Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Jill Stein fires back at Liz Warren [View all]megahertz
(182 posts)7. What does Stein think she herself has done to actually earn a vote?
I mean, she can explain why she thinks she's the best candidate until she's blue, but hey, I could explain why I think *I* am the best candidate, as can anyone who can string sentences together. What has she actually done that has earned a vote, as she says, or warrants anyone giving her the Presidential office? I'm baffled as to why she considers herself knowledgeable and experienced enough to do the job.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
138 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, Jill is a crackpot communist who marvels at Soviet-style collectivism and central planning
bluestateguy
Aug 2016
#1
The upper-middle class loony "latte liberal" technophobes are the Green Party's base.
Odin2005
Aug 2016
#131
I am quite sure Hillary Clinton or her campaign do not come here looking for advice...
Spazito
Aug 2016
#117
you're just pointing out that in her ridiculous candidacy she said one thing right
CreekDog
Aug 2016
#98
Either Clinton or Trump will be the next President. If you don't care which it is ...
William Seger
Aug 2016
#63
Nader without the accomplishments. Getting Republicans Elected Every November. nt
geek tragedy
Aug 2016
#65
And Stein is not entitled to our votes just because she's a Green party candidate.
maddiemom
Aug 2016
#4
Jill Stein is another example of how someone can be intelligent, but still not be very smart
Siwsan
Aug 2016
#5
I base the intelligence remark on the fact she did make it through medical school and training
Siwsan
Aug 2016
#47
Next you will tell me that my garlic wreaths aren't keeping the vampires away!!!!
Siwsan
Aug 2016
#51
From what I see at universities these days, it takes pretty minimal intelligence
Blasphemer
Aug 2016
#53
Yea, but she is not a recent graduate - she graduated from Harvard Medical school in 1979
Siwsan
Aug 2016
#55
"Real change" will happen if you vote for Stein just as it did for those that voted for Nader
Renew Deal
Aug 2016
#10
here's another article on how Nader "was indispensable to the Republican party"
sherlocksistah
Aug 2016
#84
What you say is true, and completely irrelevant to whether Nader was a "but-for" cause.
BzaDem
Aug 2016
#124
Just to clarify, you're speaking hypothetically as an explanation for why someone on the left
Fla Dem
Aug 2016
#44
No I think not correct, it presumes a protest vote is the only reason to vote for other
HereSince1628
Aug 2016
#70
“Politicians are not ‘entitled’ to our votes simply because they represent the establishment ....
marble falls
Aug 2016
#42
Perhaps she could have used her time giving her position but just as with Trump
Thinkingabout
Aug 2016
#76
Worse still is a two party election system. Thrird parties are made irrelevant by the system.
marble falls
Aug 2016
#89
So you think Jill Stein would have done better if she ran as a Democrat like Bernie did?
Fla Dem
Aug 2016
#132
But Jill. It's YOU who has to earn our vote too - you can't just say stuff and think people are
Kashkakat v.2.0
Aug 2016
#102
As Stein says, she's not entitled to the votes of liberals, Hillary has done more to earn the votes
CreekDog
Aug 2016
#112
"Invest" implies a return. A vote for Stein will return nothing but a sense of smug superiority...
BobbyDrake
Aug 2016
#136