Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

VMA131Marine

(5,283 posts)
26. We send low power laser beams out of the atmosphere all the time
Wed Aug 24, 2016, 04:00 PM
Aug 2016

If you know where to point it, you can use a laser to measure the distance to the moon by bouncing the beam off one of the mirrors left by the Apollo missions. The thrust produced by the laser would be very low, but a craft could achieve huge speeds by operating the beam continuously. Theoretically, the speed would asymptotically approach the speed of light itself, although it could never quite get there, of course.

The momentum of a photon is h/wavelength, where h is Planck's constant. If you have an ideal mirror, the momentum imparted to the spacecraft by one photon would be double the initial momentum of the photon.

According to my (non-relativistic) estimates, a 10GW red laser at 633nm could accelerate a 1000kg spacecraft so that it reached Proxima Centauri in 34 years. The spacecraft would be travelling at 25% of the speed of light at that point so it would not spend much time in that neighborhood as it would have no way to slow down.

You would not want to get in the way of the laser beam unless you were highly reflective.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

How near its star is that planet Dale Neiburg Aug 2016 #1
This is from another website PJMcK Aug 2016 #5
Thanks. The other question is how long has the star been a red dwarf? Fast Walker 52 Aug 2016 #16
Pretty much once a red dwarf, always a red dwarf. longship Aug 2016 #31
What about the energy output from its star? Is it powerful enough to have cstanleytech Aug 2016 #20
Hard to know, I suspect PJMcK Aug 2016 #30
Holy @$%@#$@#$. This is awesome. byronius Aug 2016 #2
send those drones! they can scout it within my freaking lifetime Fast Walker 52 Aug 2016 #17
in 100 years, interstellar colonization will be a Thing 0rganism Aug 2016 #3
That's the last thing that the universe needs! Orrex Aug 2016 #6
if the universe has objections, it will have to raise them soon 0rganism Aug 2016 #15
I doubt it! Buckeye_Democrat Aug 2016 #19
This is great! Proxima Centauri was more familiar to me as Hortensis Aug 2016 #4
Oh goody! A new place for humans Cirque du So-What Aug 2016 #7
There are literally uncountable worlds out there for us to mess up. Frank Cannon Aug 2016 #21
By the time we fuck up that planet your Great Great Great Great Great Great Great Grandchildren snooper2 Aug 2016 #25
The laser-propelled probes sound like complete fiction n2doc Aug 2016 #8
Strictly speaking, photons have NO mass VWolf Aug 2016 #12
Not really fiction, but it won't be easy. Buckeye_Democrat Aug 2016 #22
We send low power laser beams out of the atmosphere all the time VMA131Marine Aug 2016 #26
They mention accelerating the probe to 0.2c in less than 3 days. n2doc Aug 2016 #28
They talk about tiny probes ... VMA131Marine Aug 2016 #29
IOW, we have a place to go if Trump wins. Yavin4 Aug 2016 #9
So how much is real estate there? Blue_Tires Aug 2016 #10
We better get our act together. The Centaurans could be here any day now. tclambert Aug 2016 #11
We should seed it with the self-proclaimed best DNA we have...The Nasty Man(tm), to space. n/t jtuck004 Aug 2016 #13
25,000,000,000,000 miles away. Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we there yet? 63splitwindow Aug 2016 #14
I want ice cream!... I have to go to the bathroom! Fast Walker 52 Aug 2016 #18
I for one welcome our new Proxima Centuri Overlords RapSoDee Aug 2016 #23
11.2 days? freebrew Aug 2016 #24
DeGrasse will have a wet dream over this sailfla Aug 2016 #27
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Earth-sized planet around...»Reply #26