Circumcision is grievous bodily harm, German judges rule

[go west young man]

56. I'm gonna call bullshit on ya for a couple of reasons.

1) Have you ever changed the diaper of an infant female after she has pooped? There's plenty of nasty things that get in there.
2) Your argument sounds similar to a sexist male asshole who tells women what to do with their bodies. You cannot possibly know what male infants go through. You are just speculating.
3) I already pointed out to you that I never had a problem with anything "accumulating on my foreskin".
4) You call it a loose tip? Have you ever seen a male sheath?
5) TP (toilet paper) has never gathered on my 3 year old son's uncircumcised penis. Why would it?
6) Why would you want to deny boys and men the extra pleasure that comes from having that so called "loose tip"?
7) The argument that it is painful to do later in life rather than sooner is a redundant one. It is an unnecessary operation entirely.
Those who want it later are free to endure that pain. But why should an innocent boy endure that and lose their own right to decide?
8) In post 38 you seem to have missed my point about being impoverished. I was talking turn of the 20th century leading up to the first world war. Google Hiram Yellen and the history of circumcision in the US. You can see more clearly how it all came into being the norm in the states.