Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump up 2 in latest Rasmussen poll [View all]Coyotl
(15,262 posts)43. Daily Kos Elections 2016 forecast: Hillary Clinton's victory odds now back up to 83 percent
Daily Kos Elections 2016 forecast: Hillary Clinton's victory odds now back up to 83 percent
On the morning Monday, October 3, we had a few post-debate polls under our belt and Clintons overall odds were up to 72 percent but we were still left wondering why everything was so quiet on the polling front. By the end of Monday, though, the deluge had arrived, and with one exception (Quinnipiacs Ohio poll), everything was very good news for Clinton: among others, a Clinton +11 poll from Monmouth in Colorado, another Clinton +11 poll in Colorado from Keating Research, polls from Quinnipiac with Clinton +5 in Florida and +3 in North Carolina, a Clinton +9 poll in Pennsylvania from Franklin & Marshall, a Clinton +3 poll in Nevada from Hart Research, and a Clinton +7 poll in Virginia from Christopher Newport Univ.
It may well have been her single best polling day of the cycle, and by Tuesday her odds had jumped to 82 percent, a one-day gain of 10. That matches the largest single-day gain our model has seen since we started running. That other gain of 10 happened between August 8 and 9; in case youre wondering what was happening then, that was the Monday after the Democratic convention ended, when the post-DNC polls started to show up. So you could say that the debate was one of the most momentous events of the campaign: if your metric is the effect it had on our model, she got a convention-sized bounce out of it.
The subsequent days have seen even more strong poll results, most notably two different polls on Wednesday (from Monmouth and Anzalone Liszt) giving Clinton a 2-point lead in Ohio ............
On the morning Monday, October 3, we had a few post-debate polls under our belt and Clintons overall odds were up to 72 percent but we were still left wondering why everything was so quiet on the polling front. By the end of Monday, though, the deluge had arrived, and with one exception (Quinnipiacs Ohio poll), everything was very good news for Clinton: among others, a Clinton +11 poll from Monmouth in Colorado, another Clinton +11 poll in Colorado from Keating Research, polls from Quinnipiac with Clinton +5 in Florida and +3 in North Carolina, a Clinton +9 poll in Pennsylvania from Franklin & Marshall, a Clinton +3 poll in Nevada from Hart Research, and a Clinton +7 poll in Virginia from Christopher Newport Univ.
It may well have been her single best polling day of the cycle, and by Tuesday her odds had jumped to 82 percent, a one-day gain of 10. That matches the largest single-day gain our model has seen since we started running. That other gain of 10 happened between August 8 and 9; in case youre wondering what was happening then, that was the Monday after the Democratic convention ended, when the post-DNC polls started to show up. So you could say that the debate was one of the most momentous events of the campaign: if your metric is the effect it had on our model, she got a convention-sized bounce out of it.
The subsequent days have seen even more strong poll results, most notably two different polls on Wednesday (from Monmouth and Anzalone Liszt) giving Clinton a 2-point lead in Ohio ............
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, he's the expert, but that just seems wrong. You shouldn't get an A for being CONSISTENLY wrong
BlueStreak
Oct 2016
#27
Knowing that Trump went up 1 point -- from whatever he was before -- is information.
ColemanMaskell
Oct 2016
#58
B.S. Trump is performing worse than Romney with the AA, Latino, female and college educated
Trust Buster
Oct 2016
#3
Gallup Had Romney Up by 7 and Rasmussen by About 5 in the Months Before 2012 Election
Stallion
Oct 2016
#14
In trying to tilt the 2012 election to Romney, GallOP managed to piss everyone off.
forest444
Oct 2016
#62
How could the VP debate be just as important when it got far far far fewer viewers than the first
bravenak
Oct 2016
#15
It isn't, this is just the R/W Raz report being puffed up by the right wing Washington Examiner
still_one
Oct 2016
#19
Oh FFS, this is the washington examiner puffing up a Rasmussen poll which has always
still_one
Oct 2016
#16
TomCADEm has to look long and hard to find the JPR favorable articles
alcibiades_mystery
Oct 2016
#37
Imagine the hatred of Hillary causing a progressive to embrace that shit
alcibiades_mystery
Oct 2016
#42
Imagine being so angry about primaries that you'd still be running this act in October!
alcibiades_mystery
Oct 2016
#38
This was an on line survey where one can delete cookies,refresh, and vote as many times as they
INdemo
Oct 2016
#32
Rasmussen is a repug poll. It doesn't reflect the entire demographic and is not worth worrying about
brush
Oct 2016
#35
Daily Kos Elections 2016 forecast: Hillary Clinton's victory odds now back up to 83 percent
Coyotl
Oct 2016
#43
STOP POSTING THIS SHIT POLLING. IT IS SHIT. TOTAL SHIT. COMPLETE SHIT. UNENDING SHIT. GET IT?
RBInMaine
Oct 2016
#45
Washington Examiner ...... Owned by Phil Anschutz , owner of Clarity Media Group
Kathy M
Oct 2016
#47
In order to get their creds, Rasmussen later gets closer to the other polls
Stargleamer
Oct 2016
#56