Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Geithner drawn into Libor scandal [View all]leveymg
(36,418 posts)51. 1) NY Fed knew for at least a year before any sort of memo was sent. 2) Nothing was said publicly.
As head of the NY Fed, Geithner had a fiduciary responsibility to alert the public that key rates and indices were being manipulated. He didn't.
It was nice knowing you, Tim.
New York Fed Says It Knew Barclays Was Underreporting Libor
Caroline Salas Gage, ©2012 Bloomberg News
Published 08:57 a.m., Friday, July 13, 2012
July 13 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve Bank of New York said it became aware that Barclays Plc was underreporting borrowing costs for the London interbank offered rate as early as 2007.
A Barclays employee explained to a New York Fed staffer in April 2008 that Barclays was underreporting its rate to avoid the stigma associated with being an outlier with respect to its LIBOR submissions, relative to other participating banks, the New York Fed said in a statement posted today on its website.
The Barclays employee also stated that in his opinion other participating banks were also under-reporting their LIBOR submissions.
Caroline Salas Gage, ©2012 Bloomberg News
Published 08:57 a.m., Friday, July 13, 2012
July 13 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve Bank of New York said it became aware that Barclays Plc was underreporting borrowing costs for the London interbank offered rate as early as 2007.
A Barclays employee explained to a New York Fed staffer in April 2008 that Barclays was underreporting its rate to avoid the stigma associated with being an outlier with respect to its LIBOR submissions, relative to other participating banks, the New York Fed said in a statement posted today on its website.
The Barclays employee also stated that in his opinion other participating banks were also under-reporting their LIBOR submissions.
http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomberg/article/New-York-Fed-Says-It-Knew-Barclays-Was-3705086.php
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Geither had just been appointed in 2008, and it sounds like he gave reasonable advice. There is no
pnwmom
Jul 2012
#14
1) NY Fed knew for at least a year before any sort of memo was sent. 2) Nothing was said publicly.
leveymg
Jul 2012
#51
Where have you pulled "he discovers that Barclays is not giving accurate information" from?
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2012
#32
But the OP gives the distinct impression that you think the article indicates he did something wrong
drm604
Jul 2012
#12
The $200 billion bail-out for predator banks and Spitzer charges are intimately linked
midnight
Jul 2012
#27
new WaPo headline: Geithner made recommendations on Libor in 2008, documents show
maddezmom
Jul 2012
#37
Yep, that was a better headline, more information with the same conclusion...
MrMickeysMom
Jul 2012
#41