Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

red dog 1

(33,471 posts)
23. "The fact that something is a big deal on DU does not mean it's a big deal in the real world"
Thu Jul 5, 2012, 01:56 AM
Jul 2012

implies that DU is not even a small part of "the real world",,..It ultimately comes down to semantics...How do you define "real world"?.....Isn't the Internet a part of the "real world"?..Don't DUers live in the "real world"?...
Aren't WikiLeaks, Julian Assange and Bradley Manning all part of the "real world"?

You are wrong saying "it's not a topic on the national news broadcasts".
It's not a topic that's covered every single day, perhaps, .. but MSM AND the alternative media such as Huffington Post et. al. ARE covering this story, but only when there are new developments, ...such as Assange losing his British court battle to avoid extradition to Sweden, his seeking asylum at the Equadorian embassy, and Bradley Manning's trial.....Those events were and are being covered by the MSM, including the national news broadcasts.

One thing I can agree with you on, however, is
"DU is a very small corner of the Internet full of smart, politically aware Democrats that are much more informed and passionate about what is happening in the world than the average American."



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Nothing to see here, folks. Move along. Move along. leveymg Jul 2012 #1
How disingenuous Demeter Jul 2012 #2
U.S. CITIZENS aren't interested in what's happening with Assange? red dog 1 Jul 2012 #3
But it is true hack89 Jul 2012 #9
"Assange is not a topic of discussion in America"? red dog 1 Jul 2012 #14
Most of the topics on here are not topics in reality... Comrade_McKenzie Jul 2012 #19
Thanks for making my point hack89 Jul 2012 #20
"The fact that something is a big deal on DU does not mean it's a big deal in the real world" red dog 1 Jul 2012 #23
Suuuureee.... Fearless Jul 2012 #4
Assange did not release the documents. He published them on the internet. JDPriestly Jul 2012 #8
That's my point. It's all bull shit. Fearless Jul 2012 #10
Reminds Me of April Glasby's Assurance to Saddam Hussein that U.S. Wouldn't Intervene triplepoint Jul 2012 #5
+1 Excellent example. Lionessa Jul 2012 #13
I'll give you a hint... EX500rider Jul 2012 #17
Yep, I thought of it while I was out. Senior moments, what can I say, I know, just escapes me fttt. Lionessa Jul 2012 #21
He does have a point about it being as easy from the UK treestar Jul 2012 #6
False. Hissyspit Jul 2012 #15
What is false about that? treestar Jul 2012 #18
I'll see if I can find it, but I read an explanation about Lionessa Jul 2012 #22
This is a start: Hissyspit Jul 2012 #24
Thank you, when I googled I got so overwhelmed with that days news, regardless of word choice, Lionessa Jul 2012 #26
How do you know they haven't? Hissyspit Jul 2012 #25
As if the ambassador would know. JDPriestly Jul 2012 #7
''He's not the household name in the US that you might think,'' he said. TouchOfGray Jul 2012 #11
Do they know the name of the Vice President? Hissyspit Jul 2012 #16
Apparently he and Diane Fienstein are not on the same page this week. Lionessa Jul 2012 #12
If US is not interested in Assange why does WAPO propose economic pressure be applied on Ecuador? cqo_000 Jul 2012 #27
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US not interested in Assa...»Reply #23