Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

milestogo

(23,170 posts)
21. Withdrawal from Trans-Pacific Partnership shifts U.S. role in world economy
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 11:25 PM
Jan 2017

By Ylan Q. Mui January 23 at 8:02 PM

President Trump’s cancellation Monday of an agreement for a sweeping trade deal with Asia began recasting America’s role in the global economy, leaving an opening for other countries to flex their muscles.

Trump’s executive order formally ending the United States’ participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership was a largely symbolic move intended to signal that his tough talk on trade during the campaign will carry over to his new administration. The action came as China and other emerging economies are seeking to increase their leverage in global affairs, seizing on America’s turn inward.

Mexico’s President Enrique Peña Nieto declared Monday that his country hopes to bolster trade with other nations and limit its reliance on the United States. Chinese state media derided Western democracy as having “reached its limits”; President Xi Jinping had touted Beijing’s commitment to globalization during his first appearance at the annual gathering of the world’s economic elite last week in Davos, Switzerland.

“This abrupt action so early in the Trump administration puts the world on notice that all of America’s traditional economic and political alliances are now open to reassessment and renegotiation,” said Eswar Prasad, a professor of trade policy at Cornell University. “This could have an adverse long-run impact on the ability of the U.S. to maintain its influence and leadership in world economic and political affairs.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/withdrawal-from-trans-pacific-partnership-shifts-us-role-in-world-economy/2017/01/23/05720df6-e1a6-11e6-a453-19ec4b3d09ba_story.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Japan and China have already started regional trade talks Recursion Jan 2017 #1
Trump doesn't grasp geopolitics. joshcryer Jan 2017 #2
So here's one advantage of the short attention spans in Dumbfuckistan Recursion Jan 2017 #3
After thinking about it for awhile... joshcryer Jan 2017 #18
It's too labor friendly though Recursion Jan 2017 #19
Please give a link explaining how ISDS would "cover US's Ass" nikto Jan 2017 #23
How dare OTHER countries talk trade, without the US calling the shots? nikto Jan 2017 #25
They're free to, but we'd much rather have a hand in the agreement to protect our interests Recursion Jan 2017 #28
That's what Mickey Kantor would say nikto Jan 2017 #34
What is it about unions and minimum wages that bothers you? Recursion Jan 2017 #37
I would ask you the same question nikto Jan 2017 #47
I think I am starting to revise my thoughts on the TPP. nycbos Jan 2017 #4
Don't bother, there is no new evidence nikto Jan 2017 #26
China will now right the rules to trade in the pacific. nycbos Jan 2017 #30
Yeah, if China insists on LOW wages, poor environmental conditions, and NO regulations, that's bad nikto Jan 2017 #32
Err.. environmental and labor groups were part of the negotiation team Recursion Jan 2017 #38
I challenge you to back that up with a solid evidential link nikto Jan 2017 #46
Didn't think so. nikto Jan 2017 #48
Incapable of a factual response? nikto Jan 2017 #49
You offered no evidence for your ridiculous claim Recursion Jan 2017 #50
Thank you for some apparent substance, but ofcourse bias is unavoidable nikto Jan 2017 #51
1st impression is that ... nikto Jan 2017 #52
AFL-CIO's final weigh-In (after full-text was released and analyzed) nikto Jan 2017 #53
... SidDithers Jan 2017 #54
The US never ratified the agreement oberliner Jan 2017 #5
Exactly watoos Jan 2017 #10
What time does his his day start? Maybe he'll take today off, too. tom_kelly Jan 2017 #6
Oh goodie! Now China gets to set the rules for the Asian market, and Americans can look forward to BlueCaliDem Jan 2017 #7
China will take the USAs billions in trade but the other countries still have their TPP trade agreem Sunlei Jan 2017 #13
Yup. We've been screwed by ideologues and isolationists, and China is the dog that walks BlueCaliDem Jan 2017 #40
China was not going to be in TPP, so they could undercut TPP partner nations. TheBlackAdder Jan 2017 #15
Also, one BIG purpose of TPP was to ... nikto Jan 2017 #27
Trade from this market was going to happen regardless of TPP. joshcryer Jan 2017 #17
If TPP was a good plan for the public it would have been made public harun Jan 2017 #35
ALL trade deals are negotiated in secret for a reason! We were only ONE country in 12 BlueCaliDem Jan 2017 #39
Compassionate Conservatives harun Jan 2017 #42
What pushed Trumputin over the top was the ignorance of the American people. Period. BlueCaliDem Jan 2017 #43
Remember the good old days when I continually asked Blue_Tires Jan 2017 #8
The russian hackings & blackmail worked really well. Sunlei Jan 2017 #14
China isn't in a trade agreement with us, and will still export cheap stuff... brooklynite Jan 2017 #9
It's not about trade for me watoos Jan 2017 #11
This is just "reality show" theatrics. There never was a ratified TPP. PSPS Jan 2017 #12
yeah, i was gonna mention that. mopinko Jan 2017 #16
Yep. Rex Jan 2017 #20
Wrong. nikto Jan 2017 #24
Withdrawal from Trans-Pacific Partnership shifts U.S. role in world economy milestogo Jan 2017 #21
Good! nikto Jan 2017 #22
Why don't you want Vietnamese workers to have a minimum wage or independent labor unions? Recursion Jan 2017 #29
Vietnamese workers would have been kept poor, and their nation's environment, ruined nikto Jan 2017 #33
And you want to keep that happening. Recursion Jan 2017 #36
Keep what happening? That is a truncated, blurry answer. nikto Jan 2017 #45
It gets better: Blue_Tires Jan 2017 #31
This is exactly what President Obama warned us about, but ideologues on both sides played their BlueCaliDem Jan 2017 #41
Obama wasn't going to sign it, HRC said she was not for it. Rex Jan 2017 #44
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»TPP withdrawal Trump's fi...»Reply #21