Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

christx30

(6,241 posts)

4. Well, the court would have to rule

Reply to DorothyG (Reply #3)

Tue Aug 16, 2016, 10:07 PM

Aug 2016

that the feds have no business regulating certain controlled substances. But until that happens, we just have to hope that the good people of Kansas are able to convince their state reps that marijuana has therapeutic qualities. So people are pretty much at the mercy of either state reps for the feds.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Court says feds can�t prosecute for medical pot use OKd by state [View all] jpak Aug 2016 OP

Good ruling. christx30 Aug 2016 #1

What ruling might be needed for DorothyG Aug 2016 #3

Well, the court would have to rule christx30 Aug 2016 #4

Well I honestly dont foresee SCOTUS ever making a ruling that the federal cstanleytech Aug 2016 #5

Oh I agree completely. christx30 Aug 2016 #7

Well you don't necessarily need a friendly Democratic cstanleytech Aug 2016 #8

excellent! k & r! n/t wildbilln864 Aug 2016 #2

EAT IT DEA! Rex Aug 2016 #6

um TeamPooka Aug 2016 #9

Baby step by baby step StrictlyRockers Aug 2016 #10

Worrisome awoke_in_2003 Aug 2016 #11

No, that isn't what the ruling says . . . markpkessinger Aug 2016 #12

I hope people remember that this is only for medicinal ripcord Aug 2016 #13