Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(8,935 posts)

12. No, that isn't what the ruling says . . .

Wed Aug 17, 2016, 01:19 AM

Aug 2016

. . . It says that another federal law passed by Congress invalidates federal prosecutions in states that legalize marijuana.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Court says feds can�t prosecute for medical pot use OKd by state [View all] jpak Aug 2016 OP

Good ruling. christx30 Aug 2016 #1

What ruling might be needed for DorothyG Aug 2016 #3

Well, the court would have to rule christx30 Aug 2016 #4

Well I honestly dont foresee SCOTUS ever making a ruling that the federal cstanleytech Aug 2016 #5

Oh I agree completely. christx30 Aug 2016 #7

Well you don't necessarily need a friendly Democratic cstanleytech Aug 2016 #8

excellent! k & r! n/t wildbilln864 Aug 2016 #2

EAT IT DEA! Rex Aug 2016 #6

um TeamPooka Aug 2016 #9

Baby step by baby step StrictlyRockers Aug 2016 #10

Worrisome awoke_in_2003 Aug 2016 #11

No, that isn't what the ruling says . . . markpkessinger Aug 2016 #12

I hope people remember that this is only for medicinal ripcord Aug 2016 #13