Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: EpiPen maker lowers price after uproar [View all]Hortensis
(58,785 posts)100. Wow. Being fairly free of medications so far, I confess
I hadn't thought it through to realize those rebates counted against the deductible and coinsurance. We've had one between the two of us--a $700 one-time medicine (which certainly wouldn't have done it on its own, but what if we expected to run up more bills?). But wiping out the deductible and more is like paying the patient to use a hyperpriced medication, and certainly allows the provider to prescribe it.
Thanks for the insight, Massacure.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Judiciary Committee hearing still should take place, even for cynical political reasons.
ancianita
Aug 2016
#1
Fraudulent billing and fantasy numbers- my chemo experience ($250,000 for 12 rounds)
wordpix
Aug 2016
#112
drug companies are in bed with insurance companies---drug pricing is a huge scam
wordpix
Aug 2016
#109
what, and rap the wrists of their puppetmasters? Won't happen, or it will be just for show
wordpix
Aug 2016
#110
That's my cynical take, but who knows; something might just get done. Obama's taught me hope.
ancianita
Aug 2016
#111
unfortunately, the noncompetitive drug pricing is Congress' doing - we need more Dems
wordpix
Aug 2016
#113
They met, came up with a dozen options and picked the one lowest the gullible would accept.
TheBlackAdder
Aug 2016
#2
So does this mean they have still increased the price from $100 to $300. The way I read this, they
EV_Ares
Aug 2016
#3
The maker of the EpiPen is playing another dirty trick right from Martin Shkreli's book
EV_Ares
Aug 2016
#49
That's what it sounds like to me too. The first price rise was a negotiating ploy — ask for . . .
brush
Aug 2016
#53
I saw a Tweet from a doctor that said that his cost on the med and a syringe is $2.71.
onehandle
Aug 2016
#6
So the truth is people are having to pay for the apparatus not the Epinephrine. Unconscionable
YOHABLO
Aug 2016
#68
So true... I get charged around $500 for, literally, a 5 minute well visit with a nurse
Francis Booth
Aug 2016
#69
FWIW: America: What Went Wrong is available free with Amazon Kindle Unlimited subscription.
napi21
Aug 2016
#42
also they did NOT reduce the list price. What they did is provide a "savings card" only for those
still_one
Aug 2016
#19
First of all 300 dollars is still too much. Epinephrine is extremely inexpensive, and it is stil
still_one
Aug 2016
#16
EpiPen needs to be $2.00 retail and over the counter so the Corp will make 50% profit.
Sunlei
Aug 2016
#27
This way they can write it off as a business loss and we will pay for it through the govt.
cbdo2007
Aug 2016
#51
The problem isn't that EpiPen is being immoral. The problem is, there's no reason they should care.
Oneironaut
Aug 2016
#54
"government has no desire to break up monopolies anymore" We need a Teddy Roosevelt
wordpix
Aug 2016
#66
Outrageous that there's no competition, and Mylan pushed laws to REQUIRE pens in schools/facilities
johnnyrocket
Aug 2016
#107
thanks to repukes, the fed gov cannot buy ANY drugs from competing companies outside US
wordpix
Aug 2016
#108
But aren't they still charging insurance companies and the governments the high prices?
PersonNumber503602
Aug 2016
#117