Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
20. AT LEAST $600 million!
Fri Jul 6, 2012, 09:35 AM
Jul 2012

I distinctly remember the first time I saw the grotesquely-tanned Mozilo addressing a sizable contingent of his 'loyal minions' and throwing out the statistic that "20% of high risk loans end in foreclosure." Mozilo then asserted, "we are looking at this statistic all wrong" --pausing for dramatic effect-- "This means that 80% of high risk loans (emphasis his) are successful." Mozilo informed us that Countrywide intended to tap into this vast pool of potential borrowers--what he called the 'historically disenfranchised' borrowers--and went on to describe the new sub-prime products Countrywide was introducing to the public.

This was all smoke and mirrors. Every GOOD lender knows that credit-worthiness is the cornerstone of mortgage underwriting. But, it didn't take long for savvy loan officers to understand that anyone could be made 'eligible' for a home loan.

I had clients who wanted to 'buy' houses that were far outside their means, and they would NOT listen to my adjurations about being 'one paycheck away from financial catastrophe.' I realize now that these poor people just shopped around for a loan officer who would write the loan they wanted.

I could go on for days about how we were 'encouraged' to market the sub-primes. Of course, the big five were paying loan officers much higher commissions on the sub-primes, a fact that my manager threw in my face each time he berated me for not marketing those vile pieces of corporatist crap.

Most loan officers were totally on board the sub-prime bandwagon from the get go. Indeed, if I had been given my promotion when it was promised --in the spring of the first "year of the sub-primes"--I would have made a minimum of $40,000/month during those glory days, before I understood what these loans really represented. I was quite naive then. But, it didn't take me long to get the bigger picture. I now realize how lucky I was not to market OR write sub-prime loans. (I suspect that a few of my peers had similar experiences.)

I left (fortuitously) right before the internal auditors (Feds?) executed an early morning raid on our Galleria-area high-rise offices, re-keyed the locks, and confiscated all the files and computers. I had lunch with our admin one last time after that, but I don't know the legal outcome for my manager and his hotshot loan officers. Rumor has it they were writing homestead mortgages for a group of California real estate investors--a serious infraction both federally and internally.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A few names here...and it's a bi-partisan list. Wilms Jul 2012 #1
I don't see any Dems there that would be any great loss. n/t Ian David Jul 2012 #13
You have to remember that it is an Issa investigation Mnpaul Jul 2012 #14
Wow. Thanks for straightening me out on that. Wilms Jul 2012 #19
The Senate's findings were... hughee99 Jul 2012 #22
that is what I wanna know... dtom67 Jul 2012 #2
They're named in the report at a footnote at page 7: leveymg Jul 2012 #3
I've alway been a little dubious of this "preferential treatment" story. Hassin Bin Sober Jul 2012 #4
Indeed. And if the loan is tied to a brokerage account Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #5
WTF Skittles Jul 2012 #6
I'm with you, Skittles. This is sickening. yardwork Jul 2012 #9
They are considered a better credit risk Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #11
Because a 2% commission on a $3 million dollar loan is better than a 2% commission on a $150,000 loan Hassin Bin Sober Jul 2012 #17
Look at the Return on Investment - Mozilo's fine - $60 million, of which Countryside pays $20ish, jtuck004 Jul 2012 #18
AT LEAST $600 million! chervilant Jul 2012 #20
I'm glad you got out. The tyrants can't do their evil without other's arms and legs and eyes, jtuck004 Jul 2012 #21
Former heads of Fannie Mae James Johnson, Daniel Mudd and Franklin Raines. stockholmer Jul 2012 #7
Highly unlikely that the loans in question Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #12
...and those in Congress blamed it all on poor people. Filthy lying hypocrites. yardwork Jul 2012 #8
Gee ...are you implying that both sides are the same? L0oniX Jul 2012 #10
Its not that they are the same its that the same cstanleytech Jul 2012 #15
K&R. nt OnyxCollie Jul 2012 #16
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Countrywide issued hundre...»Reply #20