Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Texas boy charged for setting special needs child on fire [View all]Judi Lynn
(160,451 posts)30. I'd support bringing some charge against the person who opted to go with the "arson" charge!
I always believed "arson" is used in charges involving property.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The article doesn't say specifically, but i'm assuming the perpetrator of the arson
Calista241
Oct 2016
#3
what ever happened to charging the parents. The child learned this behavior at home.
juxtaposed
Oct 2016
#31
i seriously doubt the kid learned how to burn someone nearly to death at home.
Calista241
Oct 2016
#33
I recanted the parents b/c of the full story of what really happened but, yes
juxtaposed
Oct 2016
#34
When someone decides to to do a deliberate "ACT" of design to hurt someone else
turbinetree
Oct 2016
#4
During that period of my life( age 9-12) for some reason I was also bullied.....
Old Vet
Oct 2016
#11
anyone who could do that--I don't care about age--is fundamentally broken inside their head
geek tragedy
Oct 2016
#16
I don't understand why he's being charged with 1st degree arson instead of
justiceischeap
Oct 2016
#22
If this is true than all the hang the kid, throw away the key stuff above is moot.
juxtaposed
Oct 2016
#32
I'd support bringing some charge against the person who opted to go with the "arson" charge!
Judi Lynn
Oct 2016
#30