jun 2012 #6
Because if your theory was correct, the UK would have already extradited him to the US. jeff47 Jun 2012 #17
Uhhhhhhh Iggy Jun 2012 #13
No, you're merely saying Julian should get away with publishing our documents treestar Jun 2012 #25
Facts are facts - if they're embarrassing, so be it. nt daaron Jun 2012 #34
How has this "embarrassment" solved anything? treestar Jun 2012 #40
Even the russians are not 'embarrased' Medvedev: Wikileaks 'Positive,' 'Healthy' clang1 Jun 2012 #52
The problem is exceptionalism Iggy Jun 2012 #57
Why do you want to "embarrass America", Iggy? daaron Jun 2012 #58
No Effort from me Required Iggy Jun 2012 #64
What happened to "Mr. Transparency"? Iggy Jun 2012 #56
What has the US done to stop torture and rendition, treestar- take off the rose colored glasses larkrake Jun 2012 #67
If Assange engaged in actions "against the US"... ljm2002 Jun 2012 #61
buoyed by support as in buoyed up ? dipsydoodle Jun 2012 #7
Wow! OnyxCollie Jun 2012 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author OnyxCollie Jun 2012 #10
I.m.h.o., Wikileaks and Assange snot Jun 2012 #14
I'd believe in them if they leaked any other country's secrets jeff47 Jun 2012 #16
Pls read the post you replied to. snot Jun 2012 #19
All of that information came from US documents jeff47 Jun 2012 #42
Wikileaks got Icelandic banksters put in jail. EFerrari Jun 2012 #47
Very logical thinking, no? n/t clang1 Jun 2012 #24
The US runs the entire world, in the supporters' minds treestar Jun 2012 #28
Makes no sense n/t clang1 Jun 2012 #30
Vast majority of Wikileaks focus has always been non-US. daaron Jun 2012 #35
That is Wikileaks taking credit for all sorts of things treestar Jun 2012 #26
Read again. Those are simply observations of US officials et al. that were revealed by Wikileaks snot Jun 2012 #54
Should he try and get Fast and Furious documents to leak? joeglow3 Jun 2012 #32
Yes. I would as well were I an Investigative Journalist concerned with the law, clang1 Jun 2012 #38
thanks for providing this list reorg Jun 2012 #45
What Assange is clang1 Jun 2012 #21
Torture option still alive and well clang1 Jun 2012 #51
Fortunately, Wikileaks will endure regardless of Assange's fate. Robb Jun 2012 #55
Your post is quite bizarre clang1 Jun 2012 #59
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Wikileaks founder Julian ...»Reply #52