Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(67,170 posts)
34. Congress knew for at least two years about Pentagon efforts to take back bonuses from veterans
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 09:32 PM
Oct 2016

Source: Los Angeles Times

Congress knew for at least two years about Pentagon efforts to take back bonuses from veterans

By David S. Cloud and Sarah D. Wire
OCTOBER 24, 2016, 4:45 PM | REPORTING FROM WASHINGTON

The California National Guard told the state’s members of Congress two years ago that the Pentagon was trying to claw back reenlistment bonuses from thousands of soldiers, and even offered a proposal to mitigate the problem, but Congress took no action, according to a senior National Guard official.

The official added that improper bonuses had been paid to National Guard members in every state, raising the possibility that many more soldiers may owe large debts to the Pentagon.

“This is a national issue and affects all states,” Andreas Mueller, the chief of federal policy for the California Guard, wrote in an email to the state’s congressional delegation Monday. Attention had focused on California because it was “the only state that audited” bonus payments at the height of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, he added.

The Times reported Saturday that the Pentagon has been demanding repayment of enlistment bonuses — which often reached $15,000 or more — from thousands of California Guard soldiers, many of whom had served multiple combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. Audits completed last month concluded that 9,700 California Guard members were not entitled to the payments or that there had been errors in their paperwork.

Pentagon officials acknowledged Monday that the problem probably extends beyond California.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-bonus-guard-20161024-snap-story.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is just ridiculous TexasBushwhacker Oct 2016 #1
This is the California state government, not Obama EL34x4 Oct 2016 #3
Then Jerry Brown needs to fix it TexasBushwhacker Oct 2016 #5
I suppose he could but on the other hand this isnt like they didnt get the money they cstanleytech Oct 2016 #6
They were promised the money by officials TexasMommaWithAHat Oct 2016 #8
Yes they were promised some and they got that the extra money though was not supposed cstanleytech Oct 2016 #9
If the soldiers knew they were getting an improperly large bonus, than yes, I agree progree Oct 2016 #15
Yes but the government had specifically stated how much to pay them and cstanleytech Oct 2016 #20
They were also prohibited 2naSalit Oct 2016 #29
But if the mistake was made by the government, not by the soldier, it seems to me the Yo_Mama Oct 2016 #21
The government needs to just let it go... Blanks Oct 2016 #27
I read that it was the Pentagon. lonestarnot Oct 2016 #37
This doesn't surprise me at all unfortunately. NWCorona Oct 2016 #2
I hope every would be enlistee hears about this dixiegrrrrl Oct 2016 #4
The DOD and/or the State of California need to erase the mistake. leanforward Oct 2016 #7
How do they fix the real mistake? jbeing Oct 2016 #10
It ain't just California shadowmayor Oct 2016 #11
Selective Retention Bonus tcbrola Oct 2016 #12
I guess my question though is were the soldiers aware that they were not eligible? Massacure Oct 2016 #14
I was in the military. And the answer to your last question is hell yes. progree Oct 2016 #16
Many of them were not, I am sure. Yo_Mama Oct 2016 #22
And if the state decides to go after the soldiers for this, christx30 Oct 2016 #30
They ought to be able to, and ethics aside, think of this from a contract law standpoint. Yo_Mama Oct 2016 #24
Offer/acceptance/binding sounds simple enough to me. lonestarnot Oct 2016 #38
If any other employer paid out a bonus, then tried to take it back 12 years later...??? Crash2Parties Oct 2016 #13
This is a disgrace, they earned it! denbot Oct 2016 #23
equity DustyJoe Oct 2016 #28
This happening to my husband AwakeAtLast Oct 2016 #31
Sometimes the government should just eat the loss. Disgusting. Vinca Oct 2016 #33
Congress knew for at least two years about Pentagon efforts to take back bonuses from veterans Eugene Oct 2016 #34
Yet the Pentagon keeps making payments to contractors who are behind in their deliveries dflprincess Oct 2016 #35
If we make a big enough stink, maybe that will happen! lonestarnot Oct 2016 #39
Story is starting to pick up steam.... Upin Oct 2016 #41
They should go after those shrink-wrapped bundles of $9 billion dollars that disappeared in Iraq. Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2016 #40
They went back to Iraq during the worst of it. riderinthestorm Oct 2016 #36
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»National guard soldiers t...»Reply #34