Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 94 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Columbia man accused in s...»Reply #2
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

In reply to the discussion: Columbia man accused in shooting thought new Missouri gun law protected him [View all]
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
2. Typical white wing gun fancier, just looking for justification to shoot someone, even one fleeing.
Reply to pstokely (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2017, 07:05 AM
Jan 2017

Gun nut shot at a guy 6 times for stealing his Iphone. Christ.


?quality=85&strip=all&strip=all

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Columbia man accused in shooting thought new Missouri gun law protected him [View all] pstokely Jan 2017 OP
yay guns! and the idiots wielding them! KG Jan 2017 #1
Typical white wing gun fancier, just looking for justification to shoot someone, even one fleeing. Hoyt Jan 2017 #2
interisting ideas. i also notice that even when those were suggested the gun owners get upset. AllaN01Bear Jan 2017 #8
Couldn't run fast enough to get it back, so he dropped him. Judi Lynn Jan 2017 #20
Can't fix stupid DeminPennswoods Jan 2017 #3
Ignorance is no excuse. NT Ilsa Jan 2017 #4
Here's the kind of law that Missouri should have passed.... Sancho Jan 2017 #5
pretty good ideas. safeinOhio Jan 2017 #7
So, basically you only want the 1% to have guns. AtheistCrusader Jan 2017 #11
Yep...if you are too poor to drive or buy groceries, you don't need a gun! Sancho Jan 2017 #13
So, poor people are dangerous? AtheistCrusader Jan 2017 #14
No...you're the one who said you were too poor to own a gun... Sancho Jan 2017 #16
I'm not, in fact, I meet some of the storage and insurnace requirements you specify. AtheistCrusader Jan 2017 #18
If dangerous people don't have easy access to guns, then the need for self-defense is a small issue. Sancho Jan 2017 #19
Have you not ever seen someone beaten to death? AtheistCrusader Jan 2017 #21
I specifically said...NOT A MENTAL HEALTH DIAGNOSIS...but an assessment of safety to have a gun. Sancho Jan 2017 #22
Pricing poor people out of firearms does not 'prevent dangerous people from easy access to guns'. AtheistCrusader Jan 2017 #23
Yep...I knew it was a legalistic issue... Sancho Jan 2017 #25
You didn't say dangerous earlier. You said depression. These are not the same thing. AtheistCrusader Jan 2017 #26
So if it is not illegal than it is autmatically moral? HopeAgain Jan 2017 #6
More to come! HAB911 Jan 2017 #9
These laws will eventually go away, and it'll start in Florida. cab67 Jan 2017 #10
Huh. Good point. Sounds right. randome Jan 2017 #12
Try taking a gun to Disney World and see what happens. Sen. Walter Sobchak Jan 2017 #17
Disney just turns you around at the metal detectors. ManiacJoe Jan 2017 #24
Before one can claim Stand Your Ground, one first has to claim self defense. ManiacJoe Jan 2017 #15
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Columbia man accused in s...»Reply #2
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2026 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.