Latest Breaking News

FBaggins

(28,706 posts)

32. That's unlikely in this case

Sat Jan 28, 2017, 10:43 PM

Jan 2017

This isn't going to be popular, but I'd say that it's unlikely that the temporary stay lasts for very long.

There just isn't much room legally or constitutionally here. It's bad foreign policy, but it's entirely within the powers of the executive.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

110 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Federal court halts Trumps immigration ban [View all] rug Jan 2017 OP

Kudos to the ACLU once again. NT enough Jan 2017 #1

This is why we must donate to them now more than ever before. llmart Jan 2017 #25

Did that on Inauguration Day, but thinking we may need to enough Jan 2017 #60

Great! llmart Jan 2017 #97

Yeah, I will renew my membership as well. lark Jan 2017 #99

Signed up for a monthly donation the day after the election. 2theleft Jan 2017 #73

I'm going to do that today... llmart Jan 2017 #98

FUCKING Hooray!!!!! George II Jan 2017 #2

The dicktator will probably order Homeland Security to ignore the ruling. tenorly Jan 2017 #3

Oh, I hope he does. Would love to see him place himself above the courts. Stonepounder Jan 2017 #13

I wish I could share your optimism. tenorly Jan 2017 #28

(...followed by "Reichstag fire"........) lastlib Jan 2017 #69

Then we invade Poland ... Fantastic Anarchist Jan 2017 #107

Just read on another thread orangecrush Jan 2017 #75

Link? Stonepounder Jan 2017 #77

Don't remember orangecrush Jan 2017 #80

Here ya go orangecrush Jan 2017 #81

Thanks. I couldn't believe it was true when I first heard. Stonepounder Jan 2017 #109

We must all orangecrush Jan 2017 #110

Finally...someone with some balls to stand up to the Cult Leader in Chief NoGoodNamesLeft Jan 2017 #4

hopefully more will follow starshine00 Jan 2017 #7

And i thinkmthe judge is female...his head will spin round and round nt adigal Jan 2017 #20

FEmale judge . . . OldRedneck Jan 2017 #29

I think she had an Irish name...watch Trump go Irish immigrants now! adigal Jan 2017 #38

Judge Ann Donnelly rug Jan 2017 #46

Just wait until some murielm99 Jan 2017 #67

Just curious - prosecuted by whom? erronis Jan 2017 #108

Thank you ACLU! hrmjustin Jan 2017 #5

My donation for the month just went to the ACLU. I have a feeling they will need it (small as riversedge Jan 2017 #6

Tweet: Trump Administration will regroup and try again, but thank God we still have one sane branch riversedge Jan 2017 #8

When is the last time a Presidential Executive Order was blocked in less that 12 hours? rug Jan 2017 #9

The ban was signed Friday wasn't it? late Friday I think. But your point is good--it was quick riversedge Jan 2017 #11

You are correct. Here's the Complaint the ACLU filed today. rug Jan 2017 #12

'Fifth Amendment procedural and substantive due process rights' bucolic_frolic Jan 2017 #34

I'm trying to get the Order but the court's website is swamped. rug Jan 2017 #39

The decision and order are at this link: rug Jan 2017 #63

K and R and pic from JFK.. riversedge Jan 2017 #10

I bet Cheeto Benito's face is turning Flamin' Hot red Dopers_Greed Jan 2017 #14

Thank God. Stop the madness. nt leftyladyfrommo Jan 2017 #15

The Trump Admin. (inc. Kellyanne) better get used to this. We NCjack Jan 2017 #16

Trump has lived by lawsuits and threats of lawsuits. Wait until he finds out underpants Jan 2017 #21

will be one of many court orders against STDs elmac Jan 2017 #17

Count down to the tweet......and I think it was a woman judge? 3,2,1..... adigal Jan 2017 #18

I said in another thread... llmart Jan 2017 #30

K&R...go for 🤗 Meltdown. dae Jan 2017 #19

To every protestor, every lawyer, the ACLU.....THANK YOU! democrank Jan 2017 #22

Thank goodness! I've been so worried about a family I saw on the news tonight!! Tess49 Jan 2017 #23

Hurray!! Sophiegirl Jan 2017 #24

Constitutional crisis on the way . . . OldRedneck Jan 2017 #26

That's unlikely in this case FBaggins Jan 2017 #32

No it isn't. rug Jan 2017 #37

Not sure how you even think that's relevant. FBaggins Jan 2017 #40

Leaving aside the Port Authority, which operates JFK, how's this? rug Jan 2017 #43

They don't operate ALL of JFK FBaggins Jan 2017 #47

You do realize the TRO could not have been granted unless it was shown there is a likelihood rug Jan 2017 #49

In the mind of one judge, yes FBaggins Jan 2017 #57

Not necessarily onenote Jan 2017 #58

Here's the decision and order: rug Jan 2017 #61

Thanks. Great that they made that finding. onenote Jan 2017 #62

In this case, the judge did rule that there was a likelihood of success. FBaggins Jan 2017 #64

Yep. Very glad to see that. onenote Jan 2017 #65

Theses are legal entrants treestar Jan 2017 #87

You have it backward FBaggins Jan 2017 #89

There are immigration laws, and he is violating them treestar Jan 2017 #90

There are immigration laws? FBaggins Jan 2017 #91

He's not using that law treestar Jan 2017 #92

Actually, he is... but he doesn't need to FBaggins Jan 2017 #94

That should be challenged treestar Jan 2017 #95

That's what the ACLU is trying to do FBaggins Jan 2017 #96

By Whom? Ccarmona Jan 2017 #36

good news AlexSFCA Jan 2017 #27

Remind me to rejoin the ACLU Hekate Jan 2017 #31

Rejoin the ACLU. rug Jan 2017 #33

Can't because the full site is down. High traffic (because everyone is signing up). DRoseDARs Jan 2017 #44

Hah! Hekate Jan 2017 #79

Executive Orders subject to Extreme Judicial Vetting. nt Xipe Totec Jan 2017 #35

game on....fuckers.... dhill926 Jan 2017 #41

What you said. n/t orangecrush Jan 2017 #76

I think the whole world just woke up. GliderGuider Jan 2017 #93

Damn good news! paleotn Jan 2017 #42

So, happy!!! Now to make the temporary stay a permanent ruling. nt iluvtennis Jan 2017 #45

Here's a NYT article with more info uppityperson Jan 2017 #48

Thanks but I'm paywalled. rug Jan 2017 #50

They are not sending people back, but not letting them in to the US but in case by case basis uppityperson Jan 2017 #52

Did the article state when the hearing on the permanent injunction will be held? rug Jan 2017 #54

Sorry, I don't remember and want to save my last views uppityperson Jan 2017 #56

can you use another browser?... you can get around the 10 per month limit Fast Walker 52 Jan 2017 #53

Ah! I'll try! rug Jan 2017 #55

It worked! The text of the Order is at the link. rug Jan 2017 #59

go incognito you can get past irisblue Jan 2017 #66

Copy the link into an incognito/private mode window Occulus Jan 2017 #86

I started monthly donations to the ACLU after tRump was elected Fast Walker 52 Jan 2017 #51

That was my first act after Tump victory was announced. Blue Idaho Jan 2017 #104

I that judge must have been "a Mexican" too?... TrollBuster9090 Jan 2017 #68

By way of Royal Oak, Michigan rug Jan 2017 #70

yabbadabb dooooo AllaN01Bear Jan 2017 #71

K&R! stonecutter357 Jan 2017 #72

Let us see where this goes Flatpicker Jan 2017 #74

It's 2am so it should start any minute now. briv1016 Jan 2017 #82

Once again, tRump proves he's incompetent and overreaching. manicraven Jan 2017 #78

Trump regime to IGNORE court order bigdarryl Jan 2017 #83

Not exactly FBaggins Jan 2017 #88

k and r... Stuart G Jan 2017 #84

Number 1 story around the World...k and r...nt Stuart G Jan 2017 #85

None of the judges have ordered a halt to the detentions or the release of anyone progree Jan 2017 #100

If Trump fails to follow this court order then INdemo Jan 2017 #101

What court order is Trump / DHS not following? progree Jan 2017 #102

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028559232 INdemo Jan 2017 #103

I don't think the admin/DHS violated the first 3 court rulings. But there is a 4th one ... progree Jan 2017 #105

KUDOS TO ACLU!!!!! ailsagirl Jan 2017 #106