Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Assange lawyer: Manning commutation doesn't meet extradition offer's conditions [View all]cloudythescribbler
(2,598 posts)22. it is NOT self-evident to me (especially ur throwing Snowden in the list) that they're useful idiots
I think that Palast's report is VERY convincing, judging the reporting on programs like CrossCheck and not an ad hominem about the man.
As for Assange -- his revelations all other things being equal, exposed stuff in the Democratic Party of interest to the cognoscenti, which in my arrogant opinion (imao) had virtually no effect on the election, far less than eg Comey.
Since Assange and others are being scapegoated for HRC's defeat, there are many fewer defenders here on DU. Plenty of progressives still respect him and the Intercept and Greenwald.
That you throw in Snowden w/the list suggests that you really don't like the leaking of dirt altogether, not just when it ostensibly helps the RW (as I haven't seen the case made about Snowden)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Assange lawyer: Manning commutation doesn't meet extradition offer's conditions [View all]
Jose Garcia
Jan 2017
OP
It's dump-on-the-left-fest (Assange, Greenwald, Lee Fang etc) time, but I support Assange
cloudythescribbler
Jan 2017
#9
neither supported Trump even implicitly -- but both opposed Hillary as did many (not me) on the Left
cloudythescribbler
Jan 2017
#23
wrongly, in my view, many of my fellow leftists argued the difference wasn't worth voting for
cloudythescribbler
Jan 2017
#38
Palast is a sensationalist hack & Assange never intended to face his rape charges or any other
uhnope
Jan 2017
#15
it is NOT self-evident to me (especially ur throwing Snowden in the list) that they're useful idiots
cloudythescribbler
Jan 2017
#22
I've read about the trashing job of Snowden but have no plans to read the book itself
cloudythescribbler
Jan 2017
#39
what days are these when we can't trust rapists working for Vladimir Putin? nt
geek tragedy
Jan 2017
#16
While I feel like we need rogue sources like wikileaks, I don't have to think that the people
JCanete
Jan 2017
#17
The US hasnt expressed any interest in extraditing Assange ever but it refuses to issue any
cstanleytech
Jan 2017
#44
LIARS!! The words "released immediately" were nowhere in the Wikileaks statement.
pnwmom
Jan 2017
#21
LOL! If it looks like a weasel, and smells like a weasel, and acts like a weasel.....
Squinch
Jan 2017
#27
Snowshit never intended to follow through anyway - he could come up with something.
Lil Missy
Jan 2017
#31
I doubt Assange is even a mild blip on the list and Snowden isnt much better since
cstanleytech
Jan 2017
#45
Since the US has never requested his extradition the whole declaration was for publicity.
tammywammy
Jan 2017
#50