Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)

4. And that may be intentional as a way to diminish interest.

Reply to proverbialwisdom (Reply #3)

Sat Jul 14, 2012, 10:55 AM

Jul 2012

"Foodies" sounds like it's a bunch of elitists who can afford to pay whatever it takes to buy their superior food.

I must admit that I never thought of the Union of Concerned Scientists as "foodies." Who knew?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Foodies mobilize against effort to speed GMO approvals [View all] proverbialwisdom Jul 2012 OP

So the Tea Party pushed through cuts to starve the poor and pay off big business. Great! freshwest Jul 2012 #1

Foodies? KT2000 Jul 2012 #2

Exactly what I thought about the poor title (which does not match the article content, incidentally) proverbialwisdom Jul 2012 #3

And that may be intentional as a way to diminish interest. Gormy Cuss Jul 2012 #4

You know, humans. n/t BlueToTheBone Jul 2012 #7

There really aren't any associations with human health 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #8

Can you write that in a sentence roody Jul 2012 #9

I'm pretty sure it makes perfect sense 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #10

Now I get what you are saying. roody Jul 2012 #11

Glad foodies are on board. Thanks for link to GMWatch website. GM Myths is really valuable. Overseas Jul 2012 #5

yes lovuian Jul 2012 #6