Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Washington State Will Enforce Penalties Against 4 'Faithless' Clinton Electors [View all]SunSeeker
(58,285 posts)77. I am using the Merriam-Webster definition of "authoritarian."
You are simply incorrect to state that I "think it's OK to describe as authoritarian someone who defies authority." I never said that and I do not think that.
I do not think "it's OK to apply any negative description we choose to people we don't like." But that does seem to apply to some people. I noticed during the primary, some Bernie fans were particularly fond of calling Hillary supporters authoritarians.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Washington State Will Enforce Penalties Against 4 'Faithless' Clinton Electors [View all]
DonViejo
Dec 2016
OP
I just realized that I was irresponsible... Pay fines for electors that didn't vote for Trump.
Thor_MN
Dec 2016
#83
The Florida AG was the state's chairman for Gore. Florida's Secretary of State was Bush's chair. n/t
24601
Dec 2016
#45
In all the discussion about the EC, I've never seen an apologist even try to answer that question.
JustinL
Dec 2016
#25
Frankly, at this point I don;t give a shit what the founders wanted with respect to the EC.
Adrahil
Dec 2016
#69
That Maine elector's vote was ruled invalid and then he changed his vote to HRC. (NT)
Eric J in MN
Dec 2016
#62
So when an elector decides he should override the vote of the public he was supposed to represent...
SunSeeker
Dec 2016
#46
How is his being able to overrule the will of the many not a "concentration of power"?
SunSeeker
Dec 2016
#50
Electoral College is supposed to represent the will of the voters in each INDIVIDUAL state
Lurks Often
Dec 2016
#58
No. We can't communicate if we don't have a common understanding of what words mean.
SunSeeker
Dec 2016
#73