Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MN_Caucus

(5 posts)
8. The fact that the company's name is UBER should have been a hint
Mon Mar 20, 2017, 10:51 AM
Mar 2017

On the one hand, it's not a bad idea to let people use their one real resource, their car, as a way to make money on the side when they can / want.

On the other hand... omfg yes it's unfair competition. a level playing field means EVERYONE has to play by the rules!

An uber like setup run by region, or even a gov-run operation for people on the lower end of the spectrum is still a great idea. Have them run gov-owned and maintained vehicles because taxis are BLOODY EXPENSIVE!

If you could replace some of the blood thirstier taxi companies with fair-leveled gov-run cabs I think it'd be an improvement for everyone. The cabbies get a better, more stable wage, the vehicles get greener, and people get a safer, more affordable ride.

I think uber took off because of a rebellion against the cab companies more than the drivers themselves... mostly.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Uber president Jeff Jones...»Reply #8