Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Ralph Nader: Bernie Sanders' Opposition to Third Parties is Why His Movement is in Disarray [View all]stupidicus
(2,570 posts)41. well, he said nothing that there that the dishonest idiocy of
"he gave us Bush" or some such bs won't completely rebut.
I suppose it's better that he get the blame than say all those dems that voted for Bush in FL, ect, etc, etc.
We were told, a million times over, that the 2000 election came down to 560 Florida voters that cast ballots for the Green Party candidate Ralph Nader. A vote for the Green Party is a vote for Republicans, goes the old saw.
It was not that Gore lost the votes of tens of thousands of white women who voted Republican by a huge margin of 53 % Bush to 44% Gore. Oh no, it was the 600 or so Nader voters.
It wasnt that 12-13% of registered Democrats voted for Bush. It wasnt that the Democratic base deserted the party and gave about 300,000 votes to Bush in Florida. Thats right, 12 times more Democrats votes for Bush than Nader. But no, no, no it was the 600 Green voters that elected Bush.
It wasnt the 30-35% of union members that vote Republican year after year. Nope. http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/06/06/the-myth-of-the-spoiler-why-the-machine-elites-fear-democracy/
There are far better ways to undermine his opinion in this instance than dragging out that stale turd, but if you suffer from intellectual sloth or integrity deficits, whatcha gonna do eh? I for example, would like to know how he knows a guy who's shunned him for 18 years so well, and based upon what did he arrive at the ONLY possible conclusion of BS suffering from a distaste for third parties. As far as I can tell, BS is is advocating only for a dem vote for POTUS, not down ticket offices, where he's be fine with a third party vote.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ralph Nader: Bernie Sanders' Opposition to Third Parties is Why His Movement is in Disarray [View all]
molova
Sep 2016
OP
Nader's looking for publicity--he is BULLSHIT that Sanders is the flavor of the month amongst
MADem
Sep 2016
#50
I have no sympathy for anyone who shills for Ralph Nader--this is Democratic Underground,
MADem
Sep 2016
#48
Nader can go to hell. He is an irrelevant loser. Bernie's supporters are not in disarray
still_one
Sep 2016
#7
His ego and his arragance have destroyed him. Ironically similar characteristics to
still_one
Sep 2016
#14
I love how Stein and all the Alt-lefties have thrown Sanders under the bus now
Blue_Tires
Sep 2016
#19
Knowing that makes me respect Sanders even more. I'm with Bernie, fuck Ralph Nader.
brush
Sep 2016
#58
Scarey isn't at how many now here have abandoned their traditional Democratic principles
LiberalLovinLug
Sep 2016
#47
In reality, Sanders is one of the most powerful Senators in the country.
world wide wally
Sep 2016
#27
nader's 'democraxy' shtick is great in THEORY. but amerikans are too ILL-INFORMED BY A
pansypoo53219
Sep 2016
#33
What is "news" about this? Did you ever read the SOP of "Latest Breaking News"? Here:
George II
Sep 2016
#49