Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Top Obama Adviser Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel [View all]leftynyc
(26,060 posts)114. Yes you did mispeak
Since that has been denied over and over again. Anything that caught degenerate donnies folks was incidental and wouldn't have come to light if they weren't up to their eyeballs with Russian connections. This whole unmasking story is nothing but a distraction that should only work with imbeciles who don't know better and think unmasking is illegal.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The info apparently is coming from the trump team. I'll believe it if and when Rice
shraby
Apr 2017
#1
That was the idea. The RW has had a seething hatred of Rice ever since 'Benghaaaaazi!!1!!!'
TrollBuster9090
Apr 2017
#52
Agreed they have shown zero regard to telling the truth in the past from the
cstanleytech
Apr 2017
#23
So a summary of what Rice said is "Trump and his people are lying through their teeth....again."
cstanleytech
Apr 2017
#24
Why are you (someone who joined today) accusing a long time DUer of being a troll?
Dr Hobbitstein
Apr 2017
#30
Anyone can follow the link. I don't see the problem anyway. If Susan Rice saw a reason
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#65
I don't think those 4 paragraphs say anything negative. She was the NS advisor and had every right
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#76
Why? When I saw it, my conclusion was that she had a good reason to seek the names of those involved
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#80
The article does not provide that good reason, nor explain it was her job to review the intelligence
SunSeeker
Apr 2017
#83
His top advisor sought names. Nothing in there is negative in itself. Advisors have the right
pnwmom
Apr 2017
#103
If you want uniform "narratives and agendas," you'll have to go to a right wing site. nt
SunSeeker
Apr 2017
#84
Personally, I don't think it's misleading. I ASSUMED she'd deny it. Not having seen any news yet
TrollBuster9090
Apr 2017
#54
Not including Rice's denial makes it look like the headline is fact rather than Trump assertion.
SunSeeker
Apr 2017
#61
"Rice did not respond to an email seeking comment on Monday morning"
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2017
#77
The headline was very misleading; the OP should have included the denial in the article.
SunSeeker
Apr 2017
#81
Without the denial, the headline is misleading. The denial was in the article.
SunSeeker
Apr 2017
#86
Fuck it, I don't want DU to become some closed-off world of denial
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2017
#87
CBS: "A Monday report by Bloombergs Eli Lake said that Rice requested the unmasking"
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2017
#106
See, this is the thing - you are demanding we put our own spin on the news
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2017
#100
By not including relevant paragraphs which can contradict the headline, you ARE putting a
shraby
Apr 2017
#119
And there is, for legal reasons, a 4 paragraph limit, so you can't include all of them
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2017
#120
You have pointed out the shortcomings of the BLOOMBERG article, please don't accuse DUers
yodermon
Apr 2017
#49
I think a 5 post member has some learning of rules before accusing a 9,000 post member
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2017
#51
I did not misspeak about US persons being the subjects of FISA warrants
underthematrix
Apr 2017
#115
So Ezra Cohen-Watnik,( Flynn's protege who McMaster tried to fire) is behind leak of this diversion
wishstar
Apr 2017
#28
tiny bit of smoke but zero fire - Ms. Rice did nothing wrong - only her job.....
NoMoreRepugs
Apr 2017
#43
Your OP is very misleading. One of your 4 paragraphs should have been Rices's DENIAL.
SunSeeker
Apr 2017
#45
If part of Ms. Rice's routine briefings from IC analysts hinted at emerging patterns,
bigbrother05
Apr 2017
#46
So, somebody LEAKED the false narrative that Rice was behind the LEAKS that damaged Trump.
TrollBuster9090
Apr 2017
#48
I haven't read through all the stuff about this, but she did so in the course of her job, and she...
George II
Apr 2017
#66