Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,614 posts)
2. Exactly.
Fri Apr 14, 2017, 11:33 PM
Apr 2017

Like everybody else, he's either all bad or all good. This can't be a mistake, it's just the evidence needed that he's 100% evil.

Now, had he ever done anything good in his life we'd have a real conundrum, but LA-LA-LA-LA. See, I don't know that this judge ever did a single good act, so I know he's 100% evil.

Not that I'm judgmental or worship at the altar of the fundamental attribution fallacy.

Moral judgments are best reserved for the simplistic, I guess. Everybody else gets caught up in contradictions and complexity.

I'm glad I did something good once. It means I'm 100% good, whatever bad things I might do.

Oh. Wait.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Utah judge at rape senten...»Reply #2