Latest Breaking News

duncang

(3,767 posts)

98. This!!

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 06:59 PM

Apr 2017

She was a National security Advisor. I would think that russian interference in to the U.S. elections should be looked at by the NSC. And yep, if a U.S. citizen was aiding or abetting that interference it should be known.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

120 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Top Obama Adviser Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel [View all] 7962 Apr 2017 OP

The info apparently is coming from the trump team. I'll believe it if and when Rice shraby Apr 2017 #1

I just typed "Susan Rice" into twitter search. Whow--the RW is having riversedge Apr 2017 #2

That was the idea. The RW has had a seething hatred of Rice ever since 'Benghaaaaazi!!1!!!' TrollBuster9090 Apr 2017 #52

Yes, so true. Susan Rice has been on the RW radar for a LONGGGGGGGGG time. riversedge Apr 2017 #96

Agreed they have shown zero regard to telling the truth in the past from the cstanleytech Apr 2017 #23

All they're doing is PROVING leftynyc Apr 2017 #31

yep it's a lie azureblue Apr 2017 #59

I saw who posted it here and figured it might be a lie Eliot Rosewater Apr 2017 #101

Were these Trump associates communicating with the targets in question? ck4829 Apr 2017 #3

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2017 #4

They posted 4 paragraphs from the article Cal Carpenter Apr 2017 #7

Thank you, Cal. 7962 Apr 2017 #11

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2017 #21

So a summary of what Rice said is "Trump and his people are lying through their teeth....again." cstanleytech Apr 2017 #24

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2017 #32

Thank you Alterego for giving it proper context and content still_one Apr 2017 #29

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2017 #37

Why are you (someone who joined today) accusing a long time DUer of being a troll? Dr Hobbitstein Apr 2017 #30

Or a Russian troll SayItLoud Apr 2017 #33

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2017 #38

I thought it was a very good question... SkyDaddy7 Apr 2017 #57

Exactly, Alterego1955. There's no excuse for the misleading OP. nt SunSeeker Apr 2017 #34

Please don't accuse other posters of fake news Maeve Apr 2017 #8

Thank you, Maeve. 7962 Apr 2017 #12

Why didn't you include Rice's denial? SunSeeker Apr 2017 #36

Anyone can follow the link. I don't see the problem anyway. If Susan Rice saw a reason pnwmom Apr 2017 #65

Few people follow the link. Why ONLY give the White House side in the OP? SunSeeker Apr 2017 #73

I don't think those 4 paragraphs say anything negative. She was the NS advisor and had every right pnwmom Apr 2017 #76

The headline was very misleading and negative. nt SunSeeker Apr 2017 #79

Why? When I saw it, my conclusion was that she had a good reason to seek the names of those involved pnwmom Apr 2017 #80

The article does not provide that good reason, nor explain it was her job to review the intelligence SunSeeker Apr 2017 #83

His top advisor sought names. Nothing in there is negative in itself. Advisors have the right pnwmom Apr 2017 #103

Of course. But the article and headline did not say that. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #105

Narratives and agendas are getting sloppy. LanternWaste Apr 2017 #69

If you want uniform "narratives and agendas," you'll have to go to a right wing site. nt SunSeeker Apr 2017 #84

That doesn't mean he has to take the first four which are misleading as to the shraby Apr 2017 #14

They don't look misleading to me. muriel_volestrangler Apr 2017 #19

Not including Rice's denial is VERY MISLEADING. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #35

Personally, I don't think it's misleading. I ASSUMED she'd deny it. Not having seen any news yet TrollBuster9090 Apr 2017 #54

Not including Rice's denial makes it look like the headline is fact rather than Trump assertion. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #61

Just watched Faux News' 'The Five,' and sadly you're right. TrollBuster9090 Apr 2017 #92

Which is what I figured she would do as well. nt 7962 Apr 2017 #64

"Rice did not respond to an email seeking comment on Monday morning" muriel_volestrangler Apr 2017 #77

The headline was very misleading; the OP should have included the denial in the article. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #81

"last month" is not "late breaking news". muriel_volestrangler Apr 2017 #85

Without the denial, the headline is misleading. The denial was in the article. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #86

Fuck it, I don't want DU to become some closed-off world of denial muriel_volestrangler Apr 2017 #87

This message was self-deleted by its author Vinnie From Indy Apr 2017 #89

+1 Vinnie From Indy Apr 2017 #90

OFFS, I AM LOOKING AT WHAT IS BEING REPORTED. That is my point. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #91

No, the OP did not delete anything muriel_volestrangler Apr 2017 #94

The OP chose to not include a key fact FOUND IN THE ARTICLE. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #97

Oh, look, that's an article based on the one in the OP muriel_volestrangler Apr 2017 #99

The rule is 4 paragraphs, not "the 1st 4 paragraphs." SunSeeker Apr 2017 #102

CBS: "A Monday report by Bloombergs Eli Lake said that Rice requested the unmasking" muriel_volestrangler Apr 2017 #106

Objections to misleading OPs is not "ridiculous whining." SunSeeker Apr 2017 #108

Thank you for trying but sadly i think you're wasting your "breath' 7962 Apr 2017 #112

Well, hell, maybe folks will actually READ the article! 7962 Apr 2017 #63

How about exercising some JUDGMENT in picking your 4 paragraphs? SunSeeker Apr 2017 #95

See, this is the thing - you are demanding we put our own spin on the news muriel_volestrangler Apr 2017 #100

I am not asking for "spin," just that the OP not be misleading. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #104

By not including relevant paragraphs which can contradict the headline, you ARE putting a shraby Apr 2017 #119

And there is, for legal reasons, a 4 paragraph limit, so you can't include all of them muriel_volestrangler Apr 2017 #120

The CBS article is 7 hrs after what I posted. Should I be clairvoyant as well? 7962 Apr 2017 #107

Welcome to DU! Vinnie From Indy Apr 2017 #20

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2017 #27

You like this place? Vinnie From Indy Apr 2017 #39

is this your alter ego? snooper2 Apr 2017 #41

"You cannot deny that the post in context looked like a troll's post." oberliner Apr 2017 #50

Welcome to DU, Alterego1955! calimary Apr 2017 #26

You have pointed out the shortcomings of the BLOOMBERG article, please don't accuse DUers yodermon Apr 2017 #49

I think a 5 post member has some learning of rules before accusing a 9,000 post member Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2017 #51

How come there are no photos or information about this Ezra Cohen-Watnick? shraby Apr 2017 #5

He's been all over the news lately, here's lots of links BamaRefugee Apr 2017 #9

Most of those articles really don't have much about Ezra..and not pictures shraby Apr 2017 #16

Well, if they link to Leonard Cohen, it can't be a waste of time! TrollBuster9090 Apr 2017 #56

Try this: muriel_volestrangler Apr 2017 #15

Thanks. shraby Apr 2017 #18

Flynns flunkie elehhhhna Apr 2017 #22

Still no photos ... alwaysinflux Apr 2017 #40

Do photos matter? Do you need to be able to recognise him? muriel_volestrangler Apr 2017 #78

It's her job to decide if she needs to know or not. randome Apr 2017 #6

This!! duncang Apr 2017 #98

Seems prudent to me. harun Apr 2017 #111

Here we go with yet another "distraction" awesomerwb Apr 2017 #10

What else they got? Percy Cholmondeley Apr 2017 #25

After reading the whole article, I find the headline particularly misleading. shraby Apr 2017 #13

The author has worked for Washington Times UPI underpants Apr 2017 #53

It sounds like FISA warrants were obtained on US persons. underthematrix Apr 2017 #17

Uh - no leftynyc Apr 2017 #42

Wait a minute. I did not misspeak underthematrix Apr 2017 #113

Yes you did mispeak leftynyc Apr 2017 #114

I did not misspeak about US persons being the subjects of FISA warrants underthematrix Apr 2017 #115

So Ezra Cohen-Watnik,( Flynn's protege who McMaster tried to fire) is behind leak of this diversion wishstar Apr 2017 #28

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2017 #44

tiny bit of smoke but zero fire - Ms. Rice did nothing wrong - only her job..... NoMoreRepugs Apr 2017 #43

Your OP is very misleading. One of your 4 paragraphs should have been Rices's DENIAL. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #45

If part of Ms. Rice's routine briefings from IC analysts hinted at emerging patterns, bigbrother05 Apr 2017 #46

Oh-oh. zentrum Apr 2017 #47

So, somebody LEAKED the false narrative that Rice was behind the LEAKS that damaged Trump. TrollBuster9090 Apr 2017 #48

Oh yeah this is big shakes in RW world. Following up on Evelyn Farkas underpants Apr 2017 #55

Seems there may have been some in this thread. So many "self deletes" here. C Moon Apr 2017 #58

Let me get this straight. ProudLib72 Apr 2017 #60

THIS SteamAddict Apr 2017 #118

It's perfectly legal for Rice to do this OKNancy Apr 2017 #62

I haven't read through all the stuff about this, but she did so in the course of her job, and she... George II Apr 2017 #66

CNN is explaining exactly what I said above - they were listening to Russians and found out... George II Apr 2017 #68

The head of the nsc for fucks sake elehhhhna Apr 2017 #109

Fake News Fake News. Wellstone ruled Apr 2017 #67

Obama Executive order 12333 Gymbo Apr 2017 #70

" " " " n/t MBS Apr 2017 #88

Um, yeah, she was the National Security Adviser--part of her job to geek tragedy Apr 2017 #71

This bull$hit headline should be removed! rainlillie Apr 2017 #72

I agree. Very misleading headline. nt SunSeeker Apr 2017 #75

We're not allowed to change headlines according to posting rules 7962 Apr 2017 #82

You chose this headline to post as an OP. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #93

It was the FIRST story. Your link refers to THIS story. Please, get over it!! 7962 Apr 2017 #117

I am not sure what the there there is about... pbmus Apr 2017 #74

As of 8:00 PM CNN is reporting that this is false. George II Apr 2017 #110

Eli Lake NewRedDawn Apr 2017 #116