Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Comrade_McKenzie

(2,526 posts)
2. Yep, I don't believe that lawyer for a second...
Mon Jul 23, 2012, 05:47 PM
Jul 2012

When he says that the public outrage had nothing to do with the decision.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What would have happened to her, 20 years ago? AtheistCrusader Jul 2012 #1
Yep, I don't believe that lawyer for a second... Comrade_McKenzie Jul 2012 #2
I can understand the request for a gag order ChairmanAgnostic Jul 2012 #3
Regardless, there never should have been a gag order that pertained to the victim. 1monster Jul 2012 #7
I'm with you on this ChairmanAgnostic Jul 2012 #10
Good to hear. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Gman Jul 2012 #5
This is good news Gothmog Jul 2012 #6
Good 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #8
No sense at all. Part of the reason for publishing the names of the guilty A Simple Game Jul 2012 #9
excellent! Liberal_in_LA Jul 2012 #11
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Contempt motion dropped a...»Reply #2