Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

bold move Angry Dragon Feb 2017 #1
Bold but stupid. No guarantee that Garland would be confirmed. yellowcanine Feb 2017 #9
They get confirmed together...or not at all...one vote. Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #10
That isn't going to happen. onenote Feb 2017 #36
probably not. Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #55
Why don't we add that Trump Yupster Feb 2017 #40
Yes but make it cost him...nuke the filibuster. Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #54
I assume the resignation would be contingent on, and only take effect onenote Feb 2017 #37
Agreed. I don't trust McTurtle either. lastlib Feb 2017 #48
I too call things 'stupid' without full and relevant knowledge. We're Americans... it's what we do. LanternWaste Feb 2017 #57
WHAT.IN.THE.FUCK! 50 Shades Of Blue Feb 2017 #2
Sounds like a episode of Sherman A1 Feb 2017 #3
Exactly! elleng Feb 2017 #24
My thought also, of course, reality less promising Hortensis Feb 2017 #30
Would NOT trust Trump as far as I could throw a f'ing piano on that one. n/t CincyDem Feb 2017 #4
Exactly what I was thinking! pandr32 Feb 2017 #6
Or McConnell! JudyM Feb 2017 #12
"if Trump promises" -- DO NOT BELIEVE tRUMP! tRump is not a man of his word. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2017 #5
That was my thought when I read the article.... and probably most everyone else as well groundloop Feb 2017 #39
Would be worth investigating IF there was any republican to be trusted... Old Vet Feb 2017 #7
Sounds like the North Carolina deal exboyfil Feb 2017 #8
She's already said Shell_Seas Feb 2017 #17
I would take that trade in a heart beat exboyfil Feb 2017 #20
Me too. Native Feb 2017 #49
I pray for her health every day.... paleotn Feb 2017 #44
Trump can't resist a deal bucolic_frolic Feb 2017 #11
Doesn't work if the retiring judge is a liberal. The court then has a conservative stopbush Feb 2017 #13
True. But when Gorsuch is confirmed (and he will be) it will be 5-4 conservative onenote Feb 2017 #38
"Trump promises" briv1016 Feb 2017 #14
I don't think thwy will go for it. AgadorSparticus Feb 2017 #15
They won't. Shell_Seas Feb 2017 #18
They MIGHT go for it if a Liberal leaning judge would retire ToxMarz Feb 2017 #23
Aaron Sorkin thought of it first. alarimer Feb 2017 #16
Nice idea BainsBane Feb 2017 #19
Garland was already the compromise. wildeyed Feb 2017 #21
agreed NewJeffCT Feb 2017 #27
Yup. truebluegreen Feb 2017 #31
Garland and Ayotte bucolic_frolic Feb 2017 #22
Well GOLLY! It worked in "THE WEST WING"... brooklynite Feb 2017 #25
yeah. mopinko Feb 2017 #50
ONLY if Clarence "Coke-can" Thomas hands his resignation in BEFORE any votes. nt pkdu Feb 2017 #26
That will never happen red dog 1 Feb 2017 #42
He's been watching The West Wing. truebluegreen Feb 2017 #28
What's Udall been Rebl2 Feb 2017 #29
Dream on. Rethuglicans will never agree to this. Trust Buster Feb 2017 #32
If this odd situation occured then Republicans would find a way INdemo Feb 2017 #33
oh...Trust Trump ??? Rustyeye77 Feb 2017 #34
I got a better idea... Rustyeye77 Feb 2017 #35
Bad idea. lark Feb 2017 #41
Which would be fine if we had a trustworthy president IronLionZion Feb 2017 #43
I prefer this variant: Retrograde Feb 2017 #45
"Would be voted on" - those are weasel words! They'll vote "yes" and "no"! Crash2Parties Feb 2017 #46
"Promise"????????? Cryptoad Feb 2017 #47
Trump likes deals HoneyBadger Feb 2017 #51
Only if Thomas is the one to go Buckeyeblue Feb 2017 #52
Republicans don't keep deals yurbud Feb 2017 #53
No way Fatemah2774 Feb 2017 #56
No no no no no to Gorsuch! Sparky 1 Feb 2017 #58
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Udall floats plan to conf...»Reply #48