Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump Suggests Susan Rice Committed Crime, Citing No Evidence [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(70,247 posts)15. Blast from the past: Nixon pronounces Charles Manson "guilty."
Nixon Calls Manson Guilty; Attorneys Move a Mistrial
By Leopold N. Loeb,* August 4, 1970
President Nixon may have freed Charles Manson-not by an act of executive clemency, but by one of errant stupidity. ... Defense attorneys for Manson, Leslie Van Houten, and Susan Atkins-who face charges of murder stemming from the mass killings last August of actress Sharon Tate and six other persons-moved for a mistrial yesterday after learning that Nixon had said that Manson was "guilty, directly or indirectly, of eight murders without reason."
Trial Judge Charles N. Holder denied the motion pending an official version of the Nixon remarks, but a defense attorney said the judge was "alarmed" at the report.
Oops
Late last night, however, Nixon said flatly he did not mean to imply that Manson was guilty.
....
In Los Angeles, defense attorney Paul Fitzgerald told reporters, "If we're going to have the chief executive of this nation categorically or uncategorically speculate on people's guilt, we ought to abandon this court system. Maybe President Nixon in a news conference ought to determine whether these people are guilty."
By Leopold N. Loeb,* August 4, 1970
President Nixon may have freed Charles Manson-not by an act of executive clemency, but by one of errant stupidity. ... Defense attorneys for Manson, Leslie Van Houten, and Susan Atkins-who face charges of murder stemming from the mass killings last August of actress Sharon Tate and six other persons-moved for a mistrial yesterday after learning that Nixon had said that Manson was "guilty, directly or indirectly, of eight murders without reason."
Trial Judge Charles N. Holder denied the motion pending an official version of the Nixon remarks, but a defense attorney said the judge was "alarmed" at the report.
Oops
Late last night, however, Nixon said flatly he did not mean to imply that Manson was guilty.
....
In Los Angeles, defense attorney Paul Fitzgerald told reporters, "If we're going to have the chief executive of this nation categorically or uncategorically speculate on people's guilt, we ought to abandon this court system. Maybe President Nixon in a news conference ought to determine whether these people are guilty."
* "Leopold N. Loeb"? Are you kidding me?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Isnt that like the pot figuratively speaking calling the kettle black. Is he innocent?!
caroldansen
Apr 2017
#1
He just wants "crime" and "someone besides Trump" repeated on the airwaves.
forgotmylogin
Apr 2017
#75
Our 'overseas' allies also intercepted communications and noticed meetings. Even Putin sent a
Sunlei
Apr 2017
#45
He'll make noise against anybody if it takes even a little attention away from #TrumpRussia.
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2017
#13
Smokescreen attempting to divert attention from #TrumpRussia by the Minority President. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2017
#10
Coming from not one of the biggest liars on the continent, but THE biggest liar on the
shraby
Apr 2017
#11
That is by far the most accurate cartoon of this criminally insane-man baby-poor
Guy Whitey Corngood
Apr 2017
#27
more bullshit to feed to his moron followers so they can concoct a new conspiracy
Javaman
Apr 2017
#17
donny, shove it up your bloated butt. We know YOU committed a crime, no "may" about it.
George II
Apr 2017
#20
So they've decided to make Susan Rice the scapegoat to cover up his lie about O wiretapping him.
brush
Apr 2017
#23
Gaslighting. Projection. Bullshit . Lies. Just a normal day in trumpland
NRaleighLiberal
Apr 2017
#26
I hope no one in media assumes: 1) that Trump actually understands the law 2) that Trump
wiggs
Apr 2017
#29
Thanks Mr. Trump! So "Trump associates" really were contacting suspicious Russians.
Sunlei
Apr 2017
#40
He never provided evidence of his Obama wiretapping claim and he will never provide..
CousinIT
Apr 2017
#43
The first sentence is "Fake News"; i.e., Trump did not say "may have." He said, "YES."
WinkyDink
Apr 2017
#44
Benghazi rehash may be coming up - or possibly Rump may produce a unicorn for everyone to look at
NoMoreRepugs
Apr 2017
#49
R/T: None of our modern Presidents have stooped so low. Makes wild charges with no evidence.
riversedge
Apr 2017
#56
ok, we see Another crazy tweet-lie from the Republican but this response is hilarious!
Sunlei
Apr 2017
#57
If she hasnt done anything illegal and if he is lying she needs to sue him as the president does not
cstanleytech
Apr 2017
#58
Hey sexual predator, while you were gallivanting down to Mar A Lago spending $203,000 a hour
turbinetree
Apr 2017
#61
Need to fumigate or tear down the oval office if an adult ever gets in there again.
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2017
#78