Latest Breaking News

Pathwalker

(6,603 posts)

16. They've already stated this is their intention. She WILL be charged,

Reply to Historic NY (Reply #14)

Fri Nov 18, 2016, 12:21 PM

Nov 2016

because their base demands it - facts be damned.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

63 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jesse Jackson: Obama should pardon Hillary Clinton [View all] riversedge Nov 2016 OP

for what? FrenchieCat Nov 2016 #1

Precisely! nt longship Nov 2016 #3

exactly---what are the charges? And BTW, if Hillary is charged, so should be Colin Powell wordpix Nov 2016 #9

So should Trump, for destroying documentation against court orders. JHB Nov 2016 #44

same as nixon- any and all. mopinko Nov 2016 #11

For protection from POLITICAL PERSECUTION. Hortensis Nov 2016 #21

I posted a thread about this story in GD yesterday morning TexasTowelie Nov 2016 #2

Thanks. I missed it and will read now. riversedge Nov 2016 #8

The rightwing Republican machine got what it wanted. yallerdawg Nov 2016 #4

This is ridiculous. Jesse is out of his f'n mind LibraLiz1973 Nov 2016 #5

1 nitpicker Nov 2016 #6

??? For what? paleotn Nov 2016 #7

........ LeftInTX Nov 2016 #10

I wouldn't mind a blanket pardon for her at all. Fuck the GOP world wide wally Nov 2016 #12

Clinton cannot be pardoned. She has not been convicted of a crime. Nitram Nov 2016 #13

Riddle me this Brother Buzz Nov 2016 #24

OK, Brother, I checked it out and you're right and I was wrong. Nitram Nov 2016 #34

BECAUSE HE KNEW NIXON HAD DONE SOMETHING WRONG Skittles Nov 2016 #51

He never was a fan of the Clintons bc Bill didn't pick him as VP flygal Nov 2016 #28

If they are already cranking up the new hearings machine, they will be emboldened to push Historic NY Nov 2016 #14

They've already stated this is their intention. She WILL be charged, Pathwalker Nov 2016 #16

An indictment? IndyJones Nov 2016 #31

The difference Jesse forgets is the FBI already said what she did is not worth pursuing criminal cstanleytech Nov 2016 #15

For what ? obnoxiousdrunk Nov 2016 #17

He's afraid that the Trump justice department will find some way to indict her and Bill andym Nov 2016 #18

A retroactive, guilt-tinged pardon isn't the way to deal with such a possibility. Paladin Nov 2016 #19

Agree-- a pardon would smack of implied guilt andym Nov 2016 #20

Understood. Sorry that Rev. Jackson voiced this opinion, I've admired him for years. (nt) Paladin Nov 2016 #22

And that means what exactly? Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #37

Pesidential Pardon: Assumption of guilt by right wing. Horrible idea. Paladin Nov 2016 #45

She is never running for office again Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #46

All Sessions has to do at Justice is appoint a Special Prosecutor for Benghazi and classified emails Zen Democrat Nov 2016 #56

Absolutely,Obama owes this to her in my opinion. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #58

They don't care. And Hillary does not need to fight the rest of her life to stop them. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #61

I'm through with arguing with you. (nt) Paladin Nov 2016 #62

We can agree to disagree. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #63

Like to see Trump and his comrades try. phallon Nov 2016 #23

They will try. And don't assume they won't succeed...may I remind Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #38

While Smootchy advises Trump phallon Nov 2016 #42

Yes, Hillary deserves better. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #47

This is wrong on so many levels robbob Nov 2016 #25

Who care what they think. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #39

Yeah, you're right robbob Nov 2016 #53

By the time we 'know' it will be too late for a pardon. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #59

Even Trump's not stupid enough to pursue this non-crime BeyondGeography Nov 2016 #26

Mark my words. They will do this. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #40

There is nothing to pardon her for. What he should do is fire comey NOW while he is president still_one Nov 2016 #27

Its not good either way LiberalLovinLug Nov 2016 #29

They would appoint a special prosecutor. Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2016 #35

True enough LiberalLovinLug Nov 2016 #48

You are wrong and it is an easy bone to throw to their base. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #41

don't you have to be indicted first? 0rganism Nov 2016 #30

Nope. Nixon was never indicted. He was an "unindicted co-conspirator." Zen Democrat Nov 2016 #57

An earlier piece arguing for a Clinton pardon moonscape Nov 2016 #32

for what? tenderfoot Nov 2016 #33

Clinton could be sent to prison. Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #43

FOR WHAT? Skittles Nov 2016 #50

That won't matter Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #60

He should pardon her for anything to do with emails Demsrule86 Nov 2016 #36

SHE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING WRONG Skittles Nov 2016 #49

Ken Starr chained Susan MacDougal to a toilet in L.A. county jail Pathwalker Nov 2016 #54

You've lost your mind, old man. tavernier Nov 2016 #52

She hasn't been convicted of anything Politicub Nov 2016 #55